Establishment of a Personalized Pharmaceutical Plan in Renal or Hepatic Transplant Patients (GREPH)

November 2, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Tours

Mise en Place d'un Plan Pharmaceutique Personnalisé Chez Les Patients transplantés rénaux ou hépatiques : Essai randomisé en Cluster de Type Stepped-wedge.

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of the Personalized Pharmaceutical Plan on the therapeutic adherence to immunosuppressive treatments one year after liver or kidney transplantation.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In 2016, 3,615 renal transplantations (RT) were performed in France. RT is indicated for end-stage renal failure, especially in dialysis patients. The average cost of a year of dialysis is 60,000 €, and that of a kidney transplantation according to the GHS tariff of 20,000 € (excluding preparation of the patient for the transplantation, drugs and post-transplantation follow-up).

In 2016, 1,322 liver transplantations (LT) were performed in France. Indications for LT are mainly acute or chronic hepatic insufficiency and liver tumors. LT is the only therapeutic solution for these patients because there is no such alternative as dialysis in nephrology. According to the DRG (Diagnosis Related Group) tariff, the average cost of a LT is about 35,000€ (excluding preparation for transplantation, drugs and post-transplantation follow-up).

If kidney and liver transplantations allow the patient to return to a life close to normal, with graft survival at one year of 84% for the liver and 91% for the kidney, these is constrained by taking immunosuppressive treatments (IS). In the last few years, progress has been made both in surgery and in immediate post-transplantation management. Therefore, now, the challenges of transplantation lie in the long-term transplant patients management, that is to say in prevention of transplant organ rejection and of anti-rejection drugs side effects (cardiovascular diseases, cancers, infections). This prevention requires optimal adherence of the patients both to the drug treatment and to the hygieno-dietetic rules. The scarcity of grafts in France makes it necessary to maximize graft survival so as to limit the need for a new transplantation.

In the literature, drug adherence of IS is between 45% and 85%. Among the non-adherence factors identified, there is a lack of a therapeutic education program and the delay with respect to the transplantation (with the spacing of the consultations at the hospital).

The investigators hypothesize that the combination of pharmaceutical follow-up during hospitalization, coupled with a strengthened hospital-community link, is central to patient adherence, and therefore to patient and graft survival.

The French Society of Clinical Pharmacy (SFPC) established in 2017 a new model of clinical pharmacy. The latter is based (apart from the regulatory activity of prescriptions analysis), on the implementation of a Personalized Pharmaceutical Plan (PPP) corresponding to a management adapted to the patient's path by proposing best possible medication history, pharmaceutical interviews, dedicated pharmaceutical outpatient consultations and therapeutic education. These actions must be carried out both at the hospital and at the local pharmacy.

Most often, the post-transplantation follow-up is done by the transplant center or for some cases (especially for the liver) by expert centers closer to the patient's home but often quite far from the transplant team. Primary care teams have little or no integration into the care of these patients. This is why the community pharmacist, in collaboration with the transplant team, could be a relay close to the patient ensuring continuity, repetition of messages and follow-up as soon as the post-transplantation consultations spread out.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1716

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brest, France, 29609
        • CHU-BREST - Pharmacie clinique La Cavale Blanche
      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • APHM - Service de Pharmacie Clinique; Hôpital de la Timone
      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • APHM Service Pharmacie- Hôpital de la Conception
      • Montpellier, France, 34000
        • CHU-Montpellier Service Pharmacie Lapeyronie
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • CHU-NANTES Service de Pharmacie
      • Poitiers, France, 86021
        • CHU-POITIERS Service de Pharmacie
      • Reims, France, 51092
        • CHU-REIMS Service de Pharmacie -Robert Debré
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • CHU-RENNES Pôle Pharmacie, Unité de pharmacie clinique
      • Strasbourg, France, 67200
        • CHU-STRASBOURG Service Pharmacie, Hôpital Hautepierre
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • CHU-TOULOUSE Pôle Pharmacie PURPAN
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • CHU-TOURS Hôpital Bretonneau
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • CHU-TOURS-Hôpital TROUSSEAU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient having given his free, informed and express consent
  • Patient with a kidney or liver transplantation performed in the 10 participating university hospital centers
  • Patient speaking french
  • Patient whose main residence is in France and has no project of moving during the study period
  • Patient declaring to attend the same pharmacy
  • Social insured patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient protected: safeguard of justice, curatorship, tutelage
  • Patient having a double liver / kidney transplantation with a center not participating in the study
  • Patients with a double organ transplantation kidney /hart
  • Patient already transplanted regardless of the organ

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Implementation of a personalized pharmaceutical plan with a view to increasing the patient's therapeutic education in the hospital and in the community (entrance and discharge reconciliation, 3 pharmaceutical interviews in the hospital, strengthening of the community-hospital link , 3 outpatient pharmaceutical consultations)
Personalized Pharmaceutical Plan on therapeutic adherence to immunosuppressive treatments after the transplantation
No Intervention: Usual care period
No changes to usual center practices

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Therapeutic adhesion
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
The Investigator will consider that a patient is in therapeutic adhesion thanks to two methods : use of the BAASIS® questionnaire (if answer <1 for at least one of the 4 questions in the score, the patient will be considered as a non-adherent) and use of the health insurance data from the national health data system (checking that 100% of the days are covered by possession of immunosuppressive drugs)
1 year after transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drug adherence of all chronic treatments prescribed to the patient (except immunosuppression (IS) drug)
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Drug adherence of all chronic treatments prescribed to the patient (except immunosuppression (IS) drug) measured by the EvalObs® scale (graduation from 0 to 15)
1 year after transplantation
Knowledge of hygienic-dietetic rules and drug intake modalities
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Knowledge of hygienic-dietetic rules and drug intake modalities assessed using an questionnaire ( scale from 1-9)
1 year after transplantation
Occurrence of adverse effects
Time Frame: At month 1,month 3, and 12 months after transplantation
Search for the occurrence of adverse events related to IS (diabetes, hypertension, weight gain, tremor, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia,...) during medical and pharmaceutical consultations.
At month 1,month 3, and 12 months after transplantation
Fate of the graft
Time Frame: 1 year and 3 years after transplantation
Study of the fate of the graft (rejection, rejection episodes)
1 year and 3 years after transplantation
Assessing patient, medical, and community pharmacist satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Assessing patient, medical, community pharmacist and trial satisfaction (thanks to a 5-level Likert scale) with the system implemented
1 year after transplantation
Assessment of potential release risk by measuring the coefficient of variation (CV) of anticalcineurin doses
Time Frame: 3 years after transplantation
A patient with a CV greater than 30% will be considered to be at higher risk of rejection
3 years after transplantation
For kidney transplantation : testing for anti-HLA antibodies
Time Frame: 1 year and 3 years after transplantation
Anti-HLA antibodies are known to be responsible for rejection in kidney transplants: search for anti-HLA antibodies directed against the donor one and three years after the transplant by Elisa technique
1 year and 3 years after transplantation
Determining the efficiency of the implementation of the PPP
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Determining the efficiency of the implementation of this PPP in 3 different ways: by determining the cost per QALY gained at 1 year, the cost per additional patient adherent at 1 year and the cost per first functional graft in additional living patient (living patient, carrying their first graft and functional graft) at 1 year
1 year after transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Xavier POURRAT, PhD, University hospital of Tours

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 11, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DR190061-GREPH
  • 2019-A01723-54 (Registry Identifier: ID RCB)
  • 920070 (Registry Identifier: CNIL)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PPP

Subscribe