Adherence to the iFightDepression Online Self-help Tool for Mild and Moderate Depression

April 24, 2020 updated by: Anna Varga, Semmelweis University

Background Computerized cognitive behavioural therapy (cCBT) is proven to be an effective self-help tool for preventing depression and suicide. Patient adherence is one of the components that the effectiveness of cCBT self-help tools are dependent on and that needs to be researched for understanding and maximizing the effectiveness of computer-based interventions for depression and suicide.

Aims The aims of this study were to compare the adherence of iFightDepression (iFD) online tool user patients with and without an extra weekly phone call consultation and to test predictors of adherence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Depressive disorders are recognized as one of the most widespread lifetime disorders and unipolar depression is identified as a leading cause of disease burden . These findings legitimate the importance of reducing depressive symptoms by implementing cost-effective interventions. Despite the fact that cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is proved to be an efficient treatment for depression, mental health care resources are scarce and cannot fulfil the huge amount of need for face-to-face psychotherapeutic treatments. The aim of increasingly deploying computerized cognitive behavioural therapy (cCBT) is to improve access to psychological treatments, reduce waiting lists, speed up clinical recovery and to bridge the paucity of specialists in small towns. Moreover, guided web-based self-help interventions are proved to be cost-effective and time-saving for mental health care systems as well. Numerous studies have proved the cCBT to be effective in case of depression, however drop-out rates of online self-help interventions are usually high - between 5 and 38.7%. Systematic reviews showed that in web-based self-help treatments extra support obtains higher adherence than no guidance. Treatment-adherence, defined as the amount of a therapeutic intervention that an individual engages with or completes, has clear clinical implications: poor adherence limits the exposure to the full program and increases the required 'dosage' of treatment.

In the comparison of drop-out rates of different psychological treatments, no difference has been found between face-to-face and web-based interventions. Previous research has found that the drop-out risk from cCBT is significantly correlated with gender, educational level and age. Increased drop-out risk included male gender, younger age and lower educational level. This finding has been proved in another research as well, where females have been found to provide more effort to cope with depression compared to males.

With regard to adherence, a low educational level might negatively influence the adherence to cCBT as understanding the content of intervention can be troublesome. Results from previous studies suggested that younger individuals had higher adherence to web-based treatment, whilst some other studies showed that younger age was related to low treatment adherence. Several findings also suggested that additional forms of guidance or support via phone or email increase the level of adherence. In order to offer web-based treatment to patients with the most benefits, it would be useful to identify the predictors of treatment adherence and causes of the relatively high dropout rate.

Insomnia is one of the main symptoms of depression. Studies show insomnia to be one of the risk factors such for development of depression as for reducing response to depression treatment and increasing relapse of depression. Therefore, to quest a correlation between adherence in an online self-help program for depression and sleep disturbances would be subservient.

Our goal in this study was to identify predictors of adherence to a computerized CBT program and to investigate whether sociodemographic variables, hopelessness and sleep disturbances are connected to adherence. Another objective was to compare adherence in web-based self-help intervention with and without weekly follow-up phone-calls as extra support. Our hypothesis was that phone-support would increase adherence level of cCBT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

73

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Budapest, Hungary, 1089
        • Semmelweis University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 82 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mild symptoms of depression

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute psychotic episodes
  • acute suicidal behavior
  • acute substance abuse
  • bipolar disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TAU
TAU
Experimental: iFD
Computerized cognitive behavior therapy
Experimental: iFD + weekly phone calls
Computerized cognitive behavior therapy
phone call

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sociodemographic data
Time Frame: 6 weeks
gender, age, education and place of living
6 weeks
Depression
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Measured by Beck Depression Inventory; a) no depression; b) mild depression; c) moderate depression; d) severe depression
6 weeks
Hopelessness
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Measured by Shortened Beck Hopelessness Scale; possible responses: no (0), yes (1)
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Treatment as Usual

Subscribe