The Sleep and Teamwork in EMS Study (SaFTiE)

May 9, 2025 updated by: Daniel Patterson, PhD, NRP, University of Pittsburgh

Real-time Intervention to Reduce Fatigue Among Emergency Medical Services Workers: A Cluster-randomized Trial

More than half of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) workers report work-related mental and physical fatigue. Odds of injury among fatigued EMS workers are nearly double that of non-fatigued workers. There is a compelling need to reduce fatigue among EMS workers, yet few EMS organizations have a formal fatigue management program and many may not be cost-effective or evidence-based. This trial addresses national goals of the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) and tests a novel approach to fatigue risk management that is easily scalable to large workforces and low-cost for employers of shift workers.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators will test an enhanced version of our SleepTrackTXT pilot intervention - Sleep and Fatigue Treatment in EMS (SaFTiE) - in a two-arm parallel cluster-randomized design of EMS agencies. Our unit of randomization will be the EMS agency, with the intervention deployed as a Fatigue Risk Management Program that can be integrated into an agency's existing program. During the active intervention phase, the investigators will use SaFTiE and an attention placebo control (APC) group to test the specific effect of our multi-component intervention on EMS worker fatigue and sleep health.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

708

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15261
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Live in United States (including Hawaii and Alaska)
  • Licensed / certified EMS clinician
  • Currently work in shifts
  • Do at least one clinical shift per week
  • Own a smartphone
  • Willing to answer monthly surveys and daily text-messages,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclude EMS personnel who are primarily administrative with non-clinical duties
  • Are restricted from using personal smartphone during periods of work
  • Do not own a smartphone capable of running the study mobile app

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SaFTiE
The SaFTiE intervention includes: [a] real-time text-message assessments of fatigue and sleep during and between scheduled shift work; [b] tailored text-message alerts that promote adopting evidence based strategies for mitigating fatigue when high levels of fatigue or sleepiness are reported; [c] a mobile app that delivers goal setting, summary data of sleep/fatigue indicators from all study participants, and video interviews of EMS clinicians focused on sleep and fatigue.
A multi-modal fatigue risk management program.
Placebo Comparator: Attention Placebo Control
The attention placebo control includes: [a] real-time text-message assessments of teamwork during and between scheduled shift work; [b] text-message alerts that promote techniques for mitigating poor teamwork when episodes of poor teamwork are reported; [c] a mobile app that delivers goal setting, summary data of teamwork indicators from all study participants, and video interviews of EMS clinicians focused on teamwork.
A multi-modal teamwork assessment program.
Other Names:
  • Teamwork

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: At baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
A response of 4 or greater on the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ) [minimum score=0, maximum score=11, and scores >=4 indicate mental and physical fatigue]
At baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
The PSQI measures sleep quality using a survey instrument with scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Poor Sleep Quality
Time Frame: At 6 months
A response of 6 or greater on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [minimum score=0, maximum score=21, and scores >=6 indicate poor sleep quality]
At 6 months
Inter-Shift Recovery Measure
Time Frame: At baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
This is the Inter-Shift Recovery sub-scale of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER) questionnaire. Individual item responses are coded 0 to 6 and summed, divided by 30, then multiplied by 100 to produce a composite sub-scale score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the inter-shift sub-scale signify greater/improved ability to recover between shifts. The OFER has no minimum thresholds to define clinically meaningful change in fatigue or recovery.
At baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Acute Fatigue Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
This is the Acute Fatigue sub-scale of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER) questionnaire. Individual item responses are coded 0 to 6 and summed, divided by 30, then multiplied by 100 to produce a composite sub-scale score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the acute fatigue sub-scale (e.g., 50-100) signify moderate to high acute fatigue. The OFER has no minimum thresholds to define clinically meaningful change in fatigue or recovery.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Chronic Fatigue Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
This is the Chronic Fatigue sub-scale of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER) questionnaire. Individual item responses are coded 0 to 6 and summed, divided by 30, then multiplied by 100 to produce a composite sub-scale score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the chronic fatigue sub-scales (e.g., 50-100) signify moderate to high chronic fatigue. The OFER has no minimum thresholds to define clinically meaningful change in fatigue or recovery.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: P. Daniel Patterson, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 11, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY19040354
  • R01OH011502 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The investigators will work with NIOSH/CDC and share de-identified research data via a NIOSH/CDC or NIH managed repository if requested. The study team will develop a process to receive requests from outside the study team for de-identified datasets should there be no NIOSH/CDC supported data repository.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Following publication of the primary study papers with primary and secondary outcomes reported.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The study team will develop a process to receive requests from outside the study team for de-identified datasets should there be no NIOSH/CDC supported data repository.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

Subscribe