ED to EPI: Using SMS to Improve the Transition From the Emergency Department to Early Psychosis Intervention

March 15, 2024 updated by: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

ED to EPI: Using SMS (Text) Messaging to Improve the Transition From the Emergency Department to Early Psychosis Intervention for Young People With Psychosis

Psychosis is a disabling condition that typically has its onset in adolescence and early adulthood. Many young people with psychosis have difficulty navigating services or are reluctant to engage in treatment until their illness becomes an emergency. Consequently, nearly half of all new psychotic disorders are diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). Despite the rationale and evidence for early psychosis intervention (EPI), around half of youth do not access these services. The investigators will use short message service (SMS)/text messaging, a low-cost, low-complexity, youth-friendly approach, to improve transitions in care from the ED and related acute services to EPI services, investigating the intervention's effect on attendance at the first consultation appointment, longer term service engagement, and system-level outcomes. The investigators will also evaluate cost-effectiveness and user perspectives of the intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), the investigators will recruit a consecutive series of 186 participants aged 16 to 29 referred by the CAMH ED and related acute services to CAMH's EPI program for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a 2-way SMS intervention involving reminders, psychoeducation, and check-ins. The primary outcome will be rate of attendance at the first consultation appointment assessed through chart reviews. Secondary outcomes will include indicators of long-term service engagement as well as symptoms and functioning 6 months following study enrollment and health service utilization for up to 2 years using administrative data from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). Administrative data will be used for an economic analysis. Participants who receive the active intervention will be asked to complete a web-based survey evaluating their experience and a subgroup will be asked to participate in in-depth in-person qualitative interviews. Patients and family members with lived experience will be engaged in all aspects of the project, including shaping the intervention and study design.

The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will result in increased rate of attendance at the first EPI consultation appointment, as well as improved longer-term engagement in outpatient EPI services compared to the sham comparator. Demonstrating evidence that this low-cost, low-complexity, youth-friendly intervention improves engagement in outpatient EPI services has the potential to improve long-term outcomes for young people with psychosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J1H1
        • Recruiting
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 27 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have been referred by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) emergency department or related acute services to the CAMH early psychosis intervention (EPI) program for suspected psychosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to communicate in basic written English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active SMS Intervention
Participants assigned to the experimental arm will receive the active SMS intervention. Participants in the active intervention group who consent to participate will be asked to complete a web-based survey. Based on survey findings, purposive sampling will be used to select a subsample of 12 to 20 participants for qualitative interviews.
Welcome message letting participant know they will be contacted to book an appointment, followed by appointment reminders and other clinic information, psychoeducational materials, and a distress check-in with two-way feedback to their care team, all sent by SMS/text message at the participant's preferred time of day. If they indicate that they are in high distress, or they request, their care provider will be notified and asked to reach out to them. They will also receive crisis resources.The intervention will continue until the patient attends the first consultation appointment, or for up to 30 days if the patient does not attend, which reflects the program's practice of closing referrals for non-attending patients.
Sham Comparator: Sham SMS
Participants assigned to the sham comparator will receive the sham SMS intervention. They will not be re-contacted.
Single welcome message letting participant know they will be contacted to book an appointment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attendance at the first early psychosis intervention (EPI) consultation appointment
Time Frame: 30 days
Attendance at the outpatient EPI consultation appointment will be assessed through chart reviews and categorized as: Yes - attended at original appointment time, Yes - attended at later date within 30 days, No - did not attend appointment within 30 days.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Service engagement - absolute drop-out
Time Frame: 6 months
Absolute dropouts will be assessed through chart reviews and categorized as: Still in EPI treatment, Not accepted for EPI treatment, Accepted for EPI treatment but transitioned to local services, Accepted for EPI treatment but disengaged, or Other.
6 months
Service engagement - Service Engagement Scale (SES)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Service Engagement Scale is a brief, validated, clinician-rated tool designed to measure engagement with community mental health services. In 14 items, it assesses patients' availability for treatment, collaboration, help seeking behaviors and treatment adherence on a four-point Likert scale with total scores ranging from 0-42, and higher scores indicating difficulties in service engagement. The Service Engagement Scale total score and treatment adherence score will be extracted through chart reviews.
6 months
Change in psychotic illness as measured by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a clinician-rated measure of the patient's symptom severity and treatment response prior to and after initiating an intervention. It includes subscales for Severity and Improvement. The Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale ranges from 1-7 with higher scores indicating higher severity of illness, relative to other patients with the same diagnosis. The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale ranges from 1-7 with 4 indicating no change, 1 indicating very much improved, and 7 indicating very much worse relative to the patient's illness at the beginning of the intervention. Scores will be extracted through chart reviews.
6 months
System-level outcomes: emergency department visits
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years
Number of emergency department visits, extracted from provincial administrative data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
6 months and 2 years
System-level outcomes: mental health hospitalizations
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years
Number of mental health hospitalizations, extracted from provincial administrative data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
6 months and 2 years
System-level outcomes: days in mental health hospitalizations
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years
Number of days in mental health hospitalizations, extracted from provincial administrative data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
6 months and 2 years
System-level outcomes: outpatient mental health visits with primary care provider
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years
Number of outpatient mental health visits with primary care provider, extracted from provincial administrative data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
6 months and 2 years
System-level outcomes: outpatient mental health visits with psychiatrist
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years
Number of outpatient mental health visits with psychiatrist, extracted from provincial administrative data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
6 months and 2 years
System-level outcomes: continuous prescriptions
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years
For participants with provincial drug coverage, continuous vs. non-continuous prescriptions for antipsychotic or mood stabilizer medications, extracted from provincial administrative data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
6 months and 2 years
System-level outcomes: mortality
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years
Mortality, extracted from provincial administrative data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
6 months and 2 years
Health care costs
Time Frame: 6 months and 2 years
Total direct patient-level health care costs incurred by the public third-party payer based on administrative data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) using an established costing algorithm
6 months and 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: George Foussias, MD, PhD, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Principal Investigator: Aristotle N Voineskos, MD, PhD, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Principal Investigator: Vicky Stergiopoulos, MD, MHSc, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Principal Investigator: Albert HC Wong, MD, PhD, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Principal Investigator: Nicole Kozloff, MD, SM, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual patient data (IPD) other than system-level data held at ICES will be available upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 12 months of posting the study results on this website

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the study's Steering Committee and after Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Active SMS Intervention

3
Subscribe