Atrial Fibrillation After CABG and PCI (AFAF)

April 26, 2022 updated by: Anders Ahlsson, Region Örebro County
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia seen in clinical practice and is associated with an increased risk of stroke, heart failure and death. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the only treatment so far being able to reduce mortality in AF patients, despite new antiarrhythmic drugs and ablation techniques. Postoperative AF affects one-third of patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery (CABG). Postoperative AF is associated with an increased 30-day mortality compared to patients who are in sinus rhythm during the hospital stay. . The risk of future AF is increased in patients with postoperative AF, and one-fourth of patients with an episode of postoperative AF develop later AF. At six years follow-up, 9.1% of patients with postoperative AF have had a lethal or non-lethal episode of ischemic stroke, compared to 3.0% of patients in SR (p=.002). Atrial fibrillation is a common complication of myocardial infarction, with an incidence of new-onset AF between 5-20%. New-onset AF occurs postoperatively in 5-6% of patients undergoing acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and is marker of adverse outcomes. However, studies of heart rhythm beyond the post procedural period following PCI are lacking. About one third of all AF is asymptomatic, silent and often paroxysmal. The risk of stroke seems to be the same for silent AF as for those with symptomatic AF. In trials comparing PCI and CABG, there is a consistent difference in stroke rate. Several studies have shown an increased risk of late cardiovascular death and ischemic stroke in postoperative AF patients, and the difference in stroke rate between PCI and CABG may be explained by unprotected episodes of AF after discharge. The investigators therefore hypothesize that patients undergoing CABG have an increased risk of silent AF postoperatively compared to patients undergoing PCI and that this difference may explain some of the differences in stroke rate between PCI and CABG patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia seen in clinical practice and is associated with an increased risk of stroke, heart failure and Death. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the only treatment so far being able to reduce mortality in AF patients, despite new antiarrhythmic drugs and ablation techniques.

Postoperative AF affects one-third of patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery (CABG). It is typically characterized by an episode of AF lasting 24-48 hours, starting at the second postoperative day, and affected patients are usually discharged in sinus rhythm. Postoperative AF is associated with an increased 30-day mortality compared to patients who are in sinus rhythm during the hospital stay. Later studies have shown that CABG patients with an episode of postoperative AF have an increased long-term mortality compared to patients in sinus rhythm (SR). In particular, patients with postoperative AF have a doubled cardiovascular long-term mortality, mainly explained by an increased risk of fatal ischemic stroke and cardiac death. The risk of future AF is increased in patients with postoperative AF, and one-fourth of patients with an episode of postoperative AF develop later AF. At six years follow-up, 9.1% of patients with postoperative AF have had a lethal or non-lethal episode of ischemic stroke, compared to 3.0% of patients in SR (p=.002).

All patients undergoing CABG are offered single or dual antiplatelet therapy depending on the presence of drug-eluting stents and type of coronary artery disease. Antiplatelet therapy does not offer any protection of thromboembolic disease in patients with AF. The indication for anticoagulation in patients with an episode of postoperative AF is basically not different from other types of AF. Given the short duration of a typical episode of postoperative AF, warfarin is seldom prescribed at discharge (3.6% in one study).

Atrial fibrillation is a common complication of myocardial infarction, with an incidence of new-onset AF between 5-20%. New-onset AF occurs postoperatively in 5-6% of patients undergoing acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and is marker of adverse outcomes. However, studies of heart rhythm beyond the post procedural period following PCI are lacking.

About one third of all AF is asymptomatic, silent and often paroxysmal. The risk of stroke seems to be the same for silent AF as for those with symptomatic AF. Screening for silent AF using handheld ambulatory ECG recorders has proven to be an effective way of capturing episodes of AF and superior to 24 hour Holter recordings.

In trials comparing PCI and CABG, there is a consistent difference in stroke rate. In the Syntax trial, the stroke incidence at one-year follow-up was 2.2% in the CABG group compared to 0.6% in the PCI group. In the Freedom trial, the stroke incidence at five years was 5.2% in the CABG group and 2.4% in the PCI group. Of note, differences in the incidence of postoperative AF or treatment with OAC were not recorded in these trials.

In conclusion, several studies have shown an increased risk of late cardiovascular death and ischemic stroke in postoperative AF patients, and the difference in stroke rate between PCI and CABG may be explained by unprotected episodes of AF after discharge.

The investigators therefore hypothesize that patients undergoing CABG have an increased risk of silent AF postoperatively compared to patients undergoing PCI and that this difference may explain some of the differences in stroke rate between PCI and CABG patients. This study can improve AF detection in patient cohorts and by initiating OAC also in patients with silent AF potentially decrease the risk of stroke.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Örebro, Sweden
        • Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular surgery, Örebro University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing CABG or PCI due to:

  • NSTEMI
  • stable angina
  • unstable angina
  • with no prior history of atrial fibrillation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • NSTEMI
  • Stable or unstable angina requiring revascularization therapy.
  • No prior hitory of Atrial Fibrillation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous History of Atrial Fibrillation.
  • Any condition that contraindicates oral anticoagulation treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CABG
Patients whom has undergone CABG surgery for NSTEMI, stable or unstable angina, with no previous history of Atrial Fibrillation
Handheld Thumb ECG monitoring device
PCI
Patients whom has undergone PCI for NSTEMI, stable or unstable angina, with no previous history of Atrial Fibrillation
Handheld Thumb ECG monitoring device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Incidence of Postoperative/postinterventional Atrial Fibrillation
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Oral Anticoagulation treatment to those who develope Atrial fibrillation
Time Frame: During 2 years of follow-up

Oral Anticoagulation treatment to those who develope Atrial fibrillation, according to individual risk assessment by CHA2D2VASC score (Congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, sex - score, min 0 Points (good), max 9 Points):

  • Congestive heart failure 1p
  • Uncontrolled hypertension 1p
  • Age ≥ 75 years 2p
  • Age 65-74 years 1p
  • Diabetes 1p
  • Stroke / TIA / Thromboembolism 2p
  • Vascular disease 1p
  • Female gender 1p

    2p or more warrants oral anticoagulation, if no contraindication given individual predictive bleeding assessment.

During 2 years of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively
Predictive markers for development of postoperative/postinterventional Atrial Fibrillation
1 month, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Zenicor

3
Subscribe