PhysioFlow to Detect Cardiotoxicity in Chemo (PULSE-ECCho)

PhysioFlow Use in Longterm Screening and Evaluation of Cardiotoxicity in Chemotherapy

PULSE-ECCho will focus on trying to detect cardiotoxicity in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy early on in order to avoid irreversible damage. In addition to that, we will test if the PhysioFlow is non-inferior to the conventional MUGA scan.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Our objective is to compare the PhysioFlow to the MUGA scan and see if the results are statistically the same using both techniques. This is what is known as a non-inferior study. The advantage of PhysioFlow is that it is non-invasive, fast and it is done at the bedside or while the patient is receiving his or her chemotherapy.

The patient will be tested with the MUGA scan, as per the standard of care, before chemotherapy is initiated and at every 3 months. The patient will also be tested with the PhysioFlow at the same dates of the MUGA scan. In addition to that, the patients will be tested at each chemotherapy cycle with the PhysioFlow.

Should the PhysioFlow indicate the patient has a cardiac toxicity as the patient is receiving chemotherapy, the results will be confirmed with the MUGA scan.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, h3a 1a1
        • Not yet recruiting
        • McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Ralph Maroun
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nathaniel Bouganim, M.D.
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, h4a 1v3
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Victoria Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nathaniel Bouganim, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients presenting to the oncology day clinic at Royal Victoria hospital and receiving chemotherapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age above 18 years old
  2. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer
  3. ECOG 0 to 2
  4. Provide written consent after the investigational nature, study design, risks and benefits of the study have been explained
  5. Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements

Control Group

  1. Age above 18 years old
  2. No previous history of cancer
  3. ECOG 0 to 2
  4. Did not receive chemotherapeutic agents (even if outside the context of cancer)
  5. Provide written consent after the investigational nature, study design, risks and benefits of the study have been explained
  6. Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age less than 18 years
  2. ECOG 3-4
  3. Suspected or proven severe aortic insufficiency
  4. Patient under cardiopulmonary bypass assistance (I.e.: Left ventricular assisting device)
  5. Congenital cardiac deformities ,such as septal defects
  6. Refuse to comply with the specified visit schedules and requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
comparing the change in ejection fraction measured by physioflow and MUGA scan
Time Frame: at initial diagnosis and after 3 month
at initial diagnosis and after 3 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
acceptance score on the five-point Likert Scale to measure tolerability
Time Frame: up to 24 hrs
At the end of physioflow and or MUGA scan, a questionnaire to assess acceptance was proposed to all patients. The following aspects were evaluated: preparation and information before the imaging examination, degree of preceding concern, comfort, helplessness during the examination, pain experienced, degree of overall satisfaction. Evaluation was performed with a five-point qualitative Likert scale: very low, low, moderate, high, very high
up to 24 hrs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nathaniel Bouganim, MD, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chemotherapy, Cancer, Cardiotoxicity, Physioflow

3
Subscribe