Targeted TDCS to Enhance Speech-Language Treatment Outcome in Persons With Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia. (AphasiatDCS)

May 20, 2026 updated by: Jessica Richardson, University of New Mexico

Targeted Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance Speech-Language Treatment Outcome in Persons With Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia

62 patients who are one year post stroke and have Aphasia as a result of that stroke will be recruited. Participants will have 4 assessment sessions and 15 treatment sessions. The TDCS will be to right Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG) (25 active, 25 sham) for 15 days. A combined semantic feature analysis/phonological components analysis treatment will be paired with the stimulation. Two assessment sessions will be pretreatment, 1 session immediately post-treatment, and 1 session at 3 months follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Our long-term goal is to develop safe and effective treatments for the communication problems of Aphasia due to stroke that restore patients to higher levels of functioning, decrease disability, and promote higher quality of life. While language therapy for aphasia is effective, improvements are typically slow, and gains may be small. Noninvasive brain stimulation has been suggested as a method to enhance outcomes from language therapy. This study will examine whether outcomes for language therapy with brain stimulation are different from outcomes for language therapy without brain stimulation in people with aphasia. Our central hypotheses are (1) targeted right hemisphere HDtDCS (RH-HD-tDCS) administered in combination with language treatment will result in greater changes in naming accuracy than language treatment with the sham RH-HD-tDCS (2) RH-HD-tDCS plus language treatment will result in greater increases in communication within the affected hemisphere compared to language treatment plus sham RH-HD-tDCS (3) RH-HD-tDCS plus language treatment will result in greater increases in perilesional areas working together immediately post-treatment compared to language treatment plus sham RH-HD-tDCS

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
        • Recruiting
        • University of New Mexico Center for Brain Recovery and Repair
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. aged 25-85
  2. must be greater than 6 months post-stroke
  3. must have a diagnosis of aphasia based on impaired performance on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised, Boston Naming Test, or during discourse production
  4. must be left-hemisphere dominant as demonstrated by aphasia onset subsequent to left hemisphere damage
  5. must be stimulable for naming

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. comorbid neurological disease.
  2. damage to the anterior right hemisphere.
  3. significant mood disorder.
  4. substance/alcohol dependence or abuse within the past year
  5. presence of any implanted electrical device or contraindications to tDCS or MRI
  6. recent medical instability (within 4 weeks)
  7. pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Experimental: Active cathodal tDCS + Speech-language training
In this arm, 31 patients with stroke induced Aphasia will undergo 15 sessions of active tDCS (x 30 minutes of stimulation) combined with 1 hour simultaneous speech-language training on consecutive weekdays.

Cathodal tDCS raises neuronal membrane potentials, leading to decreased probability of depolarization from incoming stimuli.

Speech and Language training involves a combined semantic feature analysis and phonological components analysis treatment.

Other Names:
  • Behavioral: Speech and Language Training
Sham Comparator: Comparator: Placebo cathodal tDCS + Speech-language training
In this arm, 31 patients with stroke induced Aphasia will undergo 15 sessions of sham tDCS (x 30 minutes sham) combined with 1 hour simultaneous speech-language training on consecutive weekdays..
Speech and Language training involves a combined semantic feature analysis and phonological components analysis treatment. .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Picture Naming of trained items
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in naming of pictures of trained items; 60 pictured items; higher score indicates improvement
3 months
Naming Response Time of trained items Scales - IV (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, Coalson, & Railford, 2008)
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in response time of naming of pictures of trained items; 0-20 seconds, decreased response time indicates improvement Scales - IV (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, Coalson, & Railford, 2008)
3 months
Naming Efficiency of trained items
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in efficiency of naming of pictures of trained items; median response time divided by proportion correct naming; smaller numbers indicate greater efficiency
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discourse informativeness - Main Concept Production
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in discourse informativeness as measured by main concept scores; increased values indicate improvement
3 months
Efficiency of discourse informativeness - Main Concept Production
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in efficiency of discourse informativeness; accurate and complete main concepts produced over the time of discourse elicitation (ACs/min); larger numbers indicate greater efficiency
3 months
Picture Naming of untrained items - Boston Naming Test
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in naming of pictures of untrained items; 60 pictured items; higher score indicates improvement
3 months
Naming Response Time of untrained items - Boston Naming Test
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in response time of naming of pictures of untrained items; 0-20 seconds, decreased response time indicates improvement
3 months
Naming Efficiency of untrained items - Boston Naming Test
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in efficiency of naming of pictures of untrained items; median response time divided by proportion correct naming; smaller numbers indicate greater efficiency
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 26, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Active Comparator: Experimental: Active cathodal tDCS + language training

Subscribe