Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Fentanyl

June 2, 2020 updated by: Mehdi Nasr Isfahani, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Fentanyl on Pain Management in Isolated Traumatic Patients

Abstract Background: Given the inadequate control of pain in patients with injury that refer to the emergency departments, the rapid onset of action of intranasal administration in pain management, and the avoidance of administering opioid medications, the present study aimed at evaluating the effect of intranasal ketamine versus intranasal fentanyl on pain management in isolated traumatic patients Materials and Methods: The current study was performed on 125 patients that were divided into the following three groups: control group (n = 41), 1 mg/kg intranasal ketamine group (n = 40), and 1μg/kg intranasal fentanyl group (n = 44). Then pain scores, HR, RR, BP, and SaO2 were recorded at baseline, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 40 minutes after the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

125

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with acute limb trauma, aged 15-65 years, with moderate to severe pain (45 mm; visual analog scale (VAS)), with a GCS score of 15, with the systolic blood pressure of lower than 180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure of higher than 90 mmHg
  • lack of pregnancy
  • no history of allergy to ketamine, fentanyl (or opioids), or acetaminophen,
  • no history of liver diseases,
  • no acute or chronic structural or functional nasal obstruction diseases,
  • no history of drug or psychiatric addiction,
  • no pain medication within the past four hours,
  • no history of heart disease,
  • and the presentation of the written consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a decrease in GCS score to less than or equal to 14,
  • an elevated systolic blood pressure to higher than 180 mmHg,
  • a decreased diastolic blood pressure to less than 80 mmHg,
  • inability to understand the VAS pain rating system,
  • symptoms of acute heart disease and respiratory depression (respiratory rate <8 / min),
  • and the patient's dissatisfaction to continue the cooperation in study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control (Placebo+ Standard of Care))
Distilled water
Active Comparator: Ketamine + Standard of Care
1 mg/kg intranasal ketamine
Active Comparator: Fentanyl + Standard of Care
1μg/kg intranasal fentanyl

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue score
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 40 minutes
a scale for measuring the extent of pain relief
Change from baseline at 40 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate (HR)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 40 minutes
Change from baseline at 40 minutes
Blood pressure (BP)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 40 minutes
Change from baseline at 40 minutes
Respiratory rate (RR)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 40 minutes
Change from baseline at 40 minutes
SPO2
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 40 minutes
Blood oxygen saturation
Change from baseline at 40 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

It will be possible to share data if requested

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Acute

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe