A Human Factor Study To Asses The Usability And Feasibility Of The Peritron+ During Intended Use

November 15, 2016 updated by: Laborie Medical Technologies Inc.
In a hospital setting, the self-measurement of intravesical pressure (SMIP) assessment will be conducted at full and empty bladder using the Peritron+ and a ruler-based manometry method. In the home setting a human factor/usability study will be conducted to measure the subject's ability to perform a successful SMIP assessment at full and empty bladder with the Peritron+. This study involves the use of the Peritron+, Air-Trap Tubing, a ruler and a clean intermittent catheter (CIC).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children (2 to 18 years old)
  • Subjects who perform CIC regularly
  • Must be able to understand English instructions (written or oral)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects suffering from symptomatic bladder infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peritron+
SMIP assessment using Peritron+, Air-Trap Tubing, and a conventional CIC catheter
Peritron+ device to measure intravesical pressure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability Factors; Simple, Doable, and is Comparable to the Ruler-based Manometry Method Using a Questionnaire and Patient Diary.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 days
Each participant could score between 0 and 39 and the total score range for group is 0 to 195. All questionnaires and patient diary questions were summed across the board for patients to derive a total score for the Arm/Group
Through study completion, an average of 4 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PLUS-HF-01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urology

Clinical Trials on Peritron+

3
Subscribe