Impact of Artificial Intelligence Genius® System-assisted Colonoscopy vs. Standard Colonoscopy (COLO-GENIUS) (COLO-GENIUS)

April 30, 2022 updated by: Clinique Paris-Bercy

Impact of Artificial Intelligence Genius® System-assisted Colonoscopy vs. Standard Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rate in Routine Practice: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This controlled-randomized trial compares the artificial intelligence Genius® system assisted (Genius+) to standard (Genius-) colonoscopy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Genius® system on ADR in routine colonoscopy. The secondary aims will be the impact of Genius® system on polyp detection rate (PDR), serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR), advanced neoplasia detection rate (ANDR), mean number of polyps (MNP), polyp type and localization, and operator type (according to basal ADR).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Any patient seen by gastroenterologists working in the endoscopy unit and meeting the inclusion criteria may be recruited.

The patient will be offered to participate in the study. The information form as well as the consent, will be given to the patient for a good understanding of the study and the investigator in charge of the patient gives all the additional explanations necessary for this good understanding (but of the study, the course, risks and benefits).

A period of reflection will be left to the patient or his family to make a free decision whether or not to participate in the study.

After the consent to participate will be signed by the gastroenterologist and the patient, the patient will be randomized. The use of the Genius® system will depend on the randomization that will be performed at the start of the colonoscopy.

This randomization will be done in the computer examination room using the randomization software.

The patient will therefore be randomized into 2 groups:

Arm 1- Standard colonoscopy Arm 2- Colonoscopy assisted by Genius® system

A comparison of the two groups standard colonoscopy vs colonoscopy assisted by Genius® system will be made as following:

A-Main criterion:

- Adenoma detection rate (ADR)

B-Secondary criteria:

Polyps detection rate (PDR) Proximal serrated polyps detection rate (PSPDR) Neoplasia detection rate (NDR) Mean number of polyps (MNP) Mean number of adenomas (MNA) Factors associated with ADR

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Charenton-le-Pont, France, 94220
        • Clinique PARIS-BERCY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient scheduled for total colonoscopic exploration, during the period study
  • Patient over or equal to 18 years
  • ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3
  • No participation in another clinical study
  • Certificate of non opposition signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under 18 years old
  • ASA 4, ASA 5
  • Pregnant woman
  • Patient with coagulation abnormalities preventing polypectomy: prothrombin level <50%, Platelets <50000 / mm3, effective anti-coagulation in progress, clopidogrel in progress.
  • Patient referred for resection of a known polyp
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Known colonic stenosis
  • Diverticulitis less than 6 weeks old
  • Patient unable to give consent or protected by law
  • Opposition expressed for inclusion in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1- Standard colonoscopy
Standard colonoscopy is performed
Standard Colonoscopy without Genius® Intelligence System is performed
Active Comparator: Arm 2- Colonoscopy assisted by Genius
Colonoscopy assisted by Genius artificial intelligence system is performed
Genius® Intelligence System is used to assist Colonoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)
Time Frame: 1 day
percentage of colonoscopy with one or more adenoma of the colon
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Advanced Neoplasia Detection Rate (ANDR)
Time Frame: 1 day
percentage of colonoscopy with one or more advanced neoplasia of the colon
1 day
Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate (PSPDR)
Time Frame: 1 day
percentage of colonoscopy with one or more serrated polyp of the colon
1 day
Polyp Detection Rate (PDR)
Time Frame: 1 day
percentage of colonoscopy with one or more polyp of the colon
1 day
The factors influencing the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)
Time Frame: 1 day
Withdrawal time (in seconds): time of exploration from the caecum to the anal verge
1 day
The factors influencing the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)
Time Frame: 1 day
Boston scale (0 to 9)
1 day
Time to reach caecum (sec)
Time Frame: 1 day
Time to reach caecum from the beginning of the procedure (in seconds)
1 day
Caecal intubation rate (%)
Time Frame: 1 day
Caecal intubation rate (complete colonoscopy)
1 day
Morbidity: perforation rate (%)
Time Frame: 7 days after procedure
Perforation rates (%)
7 days after procedure
Morbidity: bleeding rate (%)
Time Frame: 7 days after procedure
Bleeding rates (%)
7 days after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: David Karsenti, MD, Clinique PARIS-BERCY

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colonic Polyp

Clinical Trials on Standard Colonoscopy

3
Subscribe