- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04307680
Evaluation and Comparison of Efficacy Between Extracorporeal Magnetic Innervation and High-intensity Kegel Exercise Regimen in Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Female (KEMS-CRO)
August 24, 2020 updated by: Mislav Mikuš, University of Zagreb
Evaluation and Comparison of Short-term Efficacy Between Extracorporeal Magnetic Innervation and High-intensity Kegel Exercise Regimen
The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled study is to evaluate and compare efficacy between the most available conservative treatment (magnetic stimulation and Kegel exercise) for stress urinary incontinence in Croatia.
We will assess quality-of-life, patient global improvement, and vaginal pressure measured with perineometer in three different time points: at the enrollment, after 8 weeks of treatment and 3 months after the both treatments are done.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zagreb, Croatia, 10 000
- Recruiting
- Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia
-
Contact:
- Mislav Mikuš, MD
- Phone Number: + 385 1 460 4646
- Email: m.mikus19@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- urodinamically confirmed stress urinary incontinence, at least one vaginal delivery in gynecological history.
Exclusion Criteria:
- urinary tract malignancies, vulvovaginitis, current uroinfection, previous pelvic surgeries, neurologic and psychiatric diseases, previous conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in less than 6 months, Stage III and IV of genital prolapse, latex allergy.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Kegel exercise
Using high-intensity Kegel exercise regimen for 8 weeks (5 times a week; 3 times a day involved; 3 sets of 10-12 contractions)
|
Perineometry will be used to assess quality of each observed treatment modality.
|
|
Active Comparator: Magnetic stimulation
Using 16 extracorporeal magnetic innervation treatments during 8 weeks (2 times a week).
|
Perineometry will be used to assess quality of each observed treatment modality.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Greater proportion of reduced ICIQ-SF score in magnetic stimulation arm group after 8 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 8 weeks from the start of the treatment
|
We assume that after 8 weeks of treatment, in magnetic stimulation arm of study, we will observe more treatment ''responders'' - with at least 4-point reduction in overall ICIQ-SF score
|
8 weeks from the start of the treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Greater proportion of increased perineometry value in magnetic stimulation arm group
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
We assume that after 8 weeks of treatment, in magnetic stimulation arm of study, we will observe more treatment ''responders'' - at least more than 30% of increase in overall vaginal pressure, measured by a Peritron perineometer
|
8 weeks
|
|
Greater proportion of better patient global improvement in magnetic stimulation arm group
Time Frame: 3 months from treatment finish
|
We assume that after 3 months of treatment finish, in magnetic stimulation arm of study, we will observe more women who are satisfied with the treatment, compared to Kegel exercise arm - using Patient Global Improvement Score (PGI-I)
|
3 months from treatment finish
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 2, 2020
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
January 2, 2021
Study Completion (Anticipated)
January 10, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 10, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
March 13, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 25, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 24, 2020
Last Verified
August 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UniZG
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Yes
IPD Sharing Time Frame
From February 2021.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
- Informed Consent Form (ICF)
- Clinical Study Report (CSR)
- Analytic Code
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); Stanford...CompletedUrinary Incontinence, Stress | Urge Incontinence | Urinary Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Urinary | Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Female | Urgency UrinaryUnited States
-
Juna d.o.o.CompletedFemale Stress Urinary Incontinence | Mixed Incontinence, Urge and Stress
-
Université de SherbrookeRecruitingUrinary Incontinence | Urinary Stress Incontinence | Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, MaleCanada
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalRecruitingWomen With Stress Urinary IncontinenceTaiwan
-
University Magna GraeciaUnknownStress Urinary IncontinenceItaly
-
University of California, IrvineWithdrawnStress Urinary IncontinenceUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyBoehringer IngelheimCompleted
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyBoehringer IngelheimCompletedUrinary Stress IncontinenceUnited States
-
GT Urological, LLCCompletedMale Stress Urinary IncontinenceAustralia, Czechia, New Zealand
-
Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education...CompletedFemale Urinary Stress IncontinenceTurkey
Clinical Trials on Peritron perineometer
-
Laborie Medical Technologies Inc.Completed
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingStress Urinary IncontinenceEgypt
-
Iqra National UniversityCompleted