A Digital Solution for Patients With Heart Failure

February 22, 2023 updated by: Sidekick Health

A Digital Solution for Patients With Heart Failure to Improve Disease Management, Lifestyle, and Quality of Life

The study aim is to determine whether a 12-month digitally delivered behaviour change solution for patients with heart failure improves symptom frequency, mental health, quality of life, medication adherence, and self-care behaviour. The primary and secondary endpoints will be captured at 6- and 12-months follow-up visits to assess longer term effect on outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Heart Failure (HF) is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in developed countries with a prevalence rate of 4.2% of the adult population and 11.8% among people ≥60 years of age. Worldwide HF affects about 26 million people and poses a significant burden on healthcare providers and patients. People with HF may have severe symptoms, and some may need a heart transplant or implantation of a ventricular assist device. Important modifiable HF risk factors are smoking, physical inactivity, overweight and obesity, and an unhealthy diet. Lifestyle changes by HF patients are known to reduce HF-related hospital (re)admission, morbidity and mortality.

Guideline-directed treatment of HF includes among others pharmacotherapy, implantation of devices, regular exercise, and enrolment in a multidisciplinary care management program. Components of the multidisciplinary care management program are among others: patient education with an emphasis on adherence and self-care, patient involvement in symptom monitoring, and follow-up after discharge (for instance through remote monitoring). Adherence to the recommendations has proven difficult. A digitally delivered solution that provides remote symptom monitoring and lifestyle intervention support may support HF patients to halt or reverse disease progression and improve their quality of life. This study aims to digitally provide remote symptom monitoring and lifestyle intervention via a mobile platform (Sidekick Health) with the primary aim to determine the effectiveness of adding Sidekick Health's digital solution for HF patients to the standard care treatment by changes in the KCCQ-12 scores. The secondary aims are to determine the effect on other clinical outcomes (echocardiograms, biomarkers, metabolic syndrome symptoms, HF disease progression), other health-related outcomes (self-care, medication adherence, cardiorespiratory fitness, disease knowledge, smoking status, and anxiety, depression, and stress-levels), and cost-effectiveness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

174

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Reykjavík, Iceland
        • Landspitali University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with confirmed congestive HF registered at the outpatient heart failure clinic at the Landspitali University Hospital
  • Participants should be on one of these medications for heart failure treatment: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) inhibitors, or Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor
  • Participants with all stages of HF will be included (NYHA classes I-IV)
  • Started their medical HF treatment at least 1 month prior to study enrollment
  • Participants should be willing and able to comply with study procedures and attend the scheduled visits
  • Capacity to consent to informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HF due to reversible causes (e.g., myocarditis) or severe aortic valve stenosis
  • Not owning a smartphone compatible with the Sidekick Health digital solution
  • Not knowing how to operate a smartphone
  • Moderate to severe dementia
  • Unable to understand written and verbal instructions in Icelandic.
  • estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) <15 ml/min
  • Planned dialysis in the next 6 months
  • Planned cardiac transplant surgery
  • Active drug/alcohol abuse
  • Other serious illness (e.g., cancer, endocarditis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital solution group
Participants will be instructed to download a remote symptom monitoring and lifestyle-changing mobile application to which they will have access for 12 months. The program aims to provide remote symptom monitoring by having participants enter data (on diet, exercise, weight, etc) and answer questionnaires via the SidekickHealth platform, and to empower positive lifestyle changes. Beyond this, all patients in the interventional arm will also receive standard of care as defined below for the control arm.
A digital solution that provides remote symptom monitoring and support of lifestyle-changes by gamification, altruistic rewards, and engaging content with relevant tasks or missions to be completed.
The best medical therapy including start or optimization of secondary preventive pharmacotherapy, and advise on modifiable risk factors. The participants in the control arm will also receive an information leaflet about relevant lifestyle modifications for HF.
Active Comparator: Standard of care - control group
All participants in the control arm will receive best medical therapy including start or optimization of secondary preventive pharmacotherapy, and advise on modifiable risk factors. The participants in the control arm will also receive an information leaflet about relevant lifestyle modifications for HF. After the baseline measurements and data collection, there will be scheduled visits to a health care provider at 3, 6, and 12 months.
The best medical therapy including start or optimization of secondary preventive pharmacotherapy, and advise on modifiable risk factors. The participants in the control arm will also receive an information leaflet about relevant lifestyle modifications for HF.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness for patients with HF
Time Frame: 12 months

Change in HF-induced symptom frequency, physical and social limitations, and quality of life impairment, from baseline to 12 months. This primary outcome will be as measured with the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12).

The KCCQ-12 score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100, where 100 is the best possible score indicating no symptoms, no limitations, and an excellent quality of life.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resource utilization (cost-effectiveness)
Time Frame: 12 months
Resource utilization (e.g. number of visits over time to the ER, hospital outpatient unit (and hospital visits in general) due to worsening of heart failure at 6 and 12 months.
12 months
Echocardiogram - ejection fraction
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in ejection fraction (percent value) for patients with Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) at 6 months.
6 months
Echocardiogram - change in left atrium size
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in left atrium size for patients with Heart failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) at 6 months.
6 months
HF-specific laboratory values
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at 6 months.
6 months
Symptoms of the metabolic syndrome (MetSyn).
Time Frame: 6 months
Participant number of MetSyn features (0-5) change from baseline to 6 months, compared between groups.
6 months
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in outcomes on the 6 minute walking test (6MWT) from baseline to 6 months
6 months
HF disease progression classified with NYHA
Time Frame: 12 months
Compare changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification from baseline to 6 and 12 months. The NYHA classifies heart disease in four classes, I to IV, based on symptoms. Class IV is the most severe heart disease.
12 months
HF disease progression classified with Killip
Time Frame: 12 months
Compare changes in Killip classification from baseline to 6 and 12 months. Killip classifies acute myocard infarction patients into four classes: class I to IV. Class IV is the most severe case with the highest mortality risk.
12 months
Medication adherence
Time Frame: 12 months
Compare self-reported medication adherence from baseline to 6 and 12 months, using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and electronic health record (EHR) medication refill information.
12 months
Patient self-care
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare between groups score from the nine-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour (EHFScB-9) scale from baseline to 3 and 6 months. The score on the EHFScB-9 scale can range from a minimum of 9 to a maximum of 45, with higher scores indicating worse self-care.
6 months
Patient disease knowledge
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare between groups score from a 6-item HF disease-specific knowledge questionnaire, from baseline to 3 and 6 months. The score on the questionnaire can range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30, with higher scores indicating less HF disease specific knowledge.
6 months
Smoking status
Time Frame: 6 months
Changes in self-reported smoking status, from baseline to 6 months.
6 months
Depression, anxiety, and stress-levels
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in outcomes on the 21-item Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months. The DASS-21 consists of three 7-item scales on which the scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety, depression, or stress.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploratory Objective: Outcome prediction and validation between in-app and clinical metrics
Time Frame: 12 months
Associations between physical assessments and vital signs, clinical questionnaire outcomes, in-app PROs and stress levels, energy levels and quality of sleep.
12 months
Exploratory Objective: Predictive value of the disease specific in-app remote symptom monitoring for HF disease progression.
Time Frame: 12 months
In-app disease specific remote symptom monitoring score change compared to changes over time in the other outcome measures.
12 months
Safety objective: Monitor the safety and any potential adverse effects of the digital solution on patients and outcomes.
Time Frame: 12 months
Therapy discontinuation or adverse event reportings due to participation in the intervention.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized individual participant data (IPD) may be shared with other researchers for relevant research purposes following complementary ethical review and approval from the Ethical Review Board.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on A digital care solution for patients with Heart Failure

Subscribe