Family Telehealth Project for Foster Care Youth

November 15, 2023 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Leveraging Technology to Improve Family Relationships for Adolescents in Out-of-Home Placement

The purpose of this research is to adapt and evaluate the efficacy of an existing family based intervention to be delivered via telehealth to child welfare-involved (CWI) youth and their caregiver of origin.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this study is to adapt and evaluate the efficacy of an existing empirically supported, family-based affect management intervention to be delivered via telehealth. There are two versions of this intervention: 1) a dyadic version to be delivered to CWI youth and their caregiver of origin, and 2) a caregiver-only version to be delivered to any caregiver (including kinship caregivers) of a CWI youth. The study involves iteratively adapting the intervention with feedback from youth and caregiver participants and stakeholder partners, as well as evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94131
        • Recruiting
        • UCSF Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Eligible youth:

  • Will be between the ages of 12 and 18 years
  • Will have ongoing child welfare involvement
  • Will be proficient in English
  • Will have no cognitive impairment which would preclude provision of informed assent

Eligible caregivers for dyadic version:

  • Will be the caregiver of origin for the enrolled youth
  • Will be proficient in English or Spanish
  • Will be cognitively capable of providing informed consent for themselves and their youth

Eligible caregivers for caregiver-only version:

  • Will be the caregiver of a youth, between the ages of 12 and 18 years, with ongoing child welfare involvement
  • Will be proficient in English or Spanish
  • Will have no cognitive impairment which would preclude provision of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Caregivers whose rights were terminated due to substantiated abuse or neglect.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Family-based Telehealth Treatment
A family-based telehealth intervention.

The Family Telehealth intervention focuses on improving parent-child relationships and communication.

For the dyadic version, the intervention involves eleven hours of intervention material; it includes motivational interviews, individual and joint sessions co-led by two separate clinicians. The sessions will be delivered on a weekly basis.

For the caregiver-only version, the intervention involves six hours of intervention material; it includes a motivational interview and individual sessions led by a single clinician. The sessions will be delivered on a weekly basis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To measure caregiver and youth affect management skills. Scores range from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater problems with emotion regulation.
Immediately after the intervention.
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To measure caregiver and youth affect management skills. Scores range from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater problems with emotion regulation.
Three months post-intervention.
Parent-adolescent General Communication Scale (PPAC)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To measure caregiver-youth communication. The PPAC measures both positive and negative communication. Scores for positive communication ranging from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating more positive communication. Scores for negative communication range from 13 to 65, with higher scores indicating more negative communication.
Immediately after the intervention.
Parent-adolescent General Communication Scale
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To measure caregiver-youth communication. The PPAC measures both positive and negative communication. Scores for positive communication ranging from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating more positive communication. Scores for negative communication range from 13 to 65, with higher scores indicating more negative communication.
Three months post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Telehealth Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To measure attitudes about the delivery of the intervention via telehealth.
Immediately after the intervention.
Family telehealth feedback form
Time Frame: Two weeks post-baseline.
To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
Two weeks post-baseline.
Family telehealth feedback form
Time Frame: Three weeks post-baseline.
To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
Three weeks post-baseline.
Family telehealth feedback form
Time Frame: Four weeks post-baseline.
To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
Four weeks post-baseline.
Family telehealth feedback form
Time Frame: Five weeks post-baseline.
To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
Five weeks post-baseline.
Family telehealth feedback form
Time Frame: Nine weeks post-baseline.
To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
Nine weeks post-baseline.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Family Assessment Device
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
To measure general family functioning, affective responsiveness, and affective involvement. Scores range from 1 to 4 for each of the scales, with higher scores reflecting unhealthy family functioning.
Immediately after the intervention
Family Assessment Device
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To measure general family functioning, affective responsiveness, and affective involvement. Scores range from 1 to 4 for each of the scales, with higher scores reflecting unhealthy family functioning.
Three months post-intervention.
Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To measure caregiver-youth relationship quality and caregiver parenting stress. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale, with raw scores then categorized as within normal limits, borderline, clinically significant, or clinically severe.
Immediately after the intervention.
Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To measure caregiver-youth relationship quality and caregiver parenting stress. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale, with raw scores then categorized as within normal limits, borderline, clinically significant, or clinically severe.
Three months post-intervention.
Pediatric Symptom Checklist
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To measure youth psychiatric symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 70, with scores of 30 or higher indicating psychological impairment.
Immediately after the intervention.
Pediatric Symptom Checklist
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To measure youth psychiatric symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 70, with scores of 30 or higher indicating psychological impairment.
Three months post-intervention.
Homelessness Asset and Risk Screening Tool
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To measure risk for homelessness and residential stability.
Immediately after the intervention.
Homelessness Asset and Risk Screening Tool
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To measure risk for homelessness and residential stability.
Three months post-intervention.
Adolescent Risk Behavior Assessment
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To measure youth substance use and youth sexual risk behavior.
Immediately after the intervention.
Adolescent Risk Behavior Assessment
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To measure youth substance use and youth sexual risk behavior.
Three months post-intervention.
National Stressful Events Survey PTSD Short Scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To assess the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder in youth. The item are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater severity of acute stress disorder.
Immediately after the intervention.
National Stressful Events Survey PTSD Short Scale
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To assess the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder in youth. The item are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater severity of acute stress disorder.
Three months post-intervention.
Texas Christian University Drug Screen 5 - Opioid Supplement
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To measure youth substance use.
Immediately after the intervention.
Texas Christian University Drug Screen 5 - Opioid Supplement
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To measure youth substance use.
Three months post-intervention.
Asian American Family Conflict Scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To assess caregiver perceptions of intergenerational acculturation conflict. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater family conflict.
Immediately after the intervention.
Asian American Family Conflict Scale
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To assess caregiver perceptions of intergenerational acculturation conflict. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater family conflict.
Three months post-intervention.
DSM-5 Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
To assess caregiver mental health domains that are important across psychiatric diagnoses. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). The score on each item within a domain should be reviewed. A rating of mild (i.e., 2) or greater on any item within a domain (except for substance use, suicidal ideation, and psychosis) and a rating of slight (i.e., 1) or greater on any item within a substance use, suicidal ideation, or psychosis domain may serve as a guide for additional inquiry and follow up to determine if a more detailed assessment for that domain is necessary.
Immediately after the intervention.
DSM-5 Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
To assess caregiver mental health domains that are important across psychiatric diagnoses. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). The score on each item within a domain should be reviewed. A rating of mild (i.e., 2) or greater on any item within a domain (except for substance use, suicidal ideation, and psychosis) and a rating of slight (i.e., 1) or greater on any item within a substance use, suicidal ideation, or psychosis domain may serve as a guide for additional inquiry and follow up to determine if a more detailed assessment for that domain is necessary.
Three months post-intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marina Tolou-Shams, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Communication

Clinical Trials on Family-based Telehealth Intervention

3
Subscribe