Plane Block vs Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia

November 6, 2020 updated by: DILEK YAZICIOGLU, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Randomized Controlled Comparison of the Erector Spina Plane Block and Modified Thoracolumbar Interfacial Plane Block and Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Disc Surgery

Acute postoperative pain begins with surgical trauma and decreases with tissue healing. Untreatable postoperative pain is one of the most important problems due to the increase in respiratory, cardiac and thromboembolic complications. Lumber disc surgery is widely performed, and patients often complain of postoperative pain.

Preventing and managing postoperative pain after lumber disc surgery is very important for anesthetists. For this purpose, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, intravenous opioids, preemptive analgesia methods, intravenous patient controlled analgesia methods and regional anesthesia techniques are used within the multimodal analgesia strategy.

Regional anesthesia techniques are becoming increasingly widespread due to their efficiency and increased applicability thanks to the use of ultrasonography. Regional anesthesia techniques used in lumber disc surgery include paravertebral block, local anesthetic infiltration, epidural analgesia, and erector spina plan block and modified thoracolumbar interfacial plan block in recent years.

The erector spina plane block was first described in 2016, and the thoracolumbar interfacial plane block in 2015, and its modification was developed in 2017. Although they vary depending on the level of application, they offer analgesic activity in a wide range. Although there are publications about the use of these blocks for postoperative analgesia after lumber surgeries, which block is more effective has not been investigated.

This study may contribute to the development of new options for pain management after lumber disc surgery by comparing erector spina plane block and modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block, which have recently been used for postoperative pain treatment, with limited research, with each other and the standard technique, intravenous patient controlled analgesia, can add new applications to multimodal analgesia methods, increase patient satisfaction and contribute to the early recovery process.

The objective is to compare the erector spina plane block and modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block in patients undergoing lumber disc surgery with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in terms of analgesic efficacy.

Hypothesis The erector spina plane block and modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block may decrease the postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption and time to first analgesic requirement compared with intravenous patient controlled analgesia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing lumber disc surgery will be randomised into 3 groups. To receive either Erector spina plane block (ESP) or Modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block (MTI) or Intravenous patient controlled analgesia IV-PCA.

Patients in the ESP and MTI groups will receive the blocks before anesthesia induction in the preoperative holding area.

All patients will receive IV-PCA with tramadol. Postoperative analgesia will be evaluated with a numeric rating scale at postoperative recovery room admittance, postoperative 1st , second, 4th, 12th and 24th hours both at rest and during movement.

Postoperative tramadol consumption and time to first tramadol demand will be determined.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06110
        • Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing elective lumber discectomy or laminectomy
  • Adults
  • Aged 18-65
  • America Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Chronic pain condition
  • Allergic to study drugs
  • Recurrent surgical cases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erector spina plane block (ESP)
Patients will receive Erector spina plane block (ESP) with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia
Patient will receive ultrasound guided regional anesthesia with bupivacaine and intravenous patient controlled analgesia with tramadol
Experimental: Modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block (MTI)
Patients will receive Modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane block (MTI) with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia
Patient will receive ultrasound guided regional anesthesia with bupivacaine and intravenous patient controlled analgesia with tramadol
Active Comparator: Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA)
Patients will receive Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with tramadol for postoperative analgesia
Patient will receive intravenous patient controlled analgesia with tramadol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: 10 minutes after extubation
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
10 minutes after extubation
Pain score
Time Frame: postoperative 1st hour
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 1st hour
Pain score
Time Frame: postoperative 2nd hour
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 2nd hour
Pain score
Time Frame: postoperative 4th hour
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 4th hour
Pain score
Time Frame: postoperative 12th hour
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 12th hour
Pain score
Time Frame: postoperative 24th hour
Pain will be evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10 points; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain)
postoperative 24th hour
Tramadol consumption
Time Frame: postoperative 24th hour
Tramadol consumption will be determined from the ambulatory infusion pump (Abott)
postoperative 24th hour
Time to first analgesia request
Time Frame: 10 minutes after extubation
Time to first tramadol request will be determined from the ambulatory infusion pump (Abott)
10 minutes after extubation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ÜNAL Dr YAZICIOĞLU, Assoc Prof, DISKAPI YILDIRIM BEYAZIT TEACHING HOSPITAL

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical Trials on Erector spina plane block (ESP)

Subscribe