rTMS Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasia

January 10, 2024 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disease in which language function is gradually and progressively impaired. Patients will eventually be disabled in communication and have cognition deficits, which put a heavy burden not only on their families but also on the whole society. However, no effective treatment for PPA has been explored so far. The current clinical randomized trial is to study the safety and efficacy of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of PPA. Also, multi-modality of neuroimaging techniques, such as functional MRI and PET will be used to investigate brain network changing in this procedure.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

33 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of PPA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scored below 15 on the mini-mental state exam (MMSE)
  • history of seizures or unexplained loss of consciousness
  • pregnancy
  • surgical breach of the skull
  • MRI contraindication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: sham treatment group
The control group is to receive sham treatment. The device is the same as the one used in the real treatment group.
The device is made in London,UK
Experimental: rTMS treatment group
The participants will be divided into the rTMS treatment group and the sham treatment group by means of randomized methods.The protocol of the treatment is to use rTMS with high frequency 10/20Hz 120%RMT 20 times for one month. The device is Magtism rTMS made in London, UK
The device is made in London,UK

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Boston naming test evaluation
Time Frame: 1 day before the treatment
Assessment of the language production. Scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 day before the treatment
Boston naming test evaluation
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Assessment of the language production. Scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Speech fluency
Time Frame: 1 day before the treatment
Assessment of the language production. Scores range from 0 to 20. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 day before the treatment
Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Speech fluency
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Assessment of the language production. Scores range from 0 to 20. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Repetition
Time Frame: 1 day before the treatment
Assessment of the repetition ability. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 day before the treatment
Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Repetition
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Assessment of the repetition ability. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Word recognition
Time Frame: 1 day before the treatment
Assessment of the reading. Scores range from 0 to 60. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 day before the treatment
Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Word recognition
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Assessment of the reading. Scores range from 0 to 60. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Syntax comprehension part of Bilingual aphasia test (Standard Modern Chinese Version)
Time Frame: 1 day before the treatment
Assessment of the grammar ability. Scores range from 0 to 50. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 day before the treatment
Syntax comprehension part of Bilingual aphasia test (Standard Modern Chinese Version)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Assessment of the grammar ability. Scores range from 0 to 50. Higher scores means better outcome.
1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
functional connectivity map (FC map)
Time Frame: 1 day before the treatment
Functional Connectivity was examined using a seed-based voxel-wise correlation approach. The language related brain areas, such as Broca Area and Wernicke Area, were defined as the regions of interest (ROI). Pearson's correlation analysis between the time course of the ROI and that of every voxel in the whole brain was computed for a map of correlation coefficients, which were Fisher's z-transformed and called as z-FC maps. This outcome measurement, the z-FC map, is not numeric data. Z-FC map is a radiographic imaging measurement.
1 day before the treatment
functional connectivity map (FC map)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Functional Connectivity was examined using a seed-based voxel-wise correlation approach. The language related brain areas, such as Broca Area and Wernicke Area, were defined as the regions of interest (ROI). Pearson's correlation analysis between the time course of the ROI and that of every voxel in the whole brain was computed for a map of correlation coefficients, which were Fisher's z-transformed and called as z-FC maps. This outcome measurement, the z-FC map, is not numeric data. Z-FC map is a radiographic imaging measurement.
1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)
Time Frame: 1 day before the treatment
PET parameter to evaluate brain metabolism
1 day before the treatment
Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment
PET parameter to evaluate brain metabolism
1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Progressive Aphasia

Clinical Trials on Magstim rTMS

3
Subscribe