Quality Improvement Project for Advance Care Planning Tool in Hospital Medicine

May 11, 2022 updated by: Duke University

Quality Improvement Project: Assessing the Use of Advanced Care Planning Documentation for Patients at High Risk of 30-day Mortality on Hospital Medicine Services

Hospitalized patients and their families are often unprepared regarding end-of-life care. Even patients with high risk of mortality within the index admission or 30 days after admission often do not have clearly defined goals of care. This lack of clarity can create difficult scenarios for patients, their families, and care providers. Lack of communication and documentation of these goals can lead to unnecessary tests, procedures, and readmissions. By creating advanced care planning education for the hospital medicine department, a standardized note template, and EMR utilization for storage and reference of patient's goals of care documentation we aim to facilitate the conveyance of patient's wishes/preferences across different care providers and across separate encounters within the healthcare system. For this study, we will use a pre-post study design to evaluate the implementation of this quality improvement intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

743

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population for the QI project will include two groups (pre and post-implementation) in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. Both the pre-implementation and the intervention (post-implementation) groups consist of adult patients admitted to the hospital medicine service with a high risk of mortality; clinicians providing care for patients in the post-implementation group will also receive a notification of the patient's high risk of mortality and recommendation for a serious illness conversation. The evaluation has been narrowed to a pre-post study design, which will enable our team to identify the impact of the intervention.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients admitted to the inpatient medicine service with high risk of mortality.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Involuntary commitment during the index admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
High risk of mortality
Adult patients admitted to the hospital medicine service with a high risk of mortality
Goals of care discussion with patient, documentation with electronic health record note and advance care planning billing. This will also include: pharmacy review of medications, case management review, and coding specialist review.
High risk of mortality (pre-implementation)
Adult patients admitted to the hospital medicine service with a high risk of mortality

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who have advanced care planning notes completed during the admission
Time Frame: Hospital admission, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Pre-implementation)
Hospital admission, up to 7 days
Proportion of patients who have advanced care planning notes completed during the admission
Time Frame: Hospital admission, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Post-implementation)
Hospital admission, up to 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patient who have documentation utilizing the electronic health record dotphrase note template
Time Frame: Hospital admission, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Pre-implementation)
Hospital admission, up to 7 days
Proportion of patient who have documentation utilizing the electronic health record dotphrase note template
Time Frame: Hospital admission, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Post-implementation)
Hospital admission, up to 7 days
Proportion of patients who are billed for advanced care planning
Time Frame: Hospital admission, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Pre-implementation)
Hospital admission, up to 7 days
Proportion of patients who are billed for advanced care planning
Time Frame: Hospital admission, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Post-implementation)
Hospital admission, up to 7 days
Proportion of patients who receive palliative care consults
Time Frame: Hospital admission, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Pre-implementation)
Hospital admission, up to 7 days
Proportion of patients who receive palliative care consults
Time Frame: Hospital admission, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Post-implementation)
Hospital admission, up to 7 days
Proportion of patients who are discharged to hospice
Time Frame: Hospital discharge, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Pre-implementation)
Hospital discharge, up to 7 days
Proportion of patients who are discharged to hospice
Time Frame: Hospital discharge, up to 7 days
As measured by medical record review (Post-implementation)
Hospital discharge, up to 7 days
Proportion of patients who have an appointment to the palliative care clinic
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
As measured by medical record review (Pre-implementation)
Up to 1 month
Proportion of patients who have an appointment to the palliative care clinic
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
As measured by medical record review (Post-implementation)
Up to 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sendak Mark, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00104527

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advance Care Planning

Clinical Trials on Advance Care Planning Discussion

Subscribe