KUR-113 Bone Graft Versus Local Autograft for the Treatment of Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (STRUCTURE)

August 7, 2023 updated by: Kuros Biosurgery AG

A Prospective, Randomized and Non-randomized, Controlled, Single-blind and Open-label, Dose-finding, Multi-center, Parallel Group Study of Safety/Efficacy of KUR-113 Bone Graft Versus Local Autograft for the Treatment of Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of KUR-113 Bone Graft (TGplPTH1-34 in fibrin) compared to local autograft for the treatment of Degenerative Disk Disease (DDD).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common disorder of the lumbar spine. Clinically, DDD causes discogenic back pain and may cause related radicular, neuropathic, claudicatory, and referred pain.

This is a prospective, randomized and non-randomized, controlled, single-blind and open-label, dose-finding, multi-center study which intends to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of KUR-113 Bone Graft (TGplPTH1-34 in fibrin) versus local autograft. The study will enroll 50 patients with Degenerative Disk Disease (DDD) requiring single-level interbody fusion along with posterolateral fusion (PLF) with posterior fixation who meet eligibility criteria and agree to participate in the study. Safety and efficacy of KUR-113 Bone Graft will be evaluated by analyzing all clinical as well as radiological endpoints and adverse events. This phase 2a study is not powered to detect non-inferiority. All patients will undergo clinical and radiological assessments at initial hospital discharge (on average 3 days post-surgery), 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093-0863
        • University of California San Diego
    • Colorado
      • Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80303
        • Justin Parker Neurological Institute
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University-Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
        • Indiana Spine Group
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67226
        • Kansas Spine and Specialty Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49525
        • Orthopedic Associates of Michigan
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University in St. Louis
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
      • Williamsville, New York, United States, 14221
        • University at Buffalo Neurosurgery
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Allegheny General Hospital
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78240
        • South Texas Spine Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written informed consent by the patient.
  2. Male or female patient ≥ 25 up to and including 75 years old. Females of childbearing potential with a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening. Females of childbearing potential must agree to use acceptable contraception for at least 12 months after surgery and investigational product placement.
  3. Patients with degenerative disc disease with up to grade 1 spondylolisthesis and with leg pain requiring up to 3 levels of laminectomy/decompression and a single-level fusion (L2 - S1). DDD is defined by the presence of one or more of the following:

    1. instability (angulation ≥ 5 degrees or translation ≥ 3 mm on flexion/extension radiographs),
    2. osteophyte formation of facet joints or vertebral endplates,
    3. decreased disc height by > 2 mm, but dependent upon the spinal level,
    4. scarring/thickening of ligamentum flavum, annulus fibrosis or facet joint capsule,
    5. disc degeneration and/or herniation,
    6. facet degeneration,
    7. vacuum phenomenon.
  4. Patients with an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score ≥ 35.
  5. Patients with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) leg score ≥ 40.
  6. Failed conservative treatment (physical therapy, bed rest, medications, spinal injections or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) for a period of 6 months prior to study enrollment.
  7. Patients willing to undergo PK sampling.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with open epiphyseal plates.
  2. Patient requiring emergency spinal decompression or spinal fusion.
  3. Patients requiring multilevel fusion or expected to need secondary intervention within one year following surgery.
  4. Any prior fusion or attempted fusion at an adjacent level.
  5. Any prior fusion or attempted fusion at the index level.
  6. Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
  7. Known or suspected allergies to any of the components of KUR-113 Bone Graft (e.g.

    hypersensitivity to aprotinin).

  8. Any prior use of teriparatide or abaloparatide or graft material containing PTH1-34.
  9. Patients with hypercalcemic disorders (e.g., primary hyperparathyroidism).
  10. Patients with Paget's Disease or unexplained high levels of alkaline phosphatase.
  11. Prior radiation therapy involving bone.
  12. Medical history or radiographic evidence of a metabolic bone disorder (e.g. Paget's Disease) or other condition that would negatively impact the healing process.
  13. Any medical condition requiring radiotherapy or immunosuppression.
  14. History of thyroid autoimmune disease (Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Graves' disease) or hyperthyroidism.
  15. Patients on chronic systemic steroids (i.e. > 14 consecutive days) within 6 months prior to Screening Visit.
  16. Osteopenia (T score < -1.0) or osteoporosis of the spine (T score < -2.5).
  17. DDD related to benign or malignant tumor.
  18. History or presence of active malignancy.
  19. Hereditary disorders predisposing to osteosarcoma.
  20. Patients with invasive skin cancer.
  21. Evidence of local or systemic infection.
  22. Patients with known active COVID-19 disease.
  23. Current smokers.
  24. Type 1 diabetes (regardless of HbA1c) or Type 2 diabetes with a documented HbA1c > 7.0.
  25. Any acute or chronic concurrent medical conditions that in the Investigator's opinion are a contraindication to the procedure and study participation.
  26. Participation in another investigational study within 30 days prior to surgery for investigational devices, or within the last three months for investigational drugs. (Note: trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials).
  27. Known substance abuse, psychiatric disorder or a condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, may influence the healing or ability to comply with protocol requirements.
  28. Involved in active litigation relating to his/her spinal condition or workers compensation claimants.
  29. BMI greater than 40.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: KUR-113, Stage 1
During stage 1, subjects randomized to this arm will receive TGplPTH1-34 in fibrin (0.4mg/ml) that will be applied within and around a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) intervertebral cage. The maximum dose that will be applied is 4 mg of TGplPTH1-34 in 10mL KUR-113 Bone Graft.
TGplPTH1-34 within a fibrin matrix applied within and around a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) intervertebral cage
Other Names:
  • KUR-113
Active Comparator: Autologous Bone Graft
During stage 1 of the study, subjects randomized to this arm will receive local autologous bone graft. In the event of insufficient local autograft, Iliac crest bone graft may be used to supplement.
Local autograft collected from decompression which may be supplemented with iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) if local autograft is insufficient.
Experimental: KUR-113, Stage 2
During stage 2, subjects will receive TGplPTH1-34 in fibrin that will be applied within and around a PEEK intervertebral cage at a concentration of 0.7mg/ml. The concentration received was selected by the DSMB based on the results of stage 1. The maximum dose that will be applied is 7 mg of TGplPTH1-34 in 10mL KUR-113 Bone Graft.
TGplPTH1-34 within a fibrin matrix applied within and around a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) intervertebral cage
Other Names:
  • KUR-113

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic interbody fusion
Time Frame: Month 12 post-surgery
Evidence of bridging trabeculae or continuous bony connection between superior and inferior vertebral body on CT-scan as determined by an independent radiology expert panel (IREP).
Month 12 post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Endpoint
Time Frame: Month 6 and Month 12 post-surgery
Radiographic interbody fusion using CT-scans, functional outcome (decrease of 15 points or more on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)) and no post-surgical intervention to aid fusion or replace any of the spinal implants.
Month 6 and Month 12 post-surgery
Radiographic interbody fusion
Time Frame: Month 6 post-surgery
Determined by IREP using CT-scans
Month 6 post-surgery
Radiographic posterolateral fusion
Time Frame: Month 6 and Month 12 post-surgery
Determined by IREP using CT-scans
Month 6 and Month 12 post-surgery
ODI
Time Frame: Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24 post-surgery
Change from baseline
Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24 post-surgery
Leg Pain
Time Frame: Initial discharge from hospital (on average 3 days post-surgery), Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24 post-surgery
Change from baseline using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS is scored from 0 to 100 with higher numbers being a worse outcome than a lower number.
Initial discharge from hospital (on average 3 days post-surgery), Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24 post-surgery
Back Pain
Time Frame: Initial discharge from hospital (on average 3 days post-surgery), Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24 post-surgery
Change from baseline using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS is scored from 0 to 100 with higher numbers being a worse outcome than a lower number.
Initial discharge from hospital (on average 3 days post-surgery), Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24 post-surgery
Number of Secondary Interventions
Time Frame: Up to Month 24 post-surgery
Revisions, re-operations, removals, supplemental fixations, or any other procedure that adjusts or in any way removes part of the original implant configuration with or without replacement of the components
Up to Month 24 post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Chi, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on TGplPTH1-34 in fibrin

3
Subscribe