Aerobic Exercise is Cardio-protective in Hemato-oncological Disease and New-onset Chemotherapy (AEROHEMONCO)

December 4, 2024 updated by: Lucía Florio

Aerobic Physical Exercise is Cardio-protective in Subjects With Hemato-oncological Disease and New-onset Chemotherapy

Oncological diseases are the main cause of death in developed countries and also in Uruguay. Advances in therapeutics have made possible to aspire to cure and in other cases long-term remission with a significant increase in survival and the transformation of cancer into a chronic disease. Chemotherapy treatments have some side effects and cardiotoxicity is well known within them. Heart failure (HF) is a progressive pathology, with high mortality and high resource requirements of the health system with a prognosis that may be worse than some types of cancers. The treatment of established systolic dysfunction and symptomatic HF is mainly based on the indication of inhibitors of the angiotensin-converting enzyme and beta-blockers among other pharmaceutical and no pharmaceutical interventions. Aerobic physical exercise, as a therapeutic intervention, reverses the physiopathological changes that are presumed to lead to HF in sedentary people and it is known, it is feasible to execute an exercise program in cancer patients. However, effective treatments for the primary prevention of systolic dysfunction are not well known. Our hypothesis is that an aerobic physical exercise program for at least 3 months, in subjects with lymphoma and new-onset chemotherapy, is effective in preventing left ventricular systolic dysfunction, at the end of chemotherapy and at one year. For this, the investigators propose a randomized, controlled, clinical study which is blind both for the patient and the evaluating physician, comparing the difference of global longitudinal strain (an echocardiographic result of myocardial function) pre-chemotherapy minus end of chemotherapy and minus one year after, between the active group (aerobic program) and the control group (flexibility program).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis: an aerobic physical exercise program for at least 3 months, in subjects with hemato-oncological diseases that initiate chemotherapy, is effective in preventing systolic dysfunction of the left ventricle at the end of chemotherapy and one year.

It is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Blinded for the subject, evaluating echocardiographic, and treating hematologist.

Blocked randomization method stratified by sex: the randomization sequence will be software generated and centralized by an investigator independent from assistant physicians and echocardiographic evaluator.

To calculate N sample the investigators took a 15% variation of longitudinal left ventricular strain ( clinically significant criteria). The mean and standard deviation of the healthy Uruguayan population was taken from an own study (19.6 ± 1.7%); considering alpha error 0.05 and power 80%, a sample of 16 in each group is required to find significant results. An additional 20% was added for possible "drop outs" resulting in a sample size of 19 subjects/group (N total 38).

The intervention is a 3 months aerobic exercise program compared with a 3 months flexibility exercise program.

The main outcome is the myocardial longitudinal strain variation. Secondary outcomes are related to systolic and diastolic cardiac function, quality of life, cardiac and oncological outcomes, and evaluation of adherence.

Statistical analysis: Qualitative variables will be expressed in absolute and relative frequency. Continuous variables will be resumed as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile interval regarding normal distribution. Parametric or non- parametric tests of the association will be used regarding test of normality of each continuous outcome and Chi-squared test for the association of qualitative variables. Survival analysis will be made with Kaplan Meier curves and long rank test.

The project is registered in Uruguayan interventional trial registration (Ministery of Public Health) with the number 812559.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montevideo, Uruguay, 11600
        • Centro Cardiovascular Universitario-Hospital de Clínicas -FMED- UdelaR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18 and 75 years old
  • New-onset chemotherapy
  • Lymphoma (Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or contraindication to moderate physical activity due to orthopedic cause or general disease (excluding oncological).
  • Hemato-oncological pathology different from lymphomas.
  • Lymphomas not treated with anthracyclines
  • Non-sinus rhythm.
  • Poor echocardiographic window (inability to assess longitudinal strain in more than 4 segments).
  • Physically active subjects (practice aerobic exercise at least 30 minutes, 3 times / week, 3 previous months).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Aerobic
3 months program, 3 times/week aerobic ambulatory program.
3 times per week, 30 minutes each time. Entrance in heat: 8-10 min of joint mobility and / or the aerobic exercise in the main part at light intensity (OMNI 3-4) Main part: minimum 30 minutes, maximun 60 minutes. Intensity: moderate, guided by Talk Test and effort perception scale 5-6 OMNI. Type: aerobic, cycling or walking at home using a treadmill or exercise bike and / or cycling and walking outdoors according to the patient's possibilities and preferences. Return to calm: 5 min of aerobic physical activity of main part at mild intensity (OMNI 3-4), then static stretching. Pictures with each type of exercise will be offered and detailed explained.
Active Comparator: Flexibility
3 months program, 3 times/week flexibility ambulatory program
Entrance in heat: 10 min of joint mobility. Main part: Minimum 30 minutes. Frequency: 3 times por week Intensity: The patient should be able to slowly stretch the muscle to a position of mild discomfort. Type: Static Stretch Time: 15-30 seconds 2 repetitions of each stretch Number of exercises: 12 . Pictures with each muscle group to exercise will be offered and detailed explained.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in GLS (exercise of flexibility and balance).
Time Frame: 6 months
GLS will be measured as the mean value of all segments pick systolic longitudinal strain expressed in percentage (%). The method will be speckle tracking, with a 4 MHz traducer and ViviIQ General Electric echocardiographer, The difference between GLS pre Chemotherapy minus post-chemotherapy and GLS pre chemotherapy minus a year after.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 1 year
LVEF evaluated through Simpson biplane method, expressed in percentage. The value to compare will be those at the end of chemotherapy and a year after the beginning.
1 year
GLS
Time Frame: 1 year
GLS evaluated through speckle tracking method, expressed in percentage. The value to compare will be those at the end of chemotherapy and a year after the beginning.
1 year
Cardiotoxicity incidense
Time Frame: 1 year
Cardiotoxicity definition: Decline of 10% or more of LVEF (pre chemotherapy value is the reference). Incidence of cardiotoxicity will be compared at the end of chemotherapy and one year after.
1 year
Diastolic function. E/e´index
Time Frame: 1 year
Pick value of E wave (pulse Doppler at the tip of mitral valve, first positive wave) and pick value of e´(mean of basal septal and basal lateral e´ , evaluated with tissue Doppler). The comparison will be done at the end of chemotherapy and 1 year from the beginning.
1 year
Diastolic function. Left atrial GLS
Time Frame: 1 year
Biplane atrial GLS expressed in percentage (%). Method for estimation: speckle tracking. The comparison will be at the end of chemotherapy and 1 year from the beginning.
1 year
Diastolic function. Left atrial volume.
Time Frame: 1 year
Biplane left atrial volume, through longitud-area method, expressed in ml. The comparison will be at the end of chemotherapy and 1 year from the beginning.
1 year
Cardiac injury. Troponin I dosification.
Time Frame: 3 months
Dosification of troponin I value (ng/ml) between groups (data from Day 8 to 11 of third chem cycle)
3 months
Clinical cardiovascular composite outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
Incidence of HF incomes and cardiovascular mortality during the follow-up year between groups. Comparison of survival free of events (Kaplan Meier curve and long rank test).
1 year
Muscle corporal mass
Time Frame: 1 year
Percentage of muscle mass calculated through a bioimpedance balance. Comparison will be made baseline, at 3 months and a year.
1 year
Physical activity. Monthly mean of steps.
Time Frame: 3 months
The monthly average of daily physical activity during the 3 months duration of the exercise program measured by steps of a physical activity wristband.
3 months
Quality of life. Minnesota LIVING WITH HEART FAILURE® Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
Minnesota questionnaire for HF patients: It is comprised of 21 important physical, emotional and socioeconomic ways heart failure can adversely affect a patient's life. The patient marks a 0 (zero) to 5 scale to indicate how much each itemized adverse of heart failure has prevented the patient from living as he or she wanted to live during the past 4 weeks. The questionnaire is simply scored by summation of all 21 responses. The response format ranges from 0 (none or not applicable), to 1(very little) to 5 (very much). The simple sum of the responses that ranges from 0 to 105 is a measurement of heart failure severity as indicated by its adverse effect on the respondent's life during the past month. The MLHFQ scores increase with the adverse impact of heart failure on the respondent's life. Evaluation made at the end of exercise program.
3 months
Quality of life. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)
Time Frame: 3 months
FACT-G (general) questionnaire for oncological patients.General quality of life instrument intended for use with a variety of chronic illness conditions. Originally validated in a general cancer population.Administration: Self Time to complete: 5 minutes. Number of items:27 Domains & categories: 4 Name of categories/domains: Physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Scaling of items: Five-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Evaluation made at the end of exercise program.
3 months
Dysnea
Time Frame: 3 months
PROMIS questionnarie for dysnea severity evaluation.The PROMIS Dyspnea Severity item bank assesses the severity of shortness of breath or difficulty breathing an adult experiences in response to various specific activities. Each activity is rated in terms of degree of dyspnea (no shortness of breath, mildly short of breath, moderately short of breath, severely short of breath) while engaging in the activity over the past 7 days, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of dyspnea. Respondents who indicate that they did not perform an activity in the past 7 days will not produce a score for that item. The bank includes 33 items.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucia Florio, MD MSc, Universidad de la Republica

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiotoxicity

Clinical Trials on Aerobic exercise (experimental)

Subscribe