Comparing Two Doses of IV Esomeprazole After Successful Endoscopic Therapy (lowdosePPI)

May 27, 2020 updated by: Changhua Christian Hospital

A Double Blind Study Comparing Low Dose and High Dose IV Esomeprazole After Successful Endoscopic Therapy in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

The investigators used two different doses of esomeprazole (40 mg IV q.d. and 40 mg IV q6h for three days followed by esomeprazole 40 mg q.d. orally in two groups) after successful endoscopic therapy with heat probe therapy or hemoclip placement.

The goal of this study is to assess the outcomes of two different regimens of low vs. high dose of intravenous esomeprazole after endoscopic therapy in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A bleeding peptic ulcer remains a serious medical problem with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic therapy significantly reduces further bleeding, surgery, and mortality in patients receiving intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI)and is now recommended as the first hemostatic modality for these patients. In the past few years, adjuvant use of a high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) after endoscopic therapy has been endorsed in some studies, including two consensus statements and two meta-analysis. To sustain a high intragastric pH, a high dose of omeprazole has been used in previous studies concerning high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding. However, in one recent published metaanalysis found that low dose PPI may be as effective as high dose PPI in preventing further bleeding in high-risk patients. Therefore, one double blind study is needed clarify this puzzle.

We used two different doses of esomeprazole (40 mg IV q.d. and 40 mg IV q6h for three days followed by esomeprazole 40 mg q.d. orally in two groups) after successful endoscopic therapy with heat probe therapy or hemoclip placement.

The goal of this study is to assess the outcomes of two different regimens of low vs. high dose of intravenous esomeprazole after endoscopic therapy in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 110
        • Division of Gastroenterology, TMUH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with peptic ulcer bleeding with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible (initial Hb<10, shock, or coffee grounds or blood in stomach)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age >90y/o
  • pregnant woman
  • allergic to esomeprazole
  • unwilling to enter this study
  • bleeding tendency
  • severe co-morbid illness, including cancer, hepatic failure, renal failure,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: low dose PPI
40 mg esomeprazole IV for three days followed by esomeprazole 40 mg po daily for two months
for hemostasis
Other Names:
  • Olympus co.
Active Comparator: high dose PPI
40 mg esomeprazole IV every 6 hr for 3 days followed by 40 mg po daily for two months
for hemostasis
Other Names:
  • Olympus co.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
further bleeding
Time Frame: 14 days
Number of participants with rebleeding within 14 days
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days
hospital stay in day
30 days
need of blood transfusion
Time Frame: 30 days
number of participants need of blood transufion
30 days
surgical intervention
Time Frame: 30 days
number of participants need surgical intervention to manage bleeding
30 days
mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
number of participants death
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hwai-jeng Lin, M.D., Taipei Medical University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

Clinical Trials on heat probe or hemoclip

3
Subscribe