Customized Neuro-Imaging Referenced Symptom Video for the Reduction of Patient and Caregiver Anxiety Around Radiation Treatment for Brain Tumors

December 7, 2023 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Novel Intervention to Reduce Patient and Caregiver Anxiety Around Radiation Treatment for Brain Tumors With a Customized Neuro-Imaging Referenced Symptom Video

This trial studies whether a customized video intervention can help to reduce anxiety in brain cancer patients undergoing radiation treatment and their caregivers. A customized neuro-imaging referenced symptom video that describes symptoms and side effects specific to the patients' tumor may result in an early and sustained reduction in anxiety and distress during and after radiation treatment, thereby improving quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine if provision of a neuro-imaging referenced symptom (NIRS) video intervention for patients starting radiotherapy for newly diagnosed primary brain tumors reduces patient anxiety during radiation compared to standard of care information.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if provision of a NIRS video intervention for patients starting radiotherapy for newly diagnosed primary brain tumors reduces caregiver anxiety during radiation compared to standard of care information.

II. To determine if any changes in patient or caregiver anxiety early during radiation are sustained after the completion of radiation.

III. To investigate whether changes in anxiety are associated with changes in quality of life and distress in patients.

IV. To investigate whether patients perceive the NIRS intervention to have been helpful in understanding possible tumor and treatment symptoms.

OUTLINE: Patients and their caregivers are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I (NIRS VIDEO): Patients receive standard of care verbal and written education materials. Patients also receive a customized NIRS video which includes a description of each their tumor, functional areas of the brain affected, and possible symptoms from the tumor and radiation treatment based on the neuro-imaging features. Patients and their caregivers watch the video together or separately over 1.5-3 minutes before the end of the first week of radiation treatment. Within 2 weeks after watching the NIRS video, patients complete an optional survey over 5-10 minutes.

ARM II (STANDARD OF CARE EDUCATION): Patients receive standard of care verbal and written education materials.

After completion of radiation treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
          • Caroline Chung
          • Phone Number: 713-563-2300
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Caroline Chung

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENT ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Adult patients with newly diagnosed glioma (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 2-4) who are planned for a 6-week course of radiotherapy after surgery
  • PATIENT ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Able to complete questionnaires in English
  • PATIENT ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Has a post-operative diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain with and without contrast acquired within 4 weeks of the start of radiotherapy
  • CAREGIVER ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Adult caregiver (>= 18 years) who is accompanying an eligible patient consented to the study
  • CAREGIVER ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The patient who the caregiver is accompanying is consented for participation on the study
  • CAREGIVER ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Able and willing to complete questionnaires in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENT ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Significant cognitive or psychiatric symptoms that prevent the ability to complete the questionnaires as determined by the assessing staff in the pre-intervention evaluation
  • PATIENT ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Poor performance status (Karnofsky performance status [KPS] < 60) that prevent the ability to complete the questionnaires
  • CAREGIVER ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Significant cognitive or psychiatric symptoms that prevent the ability to complete the questionnaires as determined by the assessing staff in the pre-intervention evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (NIRS)
Patients receive standard of care verbal and written education materials. Patients also receive a customized video which includes a description of each of their tumor, functional areas of the brain affected, and possible symptoms from the tumor and radiation treatment based on the neuro-imaging features. Patients and their caregivers watch the video together or separately over 1.5-3 minutes before the end of the first week of radiation treatment. Within 2 weeks after watching the NIRS video, patients complete an optional survey over 5-10 minutes.
Ancillary studies
Receive standard of care verbal and written education materials
Other Names:
  • Education for Intervention
  • Intervention by Education
  • Intervention through Education
  • Intervention, Educational
Complete optional survey
Watch NIRS video
Active Comparator: Arm II (standard of care)
Patients receive standard of care verbal and written education materials.
Ancillary studies
Receive standard of care verbal and written education materials
Other Names:
  • Education for Intervention
  • Intervention by Education
  • Intervention through Education
  • Intervention, Educational

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in patient S-Anxiety subscale score of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 1 month post-radiation therapy (RT)
Using linear mixed models (LMMs) to evaluate the change in STAI between and within groups. The correlation structure over time will be selected using the Bayesian information criterion. Will calculate correlations between reduction in anxiety and improvement in quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale-Brain [FACT- Br]) and distress (Distress Thermometer). Analysis will focus on the between-group comparison of the changes of the patient S-Anxiety subscale score of the STAI from baseline to 2 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks in to RT. All tests conducted will use a two-sided 0.05 significance level, without adjusting for multiple testing.
From baseline to 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 1 month post-radiation therapy (RT)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in caregiver S-Anxiety subscale score of the STAI and Distress Thermometer score
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 and 6 weeks
Analysis will focus on the between-group comparison of the changes of the caregiver S-Anxiety subscale score of the STAI from baseline to 2 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks in to RT. All tests conducted will use a two-sided .05 significance level, without adjusting for multiple testing.
From baseline to 2 and 6 weeks
Change in patient and caregiver S-Anxiety subscale score of the STAI and Distress Thermometer scores
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 month post-RT
Analysis will be performed by testing for the effects of time, in particular, differences between the average of weeks 2 and 6 during RT and 1 month after RT. All tests conducted will use a two-sided .05 significance level, without adjusting for multiple testing.
From baseline to 1 month post-RT
Changes in patient Distress Thermometer score and FACT-Br score
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 month post-RT
Evaluates the impact between distress and overall quality of life in patients. LMMs will be used to assess the correlations between change in anxiety and change in quality of life, etc., without including time as an independent variable, yet with within-subject correlations still accounted for. For each fixed time point, simple correlations will also be calculated. All tests conducted will use a two-sided .05 significance level, without adjusting for multiple testing.
From baseline to 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 month post-RT
Patient survey
Time Frame: Up to 1 month post-RT
Evaluates whether neuro-imaging referenced symptom intervention was subjectively helpful in understanding their tumor and treatment symptoms and alleviating their anxiety. Relevant summary statistics will be computed. All tests conducted will use a two-sided .05 significance level, without adjusting for multiple testing.
Up to 1 month post-RT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Caroline Chung, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 2, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 2, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-0097 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2020-03698 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioblastoma

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

3
Subscribe