Open Dialogue About Complementary Alternative Medicine

January 9, 2023 updated by: Vejle Hospital

The Efficacy of Open Dialogue About Complementary Alternative Medicine Integrated in Conventional Oncology Care. Patient Reported Quality of Life and Well-being (CAMONCO 2)

The purpose of this phase III parallel-group randomized controlled trial is to assess the efficacy of open dialogue about complementary alternative medicine integrated in conventional oncology care (ODC-COC). The investigators hypothesize that patients in the intervention group participating in an ODC-COC with a nurse specialist report better quality of life compared to patients in the control group receiving standard care alone.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients randomized to the intervention group will participate in a scheduled ODC-COC with a specialist nurse, who has completed the Fellowship in Integrative Medicine at the University of Arizona. This is a training program for health professionals in empowering individuals and communities to optimize health and well-being through evidence-based, sustainable and integrative approaches. The ODC-COC will be based on the fundamentals of person-centered care according to this program and include patient preferences and wishes, reliable information and counselling and advice about the potential risks and benefits of using complementary alternative medicine as an adjunct to conventional oncology care.

The dialogue lasts approximately 60 minutes and will take place as soon as possible and no later than two weeks after enrolment. The same nurse will conduct all dialogues. According to patient needs and wishes there may be a follow-up dialogue over the telephone or in the Oncology Outpatient Clinic. The potential second dialogue is estimated to last approximately 30 minutes.

Participants in the control group will receive standard information including reference to www.KABcancer.dk, which is a website presenting research on CAM, including information about its potential effects and outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vejle, Denmark, 7100
        • Vejle Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Speaks and reads Danish
  • Diagnosed with a new primary cancer or a relapse of cancer within the last 3 months
  • Planned or initiated medical oncology treatment at the Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital
  • At least two months of oncology treatment is realistic based on clinical assessment
  • Life expectancy of at least six months
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

-Participation in other trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Open dialogue about CAM (ODC-COC)

Participation in an open dialogue about CAM with a nurse specialist. The dialogue will be based on the fundamentals of person-centered care and include patient preferences and wishes, reliable information and counselling, and advice about the potential risks and benefits of using CAM.

The dialogue is estimated to last approximately 60 minutes and all dialogues will be conducted by the same nurse. Depending on patient needs and wishes there may be a follow-up consultation one month after the first dialogue.

1-hour dialogue about CAM with a nurse specialist as an integrated part of conventional oncology care
No Intervention: Standard care
Standard care including referral to a homepage about complementary alternative medicine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in patient reported quality of life between the two arms at 8 weeks as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ CAT core)
Time Frame: 8 weeks after enrollment
This instrument lists individually tailored questions assessing quality of life, including functional scales, symptom scales, global health status, and psychosocial scales.
8 weeks after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in patient reported quality of life between the two arms at 12 and 24 weeks as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ CAT Core).
Time Frame: At baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks
This instrument lists individually tailored questions assessing quality of life, including functional scales, symptom scales, global health status, and psychosocial scales.
At baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks
Difference in patient reported level of depression and anxiety between the two arms as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Time Frame: At baseline and 8, 12 and 24 weeks after enrollment
With 14 questions this instrument assesses the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression.
At baseline and 8, 12 and 24 weeks after enrollment
Difference in patient reported top concerns in the two arms as measured by the Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW) questionnaire.
Time Frame: At baseline and 8, 12 and 24 weeks after enrollment
This instrument assesses the level of severity of the two most pressing concerns and present overall well-being
At baseline and 8, 12 and 24 weeks after enrollment
Difference in patient reported decision regret in the two arms as measured by the Decision Regret Scale (DRS).
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after enrollment
This instrument consists of 5 items elucidating if regret is present, whether the decision is the right one, and whether the patient would make the same decision again.
At baseline and 8 weeks after enrollment
Difference in overall survival between the two arms
Time Frame: 12 months after enrollment of last patient
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis
12 months after enrollment of last patient

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 11, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Open dialogue about CAM

3
Subscribe