A Safety Evaluation Trial of TEV-48125 Self-administered in Migraine Patients

October 26, 2021 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

A Multicenter, Open-label Trial to Evaluate the Safety of TEV-48125 When Subcutaneously Self-administered in Migraine Patients at the Trial Site and at Home

This trial assesses the safety of TEV-48125 when subcutaneously self-administered in Japanese migraine patients using an autoinjector (AI) at home. Each subject will subcutaneously self-administer TEV 48125 at 225 mg/1.5 mL (150 mg/mL) once monthly for a total of 2 doses. The first dose will be self-administered at the trial site under the supervision of the investigator and the second dose will be self-administered at home.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sendai, Japan
        • Sendai Zutsu No-Shinkei Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a history of migraine (according to the ICHD-3 criteria) diagnosis for ≥12 months prior to giving informed consent.
  • Patient fulfills any of the migraine criteria(according to the ICHD-3 criteria) on ≥4 days in baseline information collected during the 28-day screening period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of hypersensitivity reactions to injected proteins, including monoclonal antibodies
  • Prior exposure to a monoclonal antibody targeting (CGRP) pathway meeting the following conditions:

    • Less than 5 months has passed since the final administration of AMG334, ALD304, or LY2951742.
    • Less than 1 year has passed since the final administration of TEV-48125

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment: TEV-48125
Each subject will subcutaneously self-administer TEV 48125 at 225 mg/1.5 mL (150 mg/mL) once monthly for a total of 2 doses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Time Frame: [1] Baseline (Day 1) to Day 28, [2] Visit 3 (Day 29) up to end of treatment (Day 57)
  • TEAEs were defined as AEs that started after the start of investigational medicinal product (IMP) treatment; or if the event was continuous from baseline and was worsening after the start of IMP treatment.
  • The number of subjects with TEAEs were provided by self-administration at the trial site and by self-administration at home.

    1. For TEAEs following self-administration at the trial site, TEAEs that occurred after self-administration at the trial site (Baseline) but before self-administration at home (Visit 3) were tabulated.
    2. For TEAEs following self-administration at home, TEAEs that occurred after self-administration at home but before the end of the trial were tabulated.
[1] Baseline (Day 1) to Day 28, [2] Visit 3 (Day 29) up to end of treatment (Day 57)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Execution Status of Self-administration - Amount of Drug Solution Remaining in the AI
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Visit 3 (Day 29)

Following self-administration at the trial site and at home, the AI was checked to see whether or not all of the drug solution had been injected and the appropriate description of the amount of drug solution remaining in the AI was recorded based on th following 5-point scale (0 to 4) measure.

  • 0: All drug solution has been injected
  • 1: Approximately 1/4 of the drug solution remaining
  • 2: Approximately 1/2 of the drug solution remaining
  • 3: Approximately 3/4 of the drug solution remaining
  • 4: Almost all of the drug solution remaining
Baseline (Day 1) and Visit 3 (Day 29)
Execution Status of Self-administration - Leakage of Drug Solution on the Skin
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Visit 3 (Day 29)

Following self-administration at the trial site and at home, the injection site was observed for any leakage of drug solution on the skin was recorded based on the following 5-point scale (0 to 4) measure. Criteria 0, 1, and 2 on the 5-point scale measure were deemed to represent a successful self-injection.

  • 0: No sign of drug solution on the skin
  • 1: Slight wetness on the skin (mist)
  • 2: Approx. 1/5 (0.3 mL) of the drug solution observed on the skin (most of the drug solution subcutaneously administered)
  • 3: Approx. 1/2 (0.75 mL) of the drug solution observed on the skin (ie, approx. 1/2 of drug solution subcutaneously administered)
  • 4: Almost all of the drug solution observed on the skin (ie, little or no drug solution subcutaneously administered)
Baseline (Day 1) and Visit 3 (Day 29)
Subject Compliance With the Self-administration Procedure
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Visit 3 (Day 29)

Subject compliance with the self-administration procedure was evaluated based on information recorded on a checklist.

Compliance with each of the procedures during IMP preparation, injection administration, and after injection was verified by checking the "Yes" or "No" responses marked for each item on the checklist. Based on this checklist, the investigator judged adherence to self-administration procedure.

Baseline (Day 1) and Visit 3 (Day 29)
Number of Deficiencies With the AI Device
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Visit 3 (Day 29)
A deficiency with the AI device (AI device deficiency) is defined as any defect in the quality, safety, or performance of the device, such as mechanical breakage and malfunction, no matter whether it is caused by design, manufacture, dispensing, storage,or use.
Baseline (Day 1) and Visit 3 (Day 29)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results of this study will be shared with researchers to achieve aims pre-specified in a methodologically sound research proposal.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after marketing approval in global markets, or beginning 1-3 years following article Publication. There is no end date to the availability of the data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Otsuka will share data on an Otsuka-owned remotely accessible data sharing platform with Python and R analytical software. Research requests should be directed to clinicaltransparency@Otsuka-us.com.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Migraine

3
Subscribe