Assessment of Olfactory Dysfunction in SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection (ODYSSI)

June 26, 2025 updated by: Ekpemi Irune, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Objective Assessment of Olfactory Dysfunction and Impact on Quality of Life in SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19)Infection Using the UPSIT, eQOD and SNOT-22 Questionnaires: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

This study is designed to investigate the acuity of olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 positive patients in the United Kingdom. In particular defining severity with objective testing and determining if this has any predictive value on the outcome of the SARS CoV-2 infection. In addition, this study will strive to determine duration / natural history of olfactory dysfunction in these patients in respect to a positive SARS CoV-2 diagnosis. It should also demonstrate the impact of olfactory dysfunction on patient Quality of Life (QOL).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective of this study is to evaluate olfactory acuity by means of a multidimensional assessment protocol to objectively demonstrate the severity of olfactory dysfunction in patients diagnosed with SARS CoV-2. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) will be used to assess olfactory function in newly diagnosed patients and also existing patients longitudinally over a 12-month period. This is to document onset (where possible) and rate of progress of olfactory dysfunction.

In relevant cases, the investigators will correlate their findings with severity of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) arising as a result of the infection - characterised as mild, moderate and severe according to the Berlin classification. The investigators will therefore determine if the degree of olfactory dysfunction correlates in any manner to the severity of ARDS developed in a positive SARS CoV-2 patient and if it offers any prognosticative applications.

The investigators will also examine the impact of the symptom of olfactory dysfunction on patient Quality of Life using two validated tools known as the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders for English speakers (eQOD) and the SNOT-22 questionnaire.

Furthermore, outcomes will be explored and stratified in terms of age, gender and ethnicity

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Addenbrookes Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, W6 8RF
        • Charing Cross Hospital
      • Truro, United Kingdom, TR1 3LQ
        • Royal Cornwall Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study group will comprise patients diagnosed with the SARS Cov-2 infection at the local site.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are presenting to hospital with symptoms of SARS CoV-2 infection.
  • Patients who go on to develop a positive SARS CoV-2 test.
  • Patients who can give a valid written informed consent.
  • Patients who are motivated to participate in the study.
  • Adult patients aged 18 years - 85 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot give a valid written informed consent.
  • Patients who are not willing or not motivated to participate in the study.
  • Patients with negative SARS CoV-2 tests.
  • Patients with nasal pathologies like severe deviated nasal septum, nasal masses, head trauma or previously known chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps or on medication for more than 6 months/year for at least one year for chronic rhinosinusitis.
  • Patients with any diagnosed neurological disease known to affect olfactory function will be excluded from the study.
  • Patients unable to read in the English language.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UPSIT scores
Time Frame: At time of diagnosis (+1 week ) post COVID 19 diagnosis or at time of recruitment into study
I. Primary endpoint is olfactory function assessed using the UPSIT and classified as Anosmia; Mild, moderate, and severe microsomia. assessed at the time COVID-19 diagnosis (+1 week) or at the time of registration for in hospital patients
At time of diagnosis (+1 week ) post COVID 19 diagnosis or at time of recruitment into study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UPSIT scores
Time Frame: at day 0, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month and 12 month
I. The changes in olfaction in patients with SARS CoV-2 infection over an initial 12 month period (at day 0, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month and 12 month) using the UPSIT.
at day 0, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month and 12 month
eQOD scores
Time Frame: at day 0, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month and 12 month
Quality of Life using the validated Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders for English speakers (eQOD)
at day 0, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month and 12 month
SNOT 22 scores
Time Frame: at day 0, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month and 12 month
Quality of Life using the validated SinoNasal Outcome Tool-22 (SNOT-22)
at day 0, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month and 12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Subscribe