Using Clinical Process Indicators, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) to Improve the Quality and Continuity of Care for Psychiatric Patients (PROM-PREM)

March 18, 2020 updated by: Shalvata Mental Health Center
The objective of the proposed study is to take a further step in this direction by developing, implementing and monitoring a routine systematic evaluation of clinical process and outcome indicators, patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) to study the quality and continuity of care over time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Monitoring quality of care in the context of psychiatric hospitalization is crucial. The Israeli National quality, Service and Safety Administration project has signified a major step in this direction enhancing the measuring and monitoring the quality of care.

Purpose: The objective of the proposed study is to take a further step in this direction by developing, implementing and monitoring a routine systematic evaluation of clinical process and outcome indicators, patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) to study the quality and continuity of care over time.

Hypotheses: We hypothesize that 1) adherence to indicators will be associated with better PREMs, PROMs and clinician ratings 2) PROMs and clinician ratings will be positively related and 3) PREMs and PROMs will be positively related.

Method: 125 patients (ages 18-55) admitted to SHALVATA mental health center and their clinicians will be recruited to participate in a prospective longitudinal assessment. Each will include PREMs, PROMs clinician rated outcomes and assessment of the degree to which clinical indicators (reflected processes of clinical guidelines) were carried out. The assessments will take place at admission, discharge and every 3 months for up for 9 months. The design is a repeated measures design with evaluating the interaction effect between assessed levels of indicators ("between subject effect") and level of change in the PREMs, PROMs clinician along the research trajectory ("within subject effect").

Importance of the study: The mental health reform, implemented cross-nationally since 2015 emphasizes client centred and continuity of care and seeks to increase the quality, availability and accessibility of mental health services in Israel. Most of the discussion to date has been on the later issues of access and availability and much less on quality and continuity of care which requires standardized routine longitudinal assessment of process indicators and patients reported experience and outcome. The proposed study represents a pioneer effort to collect systematic data which can help evaluate the quality and impact of services over time. Findings can be useful to guide policy about the feasibility and impact of process indicators and their relation to PROMs and PREMs over time.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

125

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hod Hasharon, Israel
        • Shalvata Mental health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

125 patients (ages 18-55) suffering from SMI (Severe Mental Ilness) admitted to SHALVATA mental health center and their clinicians will be recruited to participate in a prospective longitudinal assessment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted to hospitalization in each of the participating departments
  • suffer from SMI (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder of any kind, major effective disorder, anxiety disorders in need of hospitalization, severe personality disorder required for hospitalization)
  • Speaking and reading and writing in fluent Hebrew
  • Sign a trial consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

- unable to understand the content of the questionnaires, or their mental state does not allow them to answer the questionnaires as required

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Study group
Group of all patients hospitalized in the SMHC and due participate in rehabilitative procedures
125 patients (ages 18-55) admitted to SHALVATA mental health center and their clinicians will be recruited to participate in a prospective longitudinal assessment. Each will include PREMs, PROMs clinician rated outcomes and assessment of the degree to which clinical indicators (reflected processes of clinical guidelines) were carried out. The assessments will take place at admission, discharge and every 3 months for up for 9 months. The design is a repeated measures design with evaluating the interaction effect between assessed levels of indicators ("between subject effect") and level of change in the PREMs, PROMs clinician along the research trajectory ("within subject effect").

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GAF
Time Frame: 0,3, 6 and 9 months after enrollment
The Global Assessment of Functioning, or GAF, scale is used to rate how serious a mental illness may be. It measures how much a person's symptoms affect his or her day-to-day life on a scale of 0 to 100. An improvement will be regarded if the GAF will increase in 10% from start point (time=0 months) to end point (time=9 months). Assessments will be made also on 3 and 6 months in order to examine graduality in improvement.
0,3, 6 and 9 months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0001-20-SHA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Monitoring PROM @ PREM data on participating patients

3
Subscribe