COgnitive Intervention to Restore Attention Using Nature Environment (CORE)

April 15, 2024 updated by: Miyeon Jung, Indiana University

A Virtual Reality Intervention to Improve Attention in Heart Failure Patients

Heart failure is a prevalent and serious public health concern with the growing aging population. Patients with heart failure often experience attention impairment that decreases their ability to perform self-care and diminishes their health-related quality of life. In past studies, 15 - 27% of heart failure patients had attention impairment. Attention is fundamental to human activities including self-care management of heart failure. However, cognitive interventions focusing on attention are scarce in heart failure literature. This study focuses on developing a novel cognitive intervention specifically targeting improved attention and testing its efficacy on improving attention, self-care, and health-related quality of life.

The investigators in this study are asking the following 3 questions: 1) does the newly developed cognitive intervention using immersive virtual reality technology (Nature-VR) improve attention compared with the control condition (Urban-VR)?; 2) does Nature-VR intervention improve HF self-care and health-related quality of life compared with Urban-VR control condition?; and 3) are selected biological factors associated with attention function in HF?

The virtual reality-based cognitive intervention (Nature-VR) can be an efficacious intervention for the patients to use and enjoy without burdening already reduced attention. This study has great potential to improve attention and prevent attention impairment, thereby leading to healthier lives among heart failure patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent serious chronic illness that affects 6.5 million American. Among HF patients, prevalence of attention impairment is reported as 15-27%. Attention is fundamental to human activities including HF self-care. However, cognitive interventions focusing on attention are scarce in HF. The investigators developed a new cognitive intervention with immersive virtual reality technology and created a prototype of the virtual reality-based natural restorative environment intervention (Nature-VR). The prototype was feasible and showed larger effects in improving attention among 10 HF patients.

In this 2-group randomized controlled pilot study, specific aims are to: 1) examine preliminary efficacy of Nature-VR compared with Urban-VR on improving attention; 2) examine preliminary efficacy of Nature-VR compared with Urban-VR on HF self-care and health-related quality of life; and 3) explore possible biomarkers of attention in HF. This study is important and novel because this is the first intervention study targeting attention using virtual reality technology and investigating possible biomarkers associated with attention in HF patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University School of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults (> 21 years)
  • diagnosed with chronic HF Stage C
  • able to communicate in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncorrected visual impairment
  • major neurological disease (e.g., Alzheimer disease, Parkinson's disease)
  • major psychiatric disease (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disease)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nature-VR
Viewing 3D pictures of natural environments
Viewing 360 degree nature pictures delivered by a virtual reality headset for 10 minutes/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (total of 200 minutes).
Active Comparator: Urban-VR
Viewing 3D pictures of urban environments
Viewing 360 degree urban pictures delivered by a virtual reality headset for 10 minutes/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (total of 200 minutes).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in attention - Multi-Source Interference Task
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
Performances on the computerized cognitive test of Multi-Source Interference Task will be examined in terms of speed and accuracy. Participants are instructed to identify the target number, which is different than the other 3 numbers provided on the computer screen. There are two types of trials, congruent and incongruent. Congruent trials have a target number that is always matched its position on the button (e.g., 100, 020, or 223), in contrast, incongruent trials have the target number that is never matched with it position in the button (e.g., 010, 233, or 232). Faster response time and lower error rates indicate better attention.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
Changes in attention - Digit Span Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
Participants are instructed to remember the sequence of numbers the data collector told and repeat the numbers right after the instructor finished talking. This test has 2 subsets, Forward-repeat exactly the same sequence, and Backward-repeat the numbers in the backward from last to the first. More digits correctly repeated indicate better attention.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
Changes in attention - Trail Making Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
This traditional cognitive test of attention is a paper-pencil based measure and has 2 parts. Part A requires participants to connect a series of randomly arrayed, distinct circles numbered 1 to 25 in correct order as quickly as possible. Part B requires participants to connect a series of 25 circles numbered 1 to 13 randomly intermixed with letters from A to L, alternating between numbers and letters, and proceeding in ascending order (e.g., 1-A-2-B-3 and so on). Faster response time in seconds indicates better attention.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
Changes in attention - Stroop Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
Stroop Test is a color-word test measuring the ability to processe different visual features and ignore distractions. The test has 2 parts of reading letters of color names and colors of color names using 4 color names (i.e., red, blue, yellow, and green). Congruent trials have the same letters and colors of the color names (i.e., red in red color). Incongruent trials have different letters and colors of the color names (i.e., red in blue color). Faster response time and lower error rates indicate better attention.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
Changes in attention - Attentional Function Index
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
This self-reported questionnaire has 13 items on 0 to 10 response scales asking effectiveness in behaviors requiring attention. Higher scores indicate better subjective attention
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
This self-reported questionnaire consists of 29 items divided into 3 scales measuring self-care maintenance, symptom perception, and self-care management. In addition, self-care confidence is measured by additional 10 items. Each scale is scored separately and standardized to achieve a possible score of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better self-care of HF.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
Changes in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire will be used to measure health-related quality of life. This self-report questionnaire consists of 21 items on which patients are asked to rate how their HF condition impacted their physical and emotional health. Lower scores indicate better HRQL.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels (serum BDNF)
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Venipuncture will be performed to draw the blood by following Indiana University general laboratory safety guidelines. Changes in the serum BDNF levels (ng/ml) and its associations with attention will be examined.
Baseline and 4 weeks
BDNF gene
Time Frame: Baseline
Venupucture will be performed to draw the blood for the possible genetic biomarker. The frequency of BDNF Val66Met genotype (e.g., rs6265) will be examined and attention will be examined by the genotype.
Baseline
Apolipoprotein (APOE) gene
Time Frame: Baseline
Venupucture will be performed to draw the blood for the possible genetic biomarker. The 3 common allele of APOE (i.e., e2, e3, and e4) will be examined. The frequency of APOE genotypes (e.g., rs7412, rs429358) will be examined and attention will be examined by the genotype.
Baseline
Dopamine receptor gene
Time Frame: Baseline
Venupucture will be performed to draw the blood for the possible genetic biomarker. Specifically, dopamine receptor gene 4 (e.g., 48 bp VNTR) polymorphism and its association with attention will be examined.
Baseline
Dopamine transporter gene
Time Frame: Baseline
Venupucture will be performed to draw the blood for the possible genetic biomarker. The dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) (e.g., rs28363170 - 40 bp VNTR) polymorphism and its association with attention will be examined.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Nature-VR

Subscribe