Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs. High-flow Nasal Cannula in Moderate-to-severe Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (HENIVOTpilot)

Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs. High-flow Nasal Cannula in Moderate-to-severe Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: an Open Label, Pilot, Randomized Trial

Helmet noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula are novel tools for the first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Compared to face-mask noninvasive ventilation in randomized trials, both have improved clinical outcome of patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure.

As compared to high-flow nasal cannula, helmet noninvasive ventilation improves oxygenation, reduces inspiratory effort, respiratory rate and dyspnea. Whether these physiological benefits are translated into improved outcome remains to be established.

The investigators designed a randomized trial to establish whether first line treatment with Helmet noninvasive ventilation is capable of increasing the number of 28-day respiratory-support-free days, as compared to high-flow nasal cannula in patients with moderate-to-severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy
        • Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna
      • Chieti, Italy
        • SS. Annunziata Hospital, Gabriele d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara
      • Ferrara, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Arcispedale Sant'Anna, University of Ferrara
      • Rimini, Italy
        • Infermi Hospital
      • Rome, Italy
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitaro A. Gemelli IRCCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Acute-onset respiratory distress or flue-related symptoms Moderate-to-severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2<=200 mmHg) PaCO2<45 mmHg pH>7.30

Exclusion Criteria:

Need for urgent endo-tracheal intubation Exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Documented pneumothorax Clinical diagnosis of Cardiogenic pulmonary oedema Do-not-intubate order Altered neurological status that requires immediate intubation and/or making the patient uncooperative Thoracic or abdominal surgery in the previous 7 days Recent head surgery or anatomy that prevent the application of helmet or Optiflow to patient's face

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: High-flow nasal cannula

High-flow nasal cannula will be delivered with the Optiflow system. Initial set flow will be ≥ 50 /min and flows will be decreased in case of intolerance and/or according to patients' requirements: flows≥30 L/min will be mandatory in all enrolled patients. Humidification chamber (MR860, Fisher and Paykel healthcare, New Zealand) will be set at 37 °C or 34 °C according to patient's comfort. FiO2 will be titrated to obtain an SpO2≥92% and ≤98%.

The treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge. Weaning from high-flow will be considered as standardized criteria are met.

In both arms, the treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge.

Patients will have to undergo the allocated treatment within 1 hour from the moment of randomization and within 24 hours from admission in the intensive care unit

Experimental: Helmet noninvasive ventilation

Patients will receive continuous helmet pressure support ventilation for at least 16 hours/day the first 2 calendar days. Continuous noninvasive ventilation without interruptions will be strongly encouraged in the first 24 hours of treatment. The ventilator will be set in pressure support mode. Use of continuous positive airway pressure by flow generators and Venturi systems instead of pressure support ventilation will be allowed in case of shortage of ventilators. Maintenance of positive end-expiratory pressure ≥ 8-10 during the treatment is mandatory.

After weaning and during any interruption from noninvasive ventilation, patients will undergo low-flow or high-flow oxygen, according to the decision of the attending physician.

The treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge.

In both arms, the treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge.

Patients will have to undergo the allocated treatment within 1 hour from the moment of randomization and within 24 hours from admission in the intensive care unit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory-support free days within 28 days from randomization
Time Frame: 28 days
The number of days in which patients did not receive any form of respiratory support (i.e. high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation)
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endotracheal intubation
Time Frame: 28 days
The proportion of patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the two groups. The need for endotracheal intubation will be established with predefined criteria, which will be evaluated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee
28 days
Invasive ventilation-free days within 28 days from randomization
Time Frame: 28 days
The number of days in which patients did not receive invasive mechanical ventilation
28 days
Invasive ventilation-free days within 60 days from randomization
Time Frame: 60 days
The number of days in which patients did not receive invasive mechanical ventilation
60 days
Oxygenation
Time Frame: 28 days
The ratio of PaO2 to FiO2 will be measured 1, 6, 12, 24 hours after randomization and then once daily up to intensive care unit discharge
28 days
Carbon dioxide
Time Frame: 28 days
PaCO2 will be measured 1, 6, 12, 24 hours after randomization and then once daily up to intensive care unit discharge
28 days
Dyspnea
Time Frame: 28 days
Dyspnea will be evaluated through a visual analog scale (0-10, where 10 represents the most sever symptom) will be measured 1, 6, 12, 24 hours after randomization and then once daily up to intensive care unit discharge
28 days
Respiratory rate
Time Frame: 28 days
Respiratory rate will be measured 1, 6, 12, 24 hours after randomization and then once daily up to intensive care unit discharge
28 days
In-intensive care unit mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
Clinical outcome (dead/alive) at intensive care unit discharge
90 days
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
Clinical outcome (dead/alive) at hospital discharge
90 days
90-day mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
Clinical outcome (dead/alive) at 90 days after randomization
90 days
Quality of life after recovery
Time Frame: 1 year
Quality of life in survivors, assessed by Short Form-36 questionnaire
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Massimo Antonelli, MD, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS
  • Principal Investigator: Domenico Luca Grieco, MD, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Data will be made available upon a reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia

Clinical Trials on Noninvasive respiratory support

3
Subscribe