Urinary and Sexual Dysfunctions Evaluation After Rectal Resection (EURECA)

Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of Urinary and Sexual Dysfunctions After Rectal Cancer Resection

Advances in the treatment of rectal cancer over the past two decades have improved survival and significantly reduced surgery-related morbidity. As a result, post-treatment quality of life (QoL) issues have become increasingly important. Urinary and sexual functions can be significantly altered after rectal resection, mainly due to the iatrogenic lesions of the pelvic autonomous lexus. Of note, their incidence is reported up to 70% and 30%, respectively. Despite the importance of this topic, most of the studies present in the literature are difficult to interpret for a variety of reasons. Firstly, both sexual and urinary dysfunctions lack a standardized definition. Secondly, the absence of baseline data, missing data, small sample sizes, and heterogeneity in the use of validated and nonvalidated instruments are the main limitation in drawing conclusive results. As additional factor, no clear evidence is present in the literature regarding the best approach to be used in order to preserve as much as possible both the sexual and urinary functionalities and to guarantee, at the same time, an adequate and oncologically correct rectal resection. Moreover, no data are currently present regarding the impact of pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy on the urinary and sexual functionalities. The main objective of the investigator's prospective study will be to define in a subjective manner which technique (open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted and Ta-TME) will guarantee the best urinary and sexual outcomes after rectal resection (with or without pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy) for the treatment of rectal carcinomas.

Thus, the primary endpoint will the post-operative evaluation at 1, 6 months and 1 year of the urinary and sexual functions by means of specific questionnaires.

Secondary endpoints will be:

  • to investigate which technique (open, robotic, laparoscopic and trans-anal total mesorectal excision (TaTME)) more favorably correlate with urinary and sexual functions after radiochemotherapy (NAD+);
  • the comparison of both the urinary and sexual dysfunction incidence on the base of the distance of the rectal tumor from the anal verge and the evaluation of the best approach to be used (open, laparoscopic, TaTME or robot-assisted) in relation to the tumor height;
  • the short- (postoperative morbidity and histopathological data) and long-term (overall and disease-free survival) outcomes comparison among the open, laparoscopic, TaTME and robotic rectal resection.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1172

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Lazio
      • Roma, Lazio, Italy, 00168
        • Recruiting
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS di Roma
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with a diagnosis of rectal cancer referred to one of the centers involved in the study during the study period

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with a histopathological proven diagnosis of rectal carcinoma undergoing curative surgical resection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged < 18 years
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Emergent surgeries
  • Previous prostatic and/or colorectal surgery for benign or malignant diseases
  • Preoperative sexual disorders (Female Sexual Function Index, FSFI ≤ 26.55 ; International Index Erectile Function , IIEF < 16)
  • International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire > 5
  • Clinically evident Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) (International Prostatic Symptoms Score, IPSS > 20)
  • Preoperative diagnosis of fecal and/or urinary incontinence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Open rectal resection
Comparison among the 4 different surgical approaches for urinary and sexual function
Laparoscopic rectal resection
Comparison among the 4 different surgical approaches for urinary and sexual function
Robotic rectal resection
Comparison among the 4 different surgical approaches for urinary and sexual function
Trans-anal TME (Ta-TME)
Comparison among the 4 different surgical approaches for urinary and sexual function

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urinary and sexual outcomes after rectal resection
Time Frame: At 1 month after surgery
Which technique (open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted and Ta-TME) will guarantee the best urinary and sexual outcomes after rectal resection (with or without pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy) for the treatment of rectal carcinomas
At 1 month after surgery
Urinary and sexual outcomes after rectal resection
Time Frame: At 6 months after surgery
Which technique (open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted and Ta-TME) will guarantee the best urinary and sexual outcomes after rectal resection (with or without pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy) for the treatment of rectal carcinomas
At 6 months after surgery
Urinary and sexual outcomes after rectal resection
Time Frame: At 12 months after surgery
Which technique (open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted and Ta-TME) will guarantee the best urinary and sexual outcomes after rectal resection (with or without pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy) for the treatment of rectal carcinomas
At 12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 21, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 20, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Evaluation of urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectal resection

3
Subscribe