The Person-centered Evolution of Radiotherapy Services in Ontario Study (PERSON)

March 3, 2026 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

The Person-centered Evolution of Radiotherapy Services in Ontario (PERSON) Study

This is a single center, prospective, investigator initiated, randomized controlled study of patients with breast cancer who will be receiving radiation therapy as per SOC. Patients will be randomized in either the person-centered model-of-care versus the standard model of care.

Patients randomized to the person-centered model-of-care will have a 30 minute education session with a radiation therapist in addition to RT SOC procedures. Patients randomized to the standard model of care will be treated as per SOC. Questionnaires will be administered to both arms at baseline, and at the first and last day of treatment. In addition to the main study, patients will have the option to participate in a semi-structured one on one interview upon completion of their radiotherapy course.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Radiation therapy plays an integral role in the definitive treatment of breast cancer by reducing the risk of locoregional recurrence and improving patient outcomes. Despite the availability of supportive care services, many patients have unmet needs which may lead to unexpected negative outcomes. Anxiety can affect patients' ability to cope, interfere with treatment and self-manage their own care. Strategies to improve cancer care include patient navigators or case managers, early interventions and self-management of side effects to reduce treatment-related toxicities. Therefore, minimizing distress from treatment and engaging patients by personalizing care according to their unique needs will optimize use of supportive care services and improve clinical outcomes.

A Cochrane review demonstrated that information and supportive care sessions delivered by non-physician healthcare providers improves both emotional wellbeing and quality of life in breast cancer patients. A prospective randomized, Australian study by Halkett et al. demonstrated that an education intervention delivered one-on-one by Radiation Therapists effectively reduces breast cancer patients' psychological distress and improves preparedness for treatment. This highlights the importance of early and accessible education resources where patients experience direct access to the radiation therapy team.

Further research is required to investigate the efficacy of person-centered model on patient experiences and relevant clinical outcomes. Specifically, it is expected this model will reduce patient anxiety, improve preparedness for radiation therapy through education, and improve patient self-management of radiation-toxicities. The proposed study focuses on patients with breast cancer because of the experience in testing the model on this group and their relatively uniform treatment at all Ontario cancer centres, which will facilitate translation of this model in the future. A randomized controlled study will determine the efficacy of the person-centered model versus standard care, and generate high-quality evidence in an unbiased setting that was not possible in the prior clinical pilot phases.

Personalizing patient experiences in radiotherapy, coupled with improvements in treatment quality and supportive care, may improve clinical outcomes including toxicity and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C1
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer
  • Intended to receive radiation therapy to the breast/chest-wall and regional lymph nodes
  • Ability to communicate in English without assistance of another person
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Commenced any radiation therapy-specific procedures (e.g. education, CT-simulation, etc.)
  • Received a previous course of radiation therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Person-Centered Model-of-Care
Patients randomized to the person-centered model-of-care will have a 30 minute education session with a radiation therapist in addition to the standard of care, radiation therapy procedures.
Quality of Life questionnaires will be administered to both arms at baseline, and at the first and last day of treatment.
Other: Standard Model-of-Care
Patients randomized to the standard model of care will be treated as per standard of care.
Quality of Life questionnaires will be administered to both arms at baseline, and at the first and last day of treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Anxiety Levels
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire
Up to 5 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported self-efficacy
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self Efficacy Survey
Up to 5 weeks.
Patient-reported engagement level
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks.
Patient Health Engagement (PHE) survey
Up to 5 weeks.
Patient-reported experience
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks.
EORTC satisfaction with cancer care core (EORTC PATSAT-C33) questionnaire
Up to 5 weeks.
Patient-reported experience
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks.
Specific complementary outpatient module (EORTC OUT-PATSAT7) questionnaire
Up to 5 weeks.
Patient-reported preparedness for radiation therapy
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks.
Cancer Treatment Survey (CaTS)
Up to 5 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 24, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life Questionnaires

Subscribe