mHealth for Self-care of Heart Failure in Uganda

December 5, 2022 updated by: Yale University

An Accessible, Scalable, Patient-facing mHealth Application for Self-care of Heart Failure in LMIC

Heart failure affects more than 38 million people globally. It is responsible for high rates of hospitalization and premature mortality, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Heart failure causes multiple debilitating and distressing symptoms. These symptoms can often be managed by patients themselves but only when they are able to identify symptoms and select appropriate actions. Self-care, a World Health Organization-endorsed intervention for chronic conditions like heart failure, is greatly underutilized in lower and middle income countries, including Uganda. Self-care refers to the ability of patients, caregivers and communities to maintain health, prevent disease, and manage illness, with or without a healthcare provider. Mobile health (mHealth) offers a promising platform to address this need gap in lower and middle income countries. mHealth takes advantage of the widespread usage of mobile phones to offer patients individualized self-care tools such as education, healthy lifestyle prompts, and support with making decisions. Since 2016, this multidisciplinary, international research team has been designing Medly Uganda, an mHealth application to improve self-care among Ugandan patients with heart failure. This application began as a smartphone but was adapted for the low-cost feature phones used widely throughout the country. It was also integrated into an mHealth system endorsed by the Ugandan Ministry of Health. When patients log in they are prompted to report on specific heart failure symptoms. The application then generates self-care instructions based on those symptoms. If a patient reports serious symptoms the application triggers an alert to the research nurse, who then consults with the patient, caregiver, and if needed, cardiologist, to establish a plan of care. This study proposes that an mHealth intervention tailored specifically to the local context will improve healthcare quality of life for patients with heart failure. The research team hypothesizes that heart failure patients who use the program will report improved scores on the Self-Care in Heart Failure Index. These scores will be assessed at baseline, three-month, and six-month visits. The researchers will also measure changes in patients' clinical conditions, including the 6-minute walk test, left ventricular ejection fraction, and frequency of acute care visits. Finally, the researchers will conduct qualitative interviews with patients and providers to understand their experiences.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Participants will be asked to initiate self-care sessions using the Medly Uganda application. They will dial the sub-code and enter a unique PIN to access the system. They are asked to do this every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday morning for six months, as well as anytime that they experience concerning symptoms. If a participant has not initiated a session by 11:00am on the designated days, the application will generate an SMS reminder. Each interactive session will present a series of symptom-based questions to the participant. These questions will be followed by a tailored SMS message. While session content will not remain on the participant's phone, the SMS messages will. This allows participants to retain and review messages, thereby reinforcing educational content. There are four status categories: Stable, Fluid Overload, Urgent, and Critical. If Stable, participants will be sent one of six encouraging and educational messages. If Fluid Overload, Urgent or Critical, patient participants will be sent a message that identifies the symptom and recommends an action and the on-duty nurse will be sent an accompanying alert. Urgent and Critical alerts will also be sent to the on-duty doctor. The nurse is expected to call the patient for Urgent and Critical alerts within 60 and 15 minutes, respectively. Nurse phone call interactions will be guided by a standard operating manual. One nurse and one doctor will be designated rotating 'on-duty' responsibility to monitor clinician alerts and the dashboard seven days a week. The doctor will be available to provide clinical supervision to the nurse as needed and they will have a daily in-person or by-phone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Uganda Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • UHI patient presenting for routine or urgent outpatient visit
  • Currently living in Uganda and not planning to travel abroad for six months
  • Age >=18 years
  • Symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association Class II or III and left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or less)
  • Access to a mobile phone
  • Basic reading skills in English, Luganda, and/or Runyankole

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy < six months
  • Active medical condition requiring hospitalization, such as cardiac ischemia (acute electrocardiographic changes and/or positive biomarkers, if available), syncope, or significant fluid overload
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: mHealth
Heart failure patients enrolled in the mHealth program
Patients at Uganda Heart Institute will be enrolled in an mHealth program intended to promote self-care for heart failure and improve their healthcare quality of life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Care for Heart Failure Index, Maintenance
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up
The Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) is a measure of self-care defined as a naturalistic decision-making process involving the choice of behaviors that maintain physiological stability (maintenance), the response to symptoms when they occur (management), and confidence in self-care (confidence). The self-care maintenance subscale includes 10 items asking how often patients check their heart failure symptoms and treatment adherence. The score is standardized to a 0- to 100-point range: raw score sum minus lowest possible raw scale score, then divided by the possible range of scores, and finally multiplied by 100. Higher score for each scale indicates better self-maintenance.
Baseline and Six-month follow-up
Self-Care for Heart Failure Index, Management
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up
The Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) is a measure of self-care defined as a naturalistic decision-making process involving the choice of behaviors that maintain physiological stability (maintenance), the response to symptoms when they occur (management), and confidence in self-care (confidence). The self-care management subscale includes 6 items if patients report any heart failure symptoms in the past month. Then based on the responses on how quick they recognize it as a symptom of heart failure and remedies they tried, the score is standardized to a 0- to 100-point range: raw score sum minus lowest possible raw scale score, then divided by the possible range of scores, and finally multiplied by 100. Higher score for each scale indicates better self-management.
Baseline and Six-month follow-up
Self-Care for Heart Failure Index, Confidence
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up
The Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) is a measure of self-care defined as a naturalistic decision-making process involving the choice of behaviors that maintain physiological stability (maintenance), the response to symptoms when they occur (management), and confidence in self-care (confidence). The self-care confidence subscale includes 6 items asking how confident that they can keep themselves free of symptoms, follow treatment advice, recognize changes in their health and etc.. The score is standardized to a 0- to 100-point range: raw score sum minus lowest possible raw scale score, then divided by the possible range of scores, and finally multiplied by 100. Higher score for each scale indicates better self-confidence
Baseline and Six-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EQ-5D-5L, Mobility
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Measure Description: Healthcare quality of life will be measured using the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). It is a validated instrument appropriate for use in lower and middle income countries. Each of the five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) comprises the EQ-5D descriptive system. We regrouped the 5 levels of perceived problems into binary responses as "no problem" (Level 1), or "Having problems" (Level 2-5).
Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
EQ-5D-5L, Self-Care
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Measure Description: Healthcare quality of life will be measured using the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). It is a validated instrument appropriate for use in lower and middle income countries. Each of the five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) comprises the EQ-5D descriptive system. We regrouped the 5 levels of perceived problems into binary responses as "no problem" (Level 1), or "Having problems" (Level 2-5).
Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
EQ-5D-5L, Usual Activities
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Measure Description: Healthcare quality of life will be measured using the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). It is a validated instrument appropriate for use in lower and middle income countries. Each of the five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) comprises the EQ-5D descriptive system. We regrouped the 5 levels of perceived problems into binary responses as "no problem" (Level 1), or "Having problems" (Level 2-5).
Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
EQ-5D-5L, Pain or Discomfort
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Measure Description: Healthcare quality of life will be measured using the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). It is a validated instrument appropriate for use in lower and middle income countries. Each of the five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) comprises the EQ-5D descriptive system. We regrouped the 5 levels of perceived problems into binary responses as "no problem" (Level 1), or "Having problems" (Level 2-5).
Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
EQ-5D-5L, Anxiety or Depression
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Measure Description: Healthcare quality of life will be measured using the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). It is a validated instrument appropriate for use in lower and middle income countries. Each of the five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) comprises the EQ-5D descriptive system. We regrouped the 5 levels of perceived problems into binary responses as "no problem" (Level 1), or "Having problems" (Level 2-5).
Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
EQ-5D-5L, VAS
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the 100 indicates 'The best health you can imagine' and 0 means 'The worst health you can imagine'.
Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Six-Minute Walk Test, Total Distance
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Patients' functional capacity will be assessed using the Six-Minute Walk Test, a widely-used, reproducible exercise test that serves as a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients. Outcome is measured as a distance in meters. Possible range is 0-700m. Healthy range is considered 400-700m but may not be normative for all populations, including people with chronic diseases. In this study difference in distance (meters) will be examined across visits, with a lower score reflecting worse function.
Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a widely-recognized clinical prognostic marker for heart failure patients. It is measured as a percentage. Possible range is 0-100. Low is <50%. High is >=50%. LVEF is measured by echocardiogram using Simpson biplane formula
Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Frequency of Acute Care Visits
Time Frame: Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit
Patients will be asked to report how often they required acute care for their heart failure outside of their usual care. This outcome is the frequency of acute care visits as categorical variable: 0, 1 and ≥2. Possible range is 0-31.
Baseline and Six-month follow-up visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeremy Schwartz, MD, Yale University
  • Principal Investigator: Isaac Ssinabulya, MMed, Uganda Heart Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 6, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 6, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000025338
  • 1R21TW010998-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on mHealth for heart failure patients in Uganda

3
Subscribe