Freestyle-Perimount Calcification Comparison

July 23, 2024 updated by: Matteo Pettinari, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

In Vivo Calcium Score Measurement After Freestyle Full Root Replacement in Young Adults

The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate and anatomy of the aortic wall and leaflet calcification of the FS prosthesis implanted as full root in patients younger than 60 years compared to a stented bioprostheses (Perimount Magna Ease, PM). A 3D CT scan will be used to assess the calcification score and to determine the relationship between calcification and aortic valve leaflet.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A recent update of the American Hear Association and American College of Cardiology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease1 recommended that for patients between 50 and 70 years of age, it is reasonable to the choice of either a mechanical or bioprosthetic valve; the threshold for biological valves continues to decrease and more younger adults will receive this kind of prosthesis. However the best biological option for these patients is still a matter of debate. Stented bio-prosthesis is the most common choice. However, the predicted 15-year risk of needing reoperation because of structural deterioration is 22% for patients 50 years of age2.

In the late 80's stentless valve as the Medtronic Freestyle (FS) has been introduced with the hope that it may provide physiological flow in the aortic root, sinuses, and coronary orifices and a low risk of thromboembolism. Several randomized study and meta-analysis demonstrated improved hemodynamic, a larger orifice area and a midterm survival advantage of stentless aortic valve compared to stented aortic valve replacement3, 4. The FS valve is believed to provide greater durability and superior hemodynamic performance due to the low mechanical stress on the leaflet tissues. The failure mode of the FS is thought to be mostly calcification of the aorta wall and cusp tears because collagen degradation5. This phenomenon is inflammation mediated process.

Aim of this study is to evaluate the rate and anatomy of the aortic wall and leaflet calcification of the FS prosthesis implanted as full root in patients younger than 60 years compared to a stented bioprostheses (Perimount Magna Ease, PM). A 3D CT scan will be used to assess the calcification score and to determine the relationship between calcification and aortic valve leaflet.

Between 2007 and 2017, among patients younger than 60 years of age, 51 patients underwent a full root replacement with a FS and 49 received a Perimount Magna Ease prosthesis. Those patients will undergo a 3D CT scan. The group of the patient with PM will be matched in function of age and interval of follow-up with the FS group.

A transthoracic echocardiogram will be performed to check residual valve insufficiency and trans-valvular gradients. A cardiopulmonary exercise test ( with extraction of maximal oxygen consumption ) combined with a trans thoracic echocardiography (stress echocardiography) will be performed to evaluate the patients exercise capacity and its influence on the cardiac and valve function.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Genk, Limburg, Belgium, 3600
        • Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients operated for aortic valve stenosis at least three years earlier undergoing a valve replacement with Freestyle (FS) or Perimount (PM) bioprosthesis under the age of 60 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  • Patients treated with FS or PM
  • Age less than 60 at the moment of the implant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Kidney failure or contrast allergy
  • Previous endocarditis and aortic dissection
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Freestyle group
Patients treated with a Freestyle aortic valve bioprosthesis
Multislice CT scanning for aortic wall calcification
Transthoracic stress echocardiography
Perimount group
Patients treated with a Perimount aortic valve bioprosthesis
Multislice CT scanning for aortic wall calcification
Transthoracic stress echocardiography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantification of aortic leaflet Calcium-score in FS and PM valve
Time Frame: 3 years
The Agatston score. The score is calculated using a weighted value assigned to the highest density of calcification in a given coronary artery. The density is measured in Hounsfield units (HU), and score of 1 for 130-199 HU, 2 for 200-299 HU, 3 for 300-399 HU, and 4 for 400 HU and greater. The higher the score the more the calcification.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Echocardiographic function of the aortic valve at rest and during exercise: transvalvular mean and peak gradient
Time Frame: 3 years
Aortic valve mean and peak gradient: mmHg
3 years
Echocardiographic function of the aortic valve at rest and during exercise: Valve regurgitation
Time Frame: 3 years
Aortic valve regurgitation: vena contracta (mm)
3 years
Exercise capacity: New York Heart Association class
Time Frame: 3 years
New York Heart Association class from 1 to 4 with 1=no dyspnea during exercise till 4= dyspnea in rest;
3 years
Exercise capacity: maximum oxygen consumption
Time Frame: 3 years
max oxygen consumption measured in ml/kg*min
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matteo Pettinari, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ctu2020003

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Disease

Clinical Trials on Multislice CT scanning for aortic wall calcification

Subscribe