Topically Applied AMTX-100 CF for Adult Patients With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

April 30, 2025 updated by: Amytrx Therapeutics, Inc.

A Two Part, Phase I/II, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Topically Applied AMTX-100 CF in Adult Patients With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

This study determines the Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) by maximum BSA percentage treated and evaluates safety and efficacy of 1.1% w/w AMTX-100 CF versus placebo (vehicle).

The study has two parts:

Phase I (Part 1):

Approximately Twenty-five (25) subjects with various treatable Body Surface Area (BSA) involvement of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis will be enrolled in the study and treated with 1.1% w/w AMTX-100 CF.

Phase II (Part 2):

Approximately sixty (60) subjects with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis with various treatable BSA involvement of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis will be randomized to be treated with 1.1% w/w AMTX-100 CF3 concentration or Vehicle (Placebo) in the study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

AMTX-100 CF3 drug product is formulated as a water-based, topical cream incorporating a 28-amino acid synthetic polypeptide (AMTX-100) as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). AMTX-100 is a chimeric, cell-penetrating, bifunctional nuclear transport modifier (NTM), that is engineered to modulate nuclear transport of transcription factors (NF-κB, NFAT, AP-1, and STAT1) involved in the activation of gene expression of key mediators of inflammation (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, MCP-1, etc.) and metabolic syndrome (ChREBP and SREBP) by importin α/β complex and importin β, respectively. This further leads to a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine production and lipid and carbohydrate metabolic products.

AMTX-100 CF3 is intended to improve symptoms associated with mild to moderate Atopic Dermatitis in adults. This Phase I/II study aims to determine the Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) by maximum BSA percentage treated and to evaluate efficacy of 1.1% w/w AMTX-100 CF3 versus placebo (vehicle).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Cerritos, California, United States, 90703
        • Amytrx Investigational site
      • Encino, California, United States, 91436
        • Amytrx Investigational site
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90805
        • Amytrx Investigational site
      • North Hollywood, California, United States, 91606
        • Amytrx Investigational site
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Amytrx Investigational site
      • Sherman Oaks, California, United States, 91403
        • Amytrx Investigational site
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33175
        • Amytrx Investigational site
      • Miramar, Florida, United States, 33027
        • Amytrx Investigational site
    • Michigan
      • Troy, Michigan, United States, 48084
        • Amytrx Investigational site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 11415
        • Amytrx Investigational site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103
        • Amytrx Investigational site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Part 1 Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects are required to meet ALL of the following criteria for enrollment into the Phase I (Part 1) of the study:

  1. Male or female subjects who are 18 years or older
  2. If female and not infertile (defined below), the subject must agree for the duration of the study to use one of the following forms of contraception 1) systemic hormonal treatment 2) an intrauterine device (IUD) which was implanted at least 2 months prior to screening or 3) "double-barrier" contraception (condom, diaphragm and spermicide are each considered a barrier). Females are considered to be infertile if they are either a) surgically sterile or b) have had spontaneous amenorrhea for at least the last 2 years and at least 2 years after the onset of amenorrhea while not receiving hormone replacement therapy and had a Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) level greater than 40 mIU/mL and an estradiol level less than 30 pg/mL
  3. All fertile female subjects as described above need to have a negative urine pregnancy test at the screening and baseline visits
  4. Subject is capable of providing informed consent and is willing to sign the ICF prior to study Screening and agrees to comply with the study protocol requirements
  5. Subject is able to apply topical products on all treatable assigned areas by self and/or caregiver (if applicable), per the Investigator
  6. Subject is in general good physical/mental health per the Investigator
  7. Subject's Total Body Surface Area (BSA) is between 1.5 and 2.1 m2 per the Mosteller formula
  8. The subject has physician confirmed mild to moderate Atopic Dermatitis (AD) defined by the Eichenfield revised criteria of Hannifin and Rajka, for at least 6 months prior to study enrollment
  9. Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) score of 2 or 3 (mild to moderate) at the screening and baseline visits
  10. Subject has Atopic Dermatitis (AD) involvement with eligible treatable percent of the BSA appropriate for topical treatment per the assigned cohort at the screening and baseline visits per below:

    1. Cohort 1: 3% BSA ≤ AD Affected Area ≤ 6% BSA
    2. Cohort 2: 6% BSA < AD Affected Area ≤ 12% BSA
    3. Cohort 3: 12% BSA < AD Affected Area ≤ 24% BSA
    4. Cohort 4: 24% BSA < AD Affected Area ≤ 48% BSA
    5. Cohort 5: 48% BSA < AD Affected Area ≤ 70% BSA

Note: Calculation of Treatable BSA percentage (% of the total BSA that is AD-involved, excluding the scalp, face, eyes, eyelids, neck, hands, palms, feet, groin, genitals or axillae) will be completed by the method below:

o "Handprint Method": the area represented by the palm with all five digits adducted together is approximately 1% of the subject's BSA

Part 1 Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects are required to meet NONE of the following criteria for enrollment into the Phase I (Part 1) of the study:

  1. Pregnant or lactating females or women who are planning for pregnancy in the next 6 months
  2. Women at postpartum for 3 months or less prior to screening
  3. Serious medical illnesses such as end-stage renal disease, liver failure or heart failure that, in the opinion of the Investigator may interfere with the conduct of the study
  4. Subjects with abnormal vital signs, physical and dermatological exams or clinical laboratory evaluations considered clinically significant by the Principal Investigator, which in the opinion of the PI would significantly interfere with the study conduct
  5. Subjects with any concurrent skin condition that could interfere with the evaluation of the treatment areas, as determined by the investigator
  6. The subject has a planned major surgical intervention for a pre-existing condition within the duration of the study
  7. The subject has a history of drug or alcohol abuse that would impair or risk the subject's full participation in the study, in the opinion of the investigator.
  8. Participation in a clinical trial within 3 months, or more than two clinical trials within 12 months prior to screening
  9. Concurrent or recent use of topical steroids, topical immunosuppressive/immunomodulative drugs, topical vitamin D3 derivative, topical retinoids, anthralin, coal tar (except when used as shampoo) or salicylic acid within 14 days of the baseline visit
  10. The subject has severe AD as determined by vIGA-AD™ score higher than 3
  11. The subject cannot avoid systemic treatments (including systemic corticosteroids, immunotherapy, biologics or phototherapy) for AD during the study per the Investigator
  12. The subject has previously received any systemic treatments, immunotherapy, biologics or phototherapy for AD within 12 months prior to study enrollment
  13. Current or expected use of prohibited medications as described in Section 7, unless approved by the study Medical Monitor
  14. The subject has concurrent contact dermatitis or history of anaphylactic reaction

Part 2 Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects are required to meet ALL of the following criteria for randomization into the Phase II (Part 2) of the study:

  1. Male or female subjects who are 18 years or older.
  2. If female and not infertile (defined below), the subject must agree for the duration of the study to use one of the following forms of contraception 1) systemic hormonal treatment 2) an intrauterine device (IUD) which was implanted at least 2 months prior to screening or 3) "double-barrier" contraception (condom, diaphragm and spermicide are each considered a barrier). Females are considered to be infertile if they are either a) surgically sterile or b) have had spontaneous amenorrhea for at least the last 2 years and at least 2 years after the onset of amenorrhea while not receiving hormone replacement therapy.
  3. All fertile female subjects as described above need to have a negative urine pregnancy test at the screening and baseline visits.
  4. Subject is capable of providing informed consent and is willing to sign the ICF prior to study Screening and agrees to comply with the study protocol requirements.
  5. Subject is able to apply topical products on all the treatable areas by self and/or caregiver (if applicable), per the Investigator.
  6. Subject is willing and able to comply with all clinic visits and study-related procedures.
  7. Subject is able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires.
  8. The subject has physician confirmed mild to moderate Atopic Dermatitis (AD) defined by the Eichenfield revised criteria of Hannifin and Rajka, for at least 6 months prior to study enrollment.
  9. Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) score of 2 or 3 (mild to moderate) at the screening and baseline visits.
  10. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score lower than 23 at the screening and baseline visits
  11. Subject has Atopic Dermatitis (AD) involvement of between 5% and 30% of the treatable BSA (excluding the scalp, face, eyes, eyelids, hands, palms, feet, groin, genitals or the axillae) appropriate for topical treatment at the screening and baseline visits.

    Note: Calculation of Treatable BSA percentage (% of the total BSA that is AD-involved, excluding the scalp, face, eyes, eyelids, hands, palms, feet, groin, genitals or the axillae) will be completed by the "Rule of Nines" method:

    o Where values of 9% or 18% of BSA are assigned to specific regions in the adult subject (head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%])

  12. Subjects must be applying stable doses of an additive-free, basic bland emollient twice-daily for at least 1 week immediately before the baseline visit (Visit 2, Day 0), and to be continued throughout the study.

Note: The additive-free, basic bland emollients should be applied no earlier than 1 hour before or after the administration of the study treatment.

Part 2 Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects are required to meet NONE of the following criteria for randomization into the Phase II (Part 2) of the study:

  1. Pregnant or lactating females or women who are planning for pregnancy in the next 6 months
  2. Women at postpartum for 3 months or less prior to screening
  3. Serious medical illnesses such as end-stage renal disease, liver failure or heart failure that, in the opinion of the Investigator may interfere with the conduct of the study
  4. Subjects with abnormal vital signs, physical and dermatological exams or clinical laboratory evaluations considered clinically significant by the Principal Investigator, which in the opinion of the PI would significantly interfere with the study conduct
  5. Subjects with any concurrent skin condition that could interfere with the evaluation of the treatment areas, as determined by the investigator
  6. The subject has a planned major surgical intervention for a pre-existing condition within the duration of the study
  7. The subject has a history of drug or alcohol abuse that would impair or risk the subject's full participation in the study, in the opinion of the investigator.
  8. Participation in a clinical trial within 3 months, or more than two clinical trials within 12 months prior to screening
  9. Concurrent or recent use of prescription moisturizers, topical steroids, topical immunosuppressive/immunomodulative drugs, topical vitamin D3 derivative, topical retinoids, anthralin, coal tar (except when used as shampoo) or salicylic acid within 14 days of the baseline visit
  10. The subject has severe AD as determined by vIGA-AD™ score higher than 3
  11. The subject cannot avoid systemic treatments (including systemic corticosteroids, immunotherapy, biologics or phototherapy) for AD during the study per the Investigator
  12. The subject has previously received any systemic treatments, immunotherapy, biologics or phototherapy for AD within 12 months prior to study enrollment
  13. Current or expected use of prohibited medications and procedures during study treatment, as described in Section 7, unless approved by the study Medical Monitor
  14. Subject has unstable AD or any consistent requirement for high-potency topical corticosteroids to manage AD signs and symptoms
  15. Subject has a significant active systemic or localized infection, including known actively infected AD
  16. Regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks of the screening visit
  17. The subject has previously received AMTX-100 CF
  18. Subject has any other medical or psychological condition (including relevant laboratory abnormalities at screening) that, in the opinion of the investigator, may suggest a new and/or insufficiently understood disease, may present an unreasonable risk to the study patient as a result of his/her participation in this clinical trial, may make patient's participation unreliable, or may interfere with study assessments
  19. The subject has concurrent contact dermatitis; or history of anaphylactic reaction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Part 2 Group A: 1.1% w/w
AMTX-100 CF3 (1.1% w/w), topically applied twice a day for 28 consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas
AMTX-100 CF3, topical cream with 1.1% w/w active pharmaceutical ingredient
Other Names:
  • part2
Placebo Comparator: Part 2 Group B: Placebo
Placebo (Vehicle) (0% w/w), topically applied twice a day for 28 consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas
Topical cream manufactured to mimic AMTX-100 CF3
Other Names:
  • placebo (vehicle 0% w/w)
Experimental: Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA
Open-label, five (5) cohorts were sequentially enrolled. AMTX-100 CF 1.1% w/w, topically applied twice a day for 7 consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas from 3% to 70% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) (3% BSA ≤ AD Affected Area ≤ 70% BSA)
AMTX-100 CF, topical cream with 1.1% w/w active pharmaceutical ingredient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part 1 (Phase I) Primary: Maximum Tolerable Dose
Time Frame: Over the 7-day treatment period
Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) by maximum percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) treated, by evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of AMTX-100 CF (1.1% w/w concentration) based on the safety profile
Over the 7-day treatment period
Part 2 (Phase II) Primary: Proportion of Responder Subjects at Day 28
Time Frame: Day 28

Proportion of responder subjects at Day 28, defined as subjects with both Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (on a 5-point scale) and a reduction of ≥ 2 points from baseline

Note: Subjects who have received rescue treatments will be considered non-responders

Note: We acknowledge that the "percentage" was reported, while the outcome measure indicates "proportion". It was concluded that using "percentage" represents the results more apparent.

Day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Time Frame: Baseline to Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
The 5-point Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) is a validated measure of disease severity and success of atopic dermatitis treatments in clinical trials. The ratings (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) are an overall assessment of AD skin lesions, based on the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Baseline to Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline
Time Frame: Days 7, 14, 21, and 28

The 5-point Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) is a validated measure of disease severity and success of atopic dermatitis treatments in clinical trials. The ratings (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) are an overall assessment of AD skin lesions, based on the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

Note: We acknowledge that the "percentage" is reported, while the outcome measure indicates "proportion". It was concluded that using "percentage" represents the results more apparent.

Days 7, 14, 21, and 28
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42
Time Frame: Baseline to Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure to assess the severity and extent of AD (Hanifin et al., 2001). The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where a higher score indicates increased extent and severity of atopic dermatitis.
Baseline to Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Time Frame: Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42

The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where a higher score indicates increased extent and severity of atopic dermatitis.

Note: We acknowledge that the "percentage" is reported, while the outcome measure indicates "proportion". It was concluded that using "percentage" represents the results more apparent.

Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Time Frame: Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42

The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where a higher score indicates increased extent and severity of atopic dermatitis.

Note: We acknowledge that the "percentage" is reported, while the outcome measure indicates "proportion". It was concluded that using "percentage" represents the results more apparent.

Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42

The Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a simple assessment tool that subjects used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Subjects were asked the following questions:

• For maximum itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?"

Note: The weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS was calculated by summing the daily scores for a week and dividing by the number of days with recorded scores, resulting in a range of 0 to 10.

Baseline, Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS ≥ 3 From Baseline at Day 28 and 42
Time Frame: Days 28 and 42

The Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a simple assessment tool that subjects used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Subjects were asked the following questions:

• For maximum itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?"

Note: The weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS was calculated by summing the daily scores for a week and dividing by the number of days with recorded scores, resulting in a range of 0 to 10.

Note: We acknowledge that the "percentage" is reported, while the outcome measure indicates "proportion". It was concluded that using "percentage" represents the results more apparent.

Days 28 and 42
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Day 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 28
The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a 10-item, validated questionnaire to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The format is a simple response (0 to 3 where 0 is "not at all" and 3 is "very much") to 10 questions, which assess QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring system of 0 to 30. A high score is indicative of a poor QOL. For general inflammatory skin conditions, a change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered clinically important
Baseline, Day 28
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 28, and 42
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 28, and 42

For Part 2, BSA affected by AD was assessed by the investigator per calculation of treatable % BSA by the "Rule of Nines" method:

Values of 9% or 18% of surface area are assigned to specific regions in the adult (head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%])

Baseline, Days 28, and 42

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 7
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 7

For Part 1, Body surface area (BSA) affected by AD was assessed by the investigator per calculation of treatable % BSA by the handprint method:

"Handprint Method": the area represented by the palm with all five digits adducted together is approximately 1% of the subject's BSA

Baseline, Day 7
Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 7
The 5-point Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) is a validated measure of disease severity and success of atopic dermatitis treatments in clinical trials. The ratings (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) are an overall assessment of AD skin lesions, based on the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Baseline, Day 7
Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline through follow-up (Day 21)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment.
Baseline through follow-up (Day 21)
Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline through follow-up (Day 42)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment.
Baseline through follow-up (Day 42)
Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs
Time Frame: Baseline through follow-up (Day 42)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment.
Baseline through follow-up (Day 42)
Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs
Time Frame: Baseline through follow-up (Day 21)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment.
Baseline through follow-up (Day 21)
Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline (post-dose), End of Treatment (Day 7), and Follow-up (Day 21)
Tolerability of topically applied AMTX-100 CF was evaluated based on investigator-assessed application site reactions assessment. Local skin reactions were assessed in all areas treated with AMTX-100 CF and graded by the investigator on a scale of 0 to 4 based on the area with the most severe skin reaction among all treated areas. A grade of 0 represented no reaction, and a grade of 4 indicated a marked and severe skin reaction that extended beyond the treated areas.
Baseline (post-dose), End of Treatment (Day 7), and Follow-up (Day 21)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Arezou Bayat, MD, MPH, Amarex Clinical Research, LLC (Amarex)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe