Evaluation and Comparison of Efficacy Between Extracorporeal Magnetic Innervation and High-intensity Kegel Exercise Regimen in Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Female (KEMS-CRO)

August 24, 2020 updated by: Mislav Mikuš, University of Zagreb

Evaluation and Comparison of Short-term Efficacy Between Extracorporeal Magnetic Innervation and High-intensity Kegel Exercise Regimen

The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled study is to evaluate and compare efficacy between the most available conservative treatment (magnetic stimulation and Kegel exercise) for stress urinary incontinence in Croatia. We will assess quality-of-life, patient global improvement, and vaginal pressure measured with perineometer in three different time points: at the enrollment, after 8 weeks of treatment and 3 months after the both treatments are done.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zagreb, Croatia, 10 000
        • Recruiting
        • Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • urodinamically confirmed stress urinary incontinence, at least one vaginal delivery in gynecological history.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • urinary tract malignancies, vulvovaginitis, current uroinfection, previous pelvic surgeries, neurologic and psychiatric diseases, previous conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in less than 6 months, Stage III and IV of genital prolapse, latex allergy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Kegel exercise
Using high-intensity Kegel exercise regimen for 8 weeks (5 times a week; 3 times a day involved; 3 sets of 10-12 contractions)
Perineometry will be used to assess quality of each observed treatment modality.
Active Comparator: Magnetic stimulation
Using 16 extracorporeal magnetic innervation treatments during 8 weeks (2 times a week).
Perineometry will be used to assess quality of each observed treatment modality.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Greater proportion of reduced ICIQ-SF score in magnetic stimulation arm group after 8 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 8 weeks from the start of the treatment
We assume that after 8 weeks of treatment, in magnetic stimulation arm of study, we will observe more treatment ''responders'' - with at least 4-point reduction in overall ICIQ-SF score
8 weeks from the start of the treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Greater proportion of increased perineometry value in magnetic stimulation arm group
Time Frame: 8 weeks
We assume that after 8 weeks of treatment, in magnetic stimulation arm of study, we will observe more treatment ''responders'' - at least more than 30% of increase in overall vaginal pressure, measured by a Peritron perineometer
8 weeks
Greater proportion of better patient global improvement in magnetic stimulation arm group
Time Frame: 3 months from treatment finish
We assume that after 3 months of treatment finish, in magnetic stimulation arm of study, we will observe more women who are satisfied with the treatment, compared to Kegel exercise arm - using Patient Global Improvement Score (PGI-I)
3 months from treatment finish

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 2, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From February 2021.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Peritron perineometer

Subscribe