Radiologist Diagnostic Performance Versus Artificial Intelligence (AI) (RAVIA)

April 13, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Retrospective Study Comparing Radiologist Diagnostic Performance Versus Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Hip Fracture Suspicion in Elderly Patients

In France, femoral neck fracture is mainly detected with interpretation of pelvis/hip X-ray imaging (French Health Authority recommandation).

However, up to 10% of fractures are not identified or misdiagnosed, especially in patients admitted to the emergency department.

Indeed, radiologists may be subject to excessive work, wich cause the risk of inaccurate on X-rays diagnosis.

The Artificial intelligence (AI) begins study the detection of fratures on medical imaging.

In this retropective study, this technology developed by GLEAMER company is tested to evaluate the detection rate of hip fracture and specifically femoral neck fracture, compared to the radiologist diagnostic, in eldery patients admitted in emergency department.

AI could optimize the diagnostic performance of radiologists (increase of confidence level) and improve the efficiency of suspected fractures sorting from emergency department.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Uhmontpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged 60 and older, admitted to emergency department for painful hip/fonctional impotence after minor trauma.

Patients take at least a hip radiography

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients aged 60 and older
  • Minor trauma
  • Admitted in emergency department for painful hip/fonctional impotence after minor trauma
  • Takes at least a hip radiography

Exclusion criteria:

  • Painful before the minor trauma
  • Important trauma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Suspicion of hip fracture
hip standard radiography/ CT scan/ MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection rate of femoral neck fracture
Time Frame: 1 day
Detection rate of femoral neck fracture
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection rate of other hip fracture
Time Frame: 1 day
Detection rate of other hip fracture
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Catherine CYTEVAL, MD.PhD, University Hospital, Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

NC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Painful Hip

Clinical Trials on hip standard radiography/ CT scan/ MRI

3
Subscribe