Dosage of Epidural Morphine in Elderly Patients

February 27, 2025 updated by: Muhammad Mostafa Shawqi Abdelnasser, Assiut University

Epidural Morphine for Geriatrics Undergoing Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery: a Dose Response Study

This a clinical trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of three different doses of morphine, namely 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg, via the epidural route regarding reducing pain in elderly patients after a cancer surgery in the lower abdomen

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute postoperative pain is a common complaint for several days after surgery. However, acute postoperative pain remains even more under controlled in elderly patients, especially those with cognitive impairment and malignancy. Geriatric population is reported to be at higher risk for unwanted side effects from analgesic treatments compared to younger patients due to different major risk factors such as: decline in organ function, polypharmacy, pharmacokinetics, drug sensitivity, and frailty. Despite of the higher risk of opioids, especially morphine, causing toxicity and adverse effect; they are still the cornerstone treatment of severe acute postoperative pain. Morphine in those patients is very likely to cause toxicity because of accumulation of its active metabolites compared to other opioids with fewer or no active metabolites. Epidural morphine is an effective route for an effective drug. Furthermore, unwanted side effects with neuraxial opioids are minor and managed easily. Regarding clinical outcomes, clinical studies showed a lot of improvements associated with postoperative opioid analgesia. Now, there is a clinical necessity to achieve the best management of acute postoperative pain in elderly patients with the least possibility of adverse side effects. We aim in this randomized, assessor blinded, clinical trial at Assuit University to determine the optimum dose of epidural morphine for the highest control of acute postoperative pain in geriatrics who are planned to have lower abdominal cancer surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assuit, Egypt, 71515
        • Assuit university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Men and women aged ≥ 60 years, who are planned to undergo lower abdominal cancer surgery.

2- ASA I and II classifications. 2. Surgeries via infra-umbilical abdominal incision is considered eligible.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal.
  2. Patients who are morbidly obese (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2).
  3. Those with contraindications to neuraxial analgesia. 4- psychiatric illness that would interfere with the perception and the assessment of pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group D
A total volume of 10 mL injection 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist.
Normal saline will be given epidurally.
Other Names:
  • D
Active Comparator: Group A
A total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 1.5 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist.
1.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.
Other Names:
  • A
Active Comparator: Group B
A total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 3 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist.
3 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.
Other Names:
  • B
Active Comparator: Group C
A total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 4 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist.
4.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.
Other Names:
  • C

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.
Time Frame: 72 hours
The mean total PCA morphine consumption (mg) in the first 72 hr. postoperatively
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 72 hours
Visual Analog Scale is a visual chart scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 ( the worst pain ever) used by the patient to report the severity of their pain to assess the pain intensity, and all patients were instructed how to evaluate their pain and how to use the patient-controlled analgesia.
72 hours
Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale
Time Frame: Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale at 2 hours postoperative

It is an six-point scale informed by degree of responsiveness to verbal and tactile stimulus where awake levels were as follows:

I = anxious, agitated, or restless; II = cooperative, oriented, and tranquil; III = response to command, and asleep levels were dependent on the patient's response to a light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; IV = brisk response; V = a sluggish response; and VI = no response

Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale at 2 hours postoperative
Nausea Score
Time Frame: 72 hours

It is a subjective scale to assess the nauseating side effects of morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Nausea scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where:

0 was recorded if the side effect was absent;

  1. if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment;
  2. if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.
72 hours
Vomiting Score
Time Frame: 72 hours

It is a subjective scale to assess the vomiting as a side effect of epidural morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Vomiting scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where:

0 was recorded if the side effect was absent;

  1. if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment;
  2. if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.
72 hours
Pruritus Score
Time Frame: 72 hours

It is a subjective scale to assess the pruritus as a side effect of morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Pruritus scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where:

0 was recorded if the side effect was absent;

  1. if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment;
  2. if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Diab Hetta, MD, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data will not be publicly available due to containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will not be publicly available due to containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will not be publicly available due to containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Normal saline

Subscribe