Effects of Basic Body Awareness Therapy on Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

June 18, 2020 updated by: KTO Karatay University

Effects of Basic Body Awareness Therapy on Pain, Balance and Proprioceptive Sense in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) and conventional therapies (CT) on pain, balance and proprioceptive sensation of cervical region in patients with chronic neck pain. As a cross-over study, patients were divided into BBAT / CT (n=17) and CT / BBAT (n=18) groups. BBAT program has been implemented to patients within group BBAT / CT two days a week for 6 weeks while group CT / BBAT received the CT program during the same period. After the interval of 5-week, group BBAT / CT was treated with CT and group CT / BBAT was treated with BBAT. Pain severity with; Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), disability level with; Neck Disability Index (NDI), cervical proprioception with; Cervical Range of Motion Deluxe (CROM) device, balance with; Computerized Dynamic Posturography were evaluated. The evaluations were conducted before and after the first and second treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chronic neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disease that affects many people at some point in life.Its prevalence in the general population varies between 30-50% and is more common in women over 50 years old.The cervical area is an important body part due to the sensorial receptors of the muscles and joints as well as central and reflexes connections with visual, vestibular, and postural control systems.Numerous sensorimotor disorders have been detected in patients with chronic neck pain.Some patients with neck pain have impaired proprioceptive sensation and postural control.Pain can affect presynaptic inhibition of muscle afferents and modulation of proprioceptive muscle spindles, causing prolonged delays.These changes may result in decreased muscle control and increased postural release.Different updated and conventional therapy (CT) methods are used for the treatment of neck pain. Mobilization of soft tissue and joint, stabilization techniques, cervical collars, relaxation training, strengthening exercises, and posture arrangement by body awareness are common therapeutic modalities. Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) is a method used by physiotherapists to increase patient awareness and control posture.The method is increasingly used in the treatment of painful conditions related to the chronic musculoskeletal system.However, there are not enough studies in the literature examining the effects of proprioceptive senses and postural control in patients with chronic neck pain. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of BBAT and conventional treatments (CT) on pain, balance and proprioceptive sensation of the cervical region in patients with chronic neck pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Konya, Turkey, 42020
        • KTO Karatay University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being 18 or over,
  • Having neck pain for more than 3 months,
  • Having neck problems that do not cause neurological deficits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cervical vertebra fracture or spinal tumor,
  • Those diagnosed with cervical dystonia,
  • Whiplash-related disorders,
  • Those diagnosed with vertigo, fibromyalgia, or rheumatoid arthritis,
  • The presence of inflammatory disease or infection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group BBAT / CT
Group BBAT / CT started treatment with BBAT and received 2 days a week for 6 weeks. After the interval of 5-week, group BBAT / CT was treated with CT twice a week for 6 weeks.
The BBAT was applied by a trained and certified physiotherapist in this area for about an hour, two days a week, as a group therapy. The BBAT program includes movements related to daily activities such as lying, sitting, standing and walking. BBAT focuses on basic movement principles such as postural stability, energy adjustment in movements, comfortable breathing and coordination.
The CT program was applied two days a week for about an hour. The CT program includes active range of motion (ROM) exercises, stretching, isometric and resistant strengthening, posture exercises and relaxation training.
Experimental: Group CT / BBAT
Group CT / BBAT started treatment with CT and received 2 days a week for 6 weeks. After the interval of 5-week, group CT / BBAT was treated with BBAT twice a week for 6 weeks.
The BBAT was applied by a trained and certified physiotherapist in this area for about an hour, two days a week, as a group therapy. The BBAT program includes movements related to daily activities such as lying, sitting, standing and walking. BBAT focuses on basic movement principles such as postural stability, energy adjustment in movements, comfortable breathing and coordination.
The CT program was applied two days a week for about an hour. The CT program includes active range of motion (ROM) exercises, stretching, isometric and resistant strengthening, posture exercises and relaxation training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Balance
Time Frame: at the beginning of treatments
The balance assessed by the Sensorial Organization Test (SOT) in the Computerized Dynamic Posturography device.The results of the SOT are calculated according to anterior-posterior sways. A balance score ranging from 0 to 100 is achieved, where 0 indicates loss of balance and 100 indicates excellent stability.
at the beginning of treatments
Balance
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
The balance assessed by the Sensorial Organization Test (SOT) in the Computerized Dynamic Posturography device.The results of the SOT are calculated according to anterior-posterior sways. A balance score ranging from 0 to 100 is achieved, where 0 indicates loss of balance and 100 indicates excellent stability.
6 weeks later
Balance
Time Frame: 11 weeks later
The balance assessed by the Sensorial Organization Test (SOT) in the Computerized Dynamic Posturography device.The results of the SOT are calculated according to anterior-posterior sways. A balance score ranging from 0 to 100 is achieved, where 0 indicates loss of balance and 100 indicates excellent stability.
11 weeks later
Balance
Time Frame: 17 weeks later
The balance assessed by the Sensorial Organization Test (SOT) in the Computerized Dynamic Posturography device.The results of the SOT are calculated according to anterior-posterior sways. A balance score ranging from 0 to 100 is achieved, where 0 indicates loss of balance and 100 indicates excellent stability.
17 weeks later
Neck proprioception
Time Frame: at the beginning of treatments
Proprioceptive sensation was evaluated using the Cervical Range of Motion Deluxe (CROM, Deluxe Performance Attainment Associates, Lindstrom, Minnesota, USA) device.Joint position error and deflection angles of the head in all 3 planes were measured with CROM device.
at the beginning of treatments
Neck proprioception
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
Proprioceptive sensation was evaluated using the Cervical Range of Motion Deluxe (CROM, Deluxe Performance Attainment Associates, Lindstrom, Minnesota, USA) device.Joint position error and deflection angles of the head in all 3 planes were measured with CROM device.
6 weeks later
Neck proprioception
Time Frame: 11 weeks later
Proprioceptive sensation was evaluated using the Cervical Range of Motion Deluxe (CROM, Deluxe Performance Attainment Associates, Lindstrom, Minnesota, USA) device.Joint position error and deflection angles of the head in all 3 planes were measured with CROM device.
11 weeks later
Neck proprioception
Time Frame: 17 weeks later
Proprioceptive sensation was evaluated using the Cervical Range of Motion Deluxe (CROM, Deluxe Performance Attainment Associates, Lindstrom, Minnesota, USA) device.Joint position error and deflection angles of the head in all 3 planes were measured with CROM device.
17 weeks later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain severity
Time Frame: at the beginning of treatments
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to determine the severity of pain in the patients with neck pain. Patients were asked to indicate their pain levels on a scale of 0-10 cm. The value "0" indicates no pain while the value "10" indicates unbearable pain.
at the beginning of treatments
Pain severity
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to determine the severity of pain in the patients with neck pain. Patients were asked to indicate their pain levels on a scale of 0-10 cm. The value "0" indicates no pain while the value "10" indicates unbearable pain.
6 weeks later
Pain severity
Time Frame: 11 weeks later
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to determine the severity of pain in the patients with neck pain. Patients were asked to indicate their pain levels on a scale of 0-10 cm. The value "0" indicates no pain while the value "10" indicates unbearable pain.
11 weeks later
Pain severity
Time Frame: 17 weeks later
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to determine the severity of pain in the patients with neck pain. Patients were asked to indicate their pain levels on a scale of 0-10 cm. The value "0" indicates no pain while the value "10" indicates unbearable pain.
17 weeks later
Neck disability level
Time Frame: at the beginning of treatments
The Neck Disability Index was used to determine the patients' neck disability levels. There are ten sections of the scale that question the severity of pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation, consisting of 6 questions. Item scores range from 0 (no disability) to 5 (total disability).
at the beginning of treatments
Neck disability level
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
The Neck Disability Index was used to determine the patients' neck disability levels. There are ten sections of the scale that question the severity of pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation, consisting of 6 questions. Item scores range from 0 (no disability) to 5 (total disability).
6 weeks later
Neck disability level
Time Frame: 11 weeks later
The Neck Disability Index was used to determine the patients' neck disability levels. There are ten sections of the scale that question the severity of pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation, consisting of 6 questions. Item scores range from 0 (no disability) to 5 (total disability).
11 weeks later
Neck disability level
Time Frame: 17 weeks later
The Neck Disability Index was used to determine the patients' neck disability levels. There are ten sections of the scale that question the severity of pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation, consisting of 6 questions. Item scores range from 0 (no disability) to 5 (total disability).
17 weeks later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on BBAT

3
Subscribe