Ataxia-telangiectasia: Treating Mitochondrial Dysfunction With a Novel Form of Anaplerosis (A-TC7)

July 19, 2023 updated by: The University of Queensland

A Phase 2A/2B Placebo-controlled Randomised Clinical Trial to Test the Ability of Triheptanoin to Protect Primary Airway Epithelial Cells Obtained From Participants With Ataxia-telangiectasia Against Death Induced by Glucose Deprivation

Study design: Parallel group, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation each 2 months for 12 months. Dose based on percent (%) of calculated caloric intake. Thirty participants will be randomised in blocks on a 1:1:1 ratio into one of three groups stratified by age (< 5 years, 5-10 years, > 10 years of age). Group 1: 10%, 20%, 35%, 35%, 35% (no placebo). Group 2: placebo, 10%, 20%, 35%, 35% Group 3: placebo, placebo, 10%, 20%, 35%.

Primary endpoint: The percent cell death induced by glucose deprivation in cell culture. Secondary endpoints include: Scales for assessment and rating of ataxia, International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale, Ataxia Telangiectasia Neurological Examination Scale Toolkit, speech and language assessment, EyeSeeCam assessment, MRI lung imaging, Lung function, Upper respiratory microbiome, Faecal microbiome, Survival and inflammatory phenotype of airway epithelial cells, macrophages and in serum, Metabolomic biomarker discovery in serum and measurement of neuroflament light chain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Ataxia Telangiectasia (A-T) is a rare, genetic, progressive, life-limiting, neuro-degenerative condition affecting a variety of body systems resulting in ataxia, immune deficiency, respiratory complications and a predisposition to cancer. Currently there is no cure for A-T. Over the years, a number of small clinical trials using steroids, antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents have had little success. The disease natural history is relentless leading to early death. A-T generates a significant disease burden for the individuals, their extended families and on health care resources. With palliative care being the only current option for families, a treatment trial for A-T meets an unmet need. The investigators preliminary data provide compelling evidence of reversible mitochondrial dysfunction and preventable cell death in A-T patient cells and the beneficial effects of heptanoate (C7), the primary metabolite of triheptanoin. C7 corrects a defect in endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-mitochondrial signalling in A-T cells and has great potential for application in treating participants. C7 has been utilised with efficacy and safety over the last 15 years for inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) such as long chain fatty acid defects (LC-FAOD).

A-T is due to a genetic defect that results in a defective serine/threonine protein kinase, known as ATM. Normally, ATM, plays a central role in protecting the genome against damage. It is increasingly evident that ATM protects cells against oxidative stress. This protein is also present outside the nucleus, where it is activated by oxidative stress through a separate mechanism from DNA damage, providing an explanation why anti-oxidants have a protective role in A-T cells in culture and in animal models. From these and other studies, it is evident that mitochondrial abnormalities characterise ATM and it has been suggested that A-T should be considered, at least in part, as a mitochondrial disease. The Investigators have added substance to that claim by showing that ATM-deficient (B3) cells are exquisitely sensitive to inhibition of glycolysis by glucose deprivation, compared to controls (HBEC). The investigators have also shown this increased sensitivity to nutrient deprivation for primary epithelial cells from patients and in immortalised patient cells. Together these data point to a reduced capacity of A-T mitochondria to support energy metabolism and provide additional evidence for a mitochondrial defect in A-T cells. The investigators have recently demonstrated that this hypersensitivity to glucose deprivation can be explained by a novel mechanism involving defective signalling between the ER and the mitochondrion. The investigators demonstrated that this was caused by defective assembly of the VDAC1-GRP75-IP3R1 calcium channel and less ER-mitochondria contact points as determined by transmission electron microscopy. This in turn resulted in reduced calcium release from the ER and less transfer to mitochondria providing further evidence for mitochondrial dysfunction in A-T cells.

The investigators selected triheptanoin, a highly purified, synthetic medium odd-chain triglyceride that is catabolized to heptanoate and can traverse the mitochondrial membrane without the carnitine carrier. Free heptanoate is then metabolized by the medium chain fatty acid oxidation enzymes to yield both acetyl CoA and propionyl CoA that act as anaplerotics to replenish the TCA cycle and enhance energy metabolism by providing NADPH and generating ATP. The investigators demonstrated that heptanoate partially corrects the extreme sensitivity to glycolysis inhibition in both the ATM-deficient cell line as well as in primary epithelial cells from a patient with A-T. Excitingly, heptanoate also corrected all of the defects in ER-mitochondrial signalling including calcium uptake into mitochondria. Based on the importance of mitochondrial dysfunction in the A-T phenotype and our results revealing correction of mitochondrial function by heptanoate, the investigators consider that triheptanoin has excellent potential in correcting many aspects of the A-T phenotype including the progressive neurodegenerative phenotype.

Triheptanoin has been used for over 15 years to treat LC-FAOD, with demonstrated improvements in cardiac function and reductions in rhabdomyolysis episodes. Triheptanoin and heptanoate are known to protect against cell death in experimental conditions largely characterised by oxidative stress, such as stroke and motor neurone disease, adult polyglucosan body disease, alternating hemiplegia of childhood, Glucose-1 transporter deficiency, and mouse models and humans with epilepsy. Heptanoate protects cultured neurons against H2O2-induced cell death. Collectively these studies demonstrate that triheptanoin is well tolerated and is effective in treating a range of neurological conditions associated with neuronal energy deficiency.

Seamless Phase II to Phase III go/no-go criteria Interim monitoring for the intervention program in the A-T2020/01 trial will occur at the times of the two interim analyses (first, when the study cohort has completed the initial 2 months treatment, and second, after 6 months treatment when Group One has completed 2 months of the 35% dose). A blinded report will be presented to the iDSMB containing pertinent descriptive statistics of the groups, a standard between-group comparison for the primary and secondary outcomes, and a Bayesian estimation of the (posterior) probability that each of the three intervention groups is superior for the primary outcomes. The information to be presented to the iDSMB will be agreed with the iDSMB prior to the first iDSMB meeting, and will be updated at the time of the iDSMB meetings. Data will be presented to the iDSMB in a blind fashion, but the iDSMB can request unblinded data to confirm or ratify any reported interim results. The iDSMB may however make a recommendation about stopping current interventions if they show poor promise or futility.

The primary endpoints for interim iDSMB reports are the percent cell death induced by glucose deprivation in cell culture, and reversal/correction of their abnormal mitochondrial profile in primary epithelial cells resulting in cell death over the treatment period.

Secondary scales clinical neurological assessments assist formulating the go/no-go criteria and will include: SARA and ICARS. SARA is a validated cerebellar ataxia tool, measuring gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger-chase test, finger nose-test, fast alternating movements and heel-shin test. It has eight categories with accumulative score ranging from 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia); Gait (0-8 points), Stance (0-6 points), Sitting (0-4 points), Speech disturbance (0-6 points), Finger chase (0-4 points), Nose-finger test (0-4 points), Fast alternating hand movement (0-4 points), Heel-shin slide (0-4 points). ICARS is a scale recorded out of 100 with 19 items and 4 subscales and has been used in A-T. Disorders rated as subscales within the ICARS are: Postural and gait disturbances, (7 items, 0-34 points) Limb Ataxia (7 items, 0-52 points), Dysarthria (2 items, 0-8 points), and Oculomotor disorders (3 items, 0-6 points). Minimum Score: 0 Maximum score: 100.

go/no-go triggers

go triggers Seamless progress from Phase II to Phase III will be triggered under the following pre-set parameters;

  • If clinically or statistically significant improvement in the primary study outcome is observed in combination with a measured improvement of at least ½ standard deviation in key clinical scales which includes either;
  • significant improvement in total combined scores from the SARA and ICARS scales.
  • And/or significant improvements any aspects of the SARA and ICARS scales individually, especially pertaining to; Postural and gait improvements, Speech disturbance, Improved fine motor skills, Fine motor disturbance, Kinetic functions

No-go triggers Seamless progress from Phase II to Phase III will not occur under the following pre-set parameters;

  • Adverse events
  • If no clinically significant improvement in the primary study outcome is observed
  • If a clinically significant improvement in the primary study outcome occurs without any improvements in key secondary scales specifically the SARA and ICARS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4001
        • Queensland Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of either sex, of any age, with a confirmed diagnosis of A-T,
  • Patients who are able to undertake the study procedures,
  • Families who are able to comply with the protocol for its duration and who provide informed patient assent and consent signed and dated by parent/legal guardian or adult participant according to local regulations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose parents/legal guardians are not able to provide consent
  • Patients who have been in another randomised clinical intervention trial where the use of investigational medicinal product within 3 months or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before study enrolment
  • Taking off label mediations or nutritional supplements that the PI consider would impact participant's safe participation.
  • Patients who are pregnant and/or lactating, planning a pregnancy during the study. Contraception must be used for sexually active male and female participants
  • Intestinal Malabsorption secondary to Pancreatic Insufficiency
  • Liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase [ALT]/aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) or total bilirubin > 2 x the upper limit of normal at the time of screening.
  • Renal insufficiency as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73m2 at the screening visit.
  • Any comorbid medical condition that in the assessment of the PI that would impact participant's safe participation (e.g. active cancer requiring treatment)
  • Evidence of dysphagia that places subject at risk of aspiration if orally fed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group 1: Triheptanoin and no Placebo

Parallel group, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation each 2 months for 12 months. Dose based on percent (%) of calculated caloric intake.

Thirty participants will be randomised in blocks on a 1:1:1 ratio into one of three groups.

Group 1: 10%, 20%, 35%, 35%, 35% (no placebo). Group 2: placebo, 10%, 20%, 35%, 35% Group 3: placebo, placebo, 10%, 20%, 35%

Triheptanoin is a highly purified, synthetic medium odd-chain triglyceride that is catabolized to heptanoate.
Other: Group 2: Placebo and Triheptanoin

Parallel group, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation each 2 months for 12 months. Dose based on percent (%) of calculated caloric intake.

Thirty participants will be randomised in blocks on a 1:1:1 ratio into one of three groups.

Group 1: 10%, 20%, 35%, 35%, 35% (no placebo). Group 2: placebo, 10%, 20%, 35%, 35% Group 3: placebo, placebo, 10%, 20%, 35%

Triheptanoin is a highly purified, synthetic medium odd-chain triglyceride that is catabolized to heptanoate.
Other: Group 3: Placebo, Placebo and Triheptanoin

Parallel group, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation each 2 months for 12 months. Dose based on percent (%) of calculated caloric intake.

Thirty participants will be randomised in blocks on a 1:1:1 ratio into one of three groups.

Group 1: 10%, 20%, 35%, 35%, 35% (no placebo). Group 2: placebo, 10%, 20%, 35%, 35% Group 3: placebo, placebo, 10%, 20%, 35%

Triheptanoin is a highly purified, synthetic medium odd-chain triglyceride that is catabolized to heptanoate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nasal epithelial cell survival under conditions of glucose deprivation.
Time Frame: Day 1, baseline measurement
Submerged epithelial cultures will be established at each visit to the clinic and assays described above carried out within 2 weeks to determine effects of triheptanoin treatment on cell death, mitochondrial function and signalling. The primary outcome variable will be percent cell death induced by glucose deprivation in cell culture.
Day 1, baseline measurement
Nasal epithelial cell survival under conditions of glucose deprivation.
Time Frame: Day 60, assessment of effects/changes from Day 1 baseline measurement
Submerged epithelial cultures will be established at each visit to the clinic and assays described above carried out within 2 weeks to determine effects of triheptanoin treatment on cell death, mitochondrial function and signalling. The primary outcome variable will be percent cell death induced by glucose deprivation in cell culture.
Day 60, assessment of effects/changes from Day 1 baseline measurement
Nasal epithelial cell survival under conditions of glucose deprivation.
Time Frame: Day 120, assessment of effects/changes from Day 60 baseline measurement
Submerged epithelial cultures will be established at each visit to the clinic and assays described above carried out within 2 weeks to determine effects of triheptanoin treatment on cell death, mitochondrial function and signalling. The primary outcome variable will be percent cell death induced by glucose deprivation in cell culture.
Day 120, assessment of effects/changes from Day 60 baseline measurement
Nasal epithelial cell survival under conditions of glucose deprivation.
Time Frame: Day 180, assessment of effects/changes from Day 120 baseline measurement
Submerged epithelial cultures will be established at each visit to the clinic and assays described above carried out within 2 weeks to determine effects of triheptanoin treatment on cell death, mitochondrial function and signalling. The primary outcome variable will be percent cell death induced by glucose deprivation in cell culture.
Day 180, assessment of effects/changes from Day 120 baseline measurement
Nasal epithelial cell survival under conditions of glucose deprivation.
Time Frame: Day 240, assessment of effects/changes from Day 180 baseline measurement
Submerged epithelial cultures will be established at each visit to the clinic and assays described above carried out within 2 weeks to determine effects of triheptanoin treatment on cell death, mitochondrial function and signalling. The primary outcome variable will be percent cell death induced by glucose deprivation in cell culture.
Day 240, assessment of effects/changes from Day 180 baseline measurement
Nasal epithelial cell survival under conditions of glucose deprivation.
Time Frame: Day 300, assessment of effects/changes from Day 240 baseline measurement
Submerged epithelial cultures will be established at each visit to the clinic and assays described above carried out within 2 weeks to determine effects of triheptanoin treatment on cell death, mitochondrial function and signalling. The primary outcome variable will be percent cell death induced by glucose deprivation in cell culture.
Day 300, assessment of effects/changes from Day 240 baseline measurement
Nasal epithelial cell survival under conditions of glucose deprivation.
Time Frame: Day 360, assessment of effects/changes from Day 300 baseline measurement
Submerged epithelial cultures will be established at each visit to the clinic and assays described above carried out within 2 weeks to determine effects of triheptanoin treatment on cell death, mitochondrial function and signalling. The primary outcome variable will be percent cell death induced by glucose deprivation in cell culture.
Day 360, assessment of effects/changes from Day 300 baseline measurement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scales for assessment and rating of ataxia
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Scales for assessment and rating of ataxia is a validated cerebellar ataxia tool, measuring gait (scale 0-8), stance (scale 0-6), sitting (scale 0-4), speech (scale 0-6), finger-chase test scale 0-4), finger nose-test (scale 0-4), fast alternating movements (scale 0-4) and heel-shin test (scale 0-4). 0 indicates normal function, escalating numbers in the scale domains indicate increased difficultly with the measured tasks.
Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale is a scale recorded out of 100 with 19 items and 4 sub-scales and has been used in A-T. 0 indicates normal function, escalating numbers in the scale domains indicate increased difficulty with the measured tasks.
Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Speech Pathology Assessments
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Speech perception and intelligibility will be defined using a standardised instrument.
Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Ophthalmology assessments
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
The EyeSeeCam system will acquire calibrated recordings and quantified analysis of eye movements for assessment of saccadic latency, fixation stability, optokinetic nystagmus and vestibulo-ocular reflex response, and ocular coherence tomography scans provide detailed images of retinal nerve fibre layer.
Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
MRI lung imaging
Time Frame: Performed at Day 1 and Day 360 in suitable participants
MRI with ultra-short echo time sequences including Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction with Radial Acquisition and Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination will define lung structure, and diffusion weighted imaging to estimate inflammatory lung changes.
Performed at Day 1 and Day 360 in suitable participants
Spirometry Vital capacity (litres)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Lung function will be measured using conventional spirometry in those able to perform the test.
Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Spirometry Forced vital capacity (litres)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Lung function will be measured using conventional spirometry in those able to perform the test.
Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Spirometry Forced expiratory volume in one second (litres)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Lung function will be measured using conventional spirometry in those able to perform the test.
Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Spirometry Peak expiratory flow (L.min-1)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Lung function will be measured using conventional spirometry in those able to perform the test.
Day 1, Day 120, Day 240, Day 360
Upper respiratory microbiome
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
DNA extraction and sequencing via Qiagen DNA isolation kit then 16S rRNA sequencing16S rRNA sequencing
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Faecal microbiome
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
DNA extraction and sequencing via Qiagen DNA isolation kit then 16S rRNA sequencing16S rRNA sequencing to identify faecal microbial composition. 1D 1H NMR spectroscopy and gas chromatography for short chain fatty acids and other metabolites.
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Intestinal permeability
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Lipopolysaccharide, Lipopolysaccharide binding protein and Zonulin analys by standard ELISA assays.
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival and inflammatory phenotype of airway epithelial cells, macrophages and in serum
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-8 (g/ml) and TNF-α (g/ml) and a decreased level of the inflammasome dependent cytokine IL-β (g/ml) will be assayed in the supernatants of epithelial cell cultures and macrophages and in serum. All will be quantitated via AlphaLISA according to the manufacturers' protocol (Perkin Elmer, MA, USA).
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Serum metabolomic biomarker
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
SWATH-MS based methods to identify candidate small molecule biomarkers in participants validated against an independent study cohort. Small molecules will be enriched from serum by organic solvent precipitation of proteins followed by solid phase extraction and/or filtration.
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Air Displacement Plethysmography
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
The BOD POD is the device used to measure body volume giving reliable and reproducible results to determine fat mass and lean body mass. The BOD POD is quick, safe, non-invasive and able to be used in both the adult and paediatric population
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Quality of Life Measures
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Paediatric Side Effect Questionnaire is a 19-item measure consisting of five sub-scales: cognitive (six items), motor (four items), behavioural (three items), general neurological (four items), and weight (two items) side effects. The investigators will add five items for gastrointestinal side effects to the questionnaire, including gastrointestinal pain, acid reflux, vomiting, diarrhoea, and constipation. The scale will be recorded from 0 to 96. 0 indicates normal function, escalating numbers in the scale domains indicate increased difficultly with the measured task.
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Neurofilament light chain
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Neurofilament light chain will be quantified using the single-molecule (Simoa) array method and the Simoa NF-light assay (Quanterix, MA, US) on an HD-1platform (GBIO).
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Nutritional assessments
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Standardised tool used include, validated diet history tools such as simplified nutritional appetite questionnaire, and weight and height.
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
body mass index in kg/m^2
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
weight (kg) / [height (m)]2
Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Resting energy expenditure
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360

Resting energy expenditure will be calculated using the Harris-Benedict Equations (calories/day):

Male: (66.5 + 13.8 X weight) + (5.0 X height) - (6.8 X age) Female: (665.1 + 9.6 X weight) + (1.8 X height) - (4.7 X age) weight in kilograms, height in centimeters, age in years

Day 1, Day 60, Day 120, Day 180, Day 240, Day 300, Day 360
Seamless Phase II to Phase III go/no-go criteria
Time Frame: Interim independent data safety management committee analysis Day 180 and Day 240
The A-T2020/01 standing platform trial provides a resource to enable a promising therapy for AT to be rapidly evaluated and to facilitate seamless transition from a Phase II to a Phase III study. Initially the platform will support a phase IIA/IIB study, but if the new intervention being evaluated is considered effective then we plan to move seamlessly from this Phase IIA/IIB study to a Phase III. The move to a Phase III trial will be guided by a pre-defined threshold for the probability of a successful intervention during phase III, which will be established in planning the Phase IIA/IIB trial and agreed by regulatory authorities for pivotal studies. If a seamless transition to Phase III is considered feasible, the trial investigators and the trial statistics team will provide the iDSMB and TSC with a Phase III proposal, and if this was approved by the iDSMB and TSC then further recruitment to the target number determined would be undertaken.
Interim independent data safety management committee analysis Day 180 and Day 240

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Coman, MBBS FRACP, Queensland Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ataxia Telangiectasia

Clinical Trials on Triheptanoin

Subscribe