- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04409600
Comparison of Non-Surgical Treatment Options for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS)
February 13, 2026 updated by: Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS) in the lower leg is a debilitating condition in highly active individuals.
Pain occurs in 1 or several leg compartments upon an exertional activity, typically running, that quickly dissipates once the activity stopped.
Surgical fasciotomy is the standard for treating lower leg CECS, but success is variable.
Complications may occur post-surgery and there is a potential for a repeat procedure.
Recovery times post-surgery also vary greatly.
Conservative treatments, such as gait retraining and botulinum toxin injections, are emerging as non-surgical options for the treatment of CECS with success through published case reports and case series.
This study aims to evaluate the use of these non-surgical treatment options for CECS in the anterior and lateral leg compartments with a follow up for at least 2 years across multiple study sites.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
35
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20307
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
-
-
North Carolina
-
Fort Bragg, North Carolina, United States, 28310
- Womack Army Medical Center
-
-
Texas
-
Killeen, Texas, United States, 76544
- Carl R. Darnell Army Medical Center
-
-
Virginia
-
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, United States, 22060
- Fort Belvoir Community Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 50 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Active duty service
- Fluent in speaking and reading English
- Unable to run 2 miles without producing pain and/or symptoms
- Difficulty completing the running portion of their service-specific physical training due to pain and/or symptoms in their lower leg
- Meets clinical diagnostic criteria for CECS of the anterior or lateral compartment per clinical examination (palpation, intramuscular compartment pressure, lower leg MRI).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior botulinum injection in the lower leg compartment of the affected limb
- Prior compartment release of affected lower leg
- Recent (within the last 6 months) lower limb injury that needed medical intervention
- Completed formal gait retraining within the last 6 months
- Allergic to botulinum toxin
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Medical examination that indicates a condition other than CECS
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Home Based Gait Retraining + Saline Injection
|
The participants allocated to this group will have 1 session in the clinic with a trained medical professional and be given a gait retraining program to complete at home.
The participant will receive a saline injection to their painful lower leg compartment(s).
|
|
Experimental: Home Based Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection
|
The participants allocated to this group will have 1 session in the clinic with a trained medical professional and be given a gait retraining program to complete at home.
The participant will receive a botulinum toxin injection to their painful lower leg compartment(s).
|
|
Active Comparator: Supervised Gait Retraining + Saline Injection
|
The participant will receive a saline injection to their painful lower leg compartment(s).
The participants allocated to this group will attend 8 sessions during the course of 6 weeks in the clinic with a trained medical professional to complete a supervised gait retraining program.
|
|
Experimental: Supervised Gait Retraining + Botulinum Toxin Injection
|
The participant will receive a botulinum toxin injection to their painful lower leg compartment(s).
The participants allocated to this group will attend 8 sessions during the course of 6 weeks in the clinic with a trained medical professional to complete a supervised gait retraining program.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability.
9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively.
The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicates better running ability.
|
baseline
|
|
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at 8 Weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-week
|
The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability.
9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively.
The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicates better running ability.
|
8-week
|
|
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at 3-months Post-injection
Time Frame: 3-month
|
The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability.
9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively.
The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicates better running ability.
|
3-month
|
|
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score 6-months Post-injection
Time Frame: 6-month
|
The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability.
9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively.
The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicate better running ability.
|
6-month
|
|
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-month
|
The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability.
9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively.
The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicate better running ability.
|
12-month
|
|
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at 24-Months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 24-month
|
The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability.
9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively.
The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicate better running ability.
|
24-month
|
|
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Score at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100.
A higher score suggests a higher level of function.
|
baseline
|
|
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) 8-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-weeks
|
A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100.
A higher score suggests a higher level of function.
|
8-weeks
|
|
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) at 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100.
A higher score suggests a higher level of function.
|
3-months
|
|
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100.
A higher score suggests a higher level of function.
|
6-months
|
|
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) at 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100.
A higher score suggests a higher level of function.
|
12-months
|
|
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) at 24-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 24-months
|
A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100.
A higher score suggests a higher level of function.
|
24-months
|
|
Global Rate of Change Score at 8-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-weeks
|
Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline.
Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline).
The participant chooses one number on the scale.
Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.
|
8-weeks
|
|
Global Rate of Change Score 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline.
Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline).
The participant chooses one number on the scale.
Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.
|
3-months
|
|
Global Rate of Change Score at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline.
Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline).
The participant chooses one number on the scale.
Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.
|
6-months
|
|
Global Rate of Change Score 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline.
Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline).
The participant chooses one number on the scale.
Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.
|
12-months
|
|
Global Rate of Change Score at 24-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 24-months
|
Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline.
Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline).
The participant chooses one number on the scale.
Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.
|
24-months
|
|
Duty Status at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.
|
baseline
|
|
Duty Status at 8-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-weeks
|
Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.
|
8-weeks
|
|
Duty Status at 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.
|
3-months
|
|
Duty Status at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.
|
6-months
|
|
Duty Status at 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.
|
12-months
|
|
Duty Status at 24-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 24-months
|
Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.
|
24-months
|
|
Patient Specific Functional Scale Scores at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition.
The reported values represent an average across all activities.
|
baseline
|
|
Patient Specific Functional Scale Scores at 8-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-weeks
|
Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition.
The reported values represent an average across all activities.
|
8-weeks
|
|
Patient Specific Functional Scale Scores at 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition.
The reported values represent an average across all activities.
|
3-months
|
|
Patient Specific Functional Scale Scores at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition.
The reported values represent an average across all activities.
|
6-months
|
|
Patient Specific Functional Scale Scores at 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition.
The reported values represent an average across all activities.
|
12-months
|
|
Patient Specific Functional Scale Scores at 24-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 24-months
|
Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition.
The reported values represent an average across all activities.
|
24-months
|
|
Balance Error Scoring System Score at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition.
Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.
|
baseline
|
|
Balance Error Scoring System Score at 8-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-weeks
|
The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition.
Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.
|
8-weeks
|
|
Balance Error Scoring System Score at 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition.
Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.
|
3-months
|
|
Balance Error Scoring System Score at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition.
Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.
|
6-months
|
|
Balance Error Scoring System Score at 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition.
Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.
|
12-months
|
|
Gait Analysis - Cadence at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected.
Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds.
The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.
|
Baseline
|
|
Ability to Run 2 Miles at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.
|
baseline
|
|
Ability to Run 2 Miles at 8-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-weeks
|
Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.
|
8-weeks
|
|
Ability to Run 2 Miles at 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.
|
3-months
|
|
Ability to Run 2 Miles at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.
|
6-months
|
|
Ability to Run 2 Miles at 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.
|
12-months
|
|
Ability to Run 2 Miles at 24-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 24-months
|
Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.
|
24-months
|
|
Gait Analysis - Cadence at 8-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-Weeks
|
Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected.
Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds.
The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.
|
8-Weeks
|
|
Gait Analysis - Cadence at 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected.
Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds.
The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.
|
3-months
|
|
Gait Analysis - Cadence at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected.
Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds.
The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.
|
6-months
|
|
Gait Analysis - Cadence at 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected.
Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds.
The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.
|
12-months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ability to Perform Service Specific Job Tasks at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.
|
baseline
|
|
Ability to Perform Service Specific Job Tasks at 8-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-weeks
|
Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.
|
8-weeks
|
|
Ability to Perform Service Specific Job Tasks at 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.
|
3-months
|
|
Ability to Perform Service Specific Job Tasks at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.
|
6-months
|
|
Ability to Perform Service Specific Job Tasks at 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.
|
12-months
|
|
Ability to Perform Service Specific Job Tasks at 24-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 24-months
|
Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.
|
24-months
|
|
Pain Running 2 Miles at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run.
Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.
|
baseline
|
|
Pain Running 2 Miles at 8-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-weeks
|
Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run.
Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain
|
8-weeks
|
|
Pain Running 2 Miles at 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run.
Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.
|
3-months
|
|
Pain Running 2 Miles at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run.
Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.
|
6-months
|
|
Pain Running 2 Miles at 12-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run.
Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.
|
12-months
|
|
Pain Running 2 Miles at 24-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 24-months
|
Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run.
Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.
|
24-months
|
|
Patient Satisfaction of Treatment at 8-week Post-Injection
Time Frame: 8-weeks
|
Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.
|
8-weeks
|
|
Patient Satisfaction of Treatment at 3-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 3-months
|
Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.
|
3-months
|
|
Patient Satisfaction of Treatment at 6-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 6-months
|
Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.
|
6-months
|
|
Patient Satisfaction of Treatment at 12-weeks Post-Injection
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.
|
12-months
|
|
Patient Satisfaction of Treatment at 24-months Post-Injection
Time Frame: 24-months
|
Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.
|
24-months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Leggit, MD, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 5, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 6, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
December 6, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 26, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
June 1, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 13, 2026
Last Verified
March 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Chronic Disease
- Disease Attributes
- Compartment Syndromes
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
- Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins
- Proteins
- Biological Factors
- Hydrolases
- Enzymes
- Enzymes and Coenzymes
- Inorganic Chemicals
- Chlorine Compounds
- Metalloendopeptidases
- Endopeptidases
- Peptide Hydrolases
- Metalloproteases
- Bacterial Proteins
- Bacterial Toxins
- Toxins, Biological
- Sodium Compounds
- Chlorides
- Hydrochloric Acid
- Botulinum Toxins
- Sodium Chloride
Other Study ID Numbers
- WRNMMC-2019-0266
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
-
Emory UniversityIpsenCompletedCompartment Syndrome of LegUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonTerminatedCompartment Syndrome of LegUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonTerminatedCompartment Syndrome of LegUnited States
-
Bispebjerg HospitalRecruitingCompartment Syndrome Nontraumatic Lower LegDenmark
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityRothman Institute Orthopaedics; Lantheus Medical ImagingCompletedChronic Exertional Compartment SyndromeUnited States
-
375th Medical Group, Scott Air Force BaseTerminatedChronic Exertional Compartment SyndromeUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverActive, not recruitingChronic Exertional Compartment SyndromeUnited States
-
University of CalgaryCanadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine (CASEM); Kinesis Medical Centre...RecruitingChronic Exertional Compartment SyndromeCanada
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterDartmouth CollegeCompletedCompartment Syndromes | Compartment Syndrome of Forearm | Compartment Syndrome of Lower LegUnited States
-
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development CommandUnknownAnterior Tibial Compartment SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Home Based Gait Retraining
-
University of Eastern FinlandCompletedOsteoarthritis, Knee | Mobility Limitation | Accidental FallFinland
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese University of Hong Kong; City University of Hong Kong; Bern University...Not yet recruitingKnee OsteoarthritisChina
-
J.J. Amer-CuencaCompletedKinematics | Gait RetrainingSpain
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingOsteoarthritis, KneeUnited States
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompletedKnee OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityCompleted
-
University of South FloridaUnknownEhlers-Danlos Syndrome | Joint Hypermobility | Hyperextension Knees
-
Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical...UnknownPatellofemoral Pain Syndrome | Lower Extremity Problem | Overuse Injury | Shin Splint | Stress Injury, Repetitive
-
Keller Army Community HospitalUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesCompletedPain | Telemedicine | Running | KneeUnited States