Success Rate of Ultrasound Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injection in Sacroiliitis

June 16, 2020 updated by: Karim Alaaeldin Tawfik

The Success Rate of Ultrasound Guided Sacroiliac Joint Steroid Injections in Sacroiliitis: Are we Getting Better

To re-investigate the success rate of Ultrasound guided sacroiliac joint steroid injection in depositing the drug inside the joint capsule (confirmed by contrast spread in fluoroscopy) and if there is a difference in clinical outcome between injections done strictly inside the joint and injections done periarticular.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

An IV cannula will be inserted, and basic ASA monitors applied, then the patients will be positioned in prone position. After disinfection of the skin, Ultra sonography will be used to Guide Needle Placement in SIJ (the hypoechoic cleft between the surface of the sacrum and the ilium) under complete a sepsis as the technique previously described in the literature.

A low frequency (2-5 Hz) curvilinear transducer will be used in a sterile cover, the posterior superior iliac spine, lateral borderof sacrum, and ilium will be identified in transverse orientation. Subsequently, the probe will be moved caudally until the superior part of the posterior SIJ is identified. The SIJ will be traced caudally until the distal third of the SIJ is visualized as evident by the flat contour of the iliac crest and the presence of the second sacral foramen on the medial aspect of the sacrum.

After local anesthetic infiltration of skin and subcutaneous tissues using Lidocaine 1%, a 21-gauge spinal needle will be advanced from a medial to lateral direction using an in-plane technique. After reaching the joint, a total volume of 4 ml of injectate will be injected which consists of: 1 ml 40 mg of methylprednisoloneacetate (Depo-Medrol®, Pfizer), 2 ml Lidocaine 2%, 1 ml Iohexol (Omnipaque 300®, GE Healthcare).

Control fluoroscopy

After injection of the drug and withdrawal of the needle, a antero-posterior fluoroscopy image will be obtained and recorded for the injected joint to detect the spread pattern of the contrast and whether its pre-dominantly intra or periarticular. (N.B: Periarticular injection is any injection done near the joint as evidenced by US but on fluoroscopy no contrast is detected inside the joint). Then a sterile patch will be applied to the puncture site and patient discharged to the recovery room for follow-up for 30 minutes before discharge to home.

Measurement tools

  • Total number of intraarticular and periarticular drug injections as evidenced by contrast spread in fluoroscopy.
  • Patient's pain score rated from 0-10 (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, NRS) before the procedure, 10 minutes after the procedure (in the recovery room), 1 week and 1 month post-procedure.
  • Demographic data (including age, sex, BMI, ASA score).
  • Limitation of physical functioning as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 month after the procedure .
  • Procedure-related variables (time, complications, patient satisfaction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11562
        • Faculty of medicine Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has sacroiliitis (acute or chronic) by history.
  • Failed conservative therapy eg. bed rest, anti-inflammatory medications and physical therapy for at least 6 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has BMI above 35 kg/m2
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Renal or Hepatic Failure.
  • Current Pregnancy or actively pursuing pregnancy.
  • Known allergy to local anesthetic or steroids.
  • Infection at site of needle placement or SIJ infection.
  • Prior surgical procedures involving the SIJ.
  • Previous surgical Fixation involving the lumbar spine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultrasound , fluroscope
After injection of corticosteroids with 1 ml contrast in sacroiliac joint using ultrasound and withdrawal of the needle, an antero-posterior fluoroscopy image will be obtained and recorded for the injected joint to detect the spread pattern of the contrast and whether its pre-dominantly intra or periarticular.
success rate of Ultrasound guided SIJ steroid injection confirmed by contrast spread in fluoroscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success rate of ultrasound sacroiliac joint injection
Time Frame: Immediately after injection
Percent of successful intraarticular drug injections during USG SIJ steroid injection (as confirmed by contrast spread in fluoroscopy)
Immediately after injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in clinical outcome between intraarticular and periarticular injections.
Time Frame: After 10 minutes, 1 week and 1 month
Difference in clinical outcome between intraarticular and periarticular injections (confirmed via fluroscopy) as measured clinically by numerical pain score (NPS is a scale from 0 to 10. 0 is no pain and 10 is the maximum pain)
After 10 minutes, 1 week and 1 month
Clinical improvement
Time Frame: After 10 minutes, 1 week ,1 month
Pain score at 10 minutes , 1 week and 1 month after intervention by numerical pain score (NPS is a scale from 0 to 10. 0 is no pain and 10 is the maximum pain)
After 10 minutes, 1 week ,1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amany E Ayad, M.D, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Ahmed Z Fouad, M.D, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Mohamed A Mansour, M.D, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Karim A Tawfik, MSc, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N-161-2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sacroiliitis

Clinical Trials on Ultrasonography, fluoroscopy

Subscribe