Hysteroscopic Guided Endometrial Sampling: Prospective Comparison Between 5Fr and 7Fr Biopsy Forceps (HYSTEROBIO) (HYSTEROBIO)

August 31, 2020 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Indication for hysteroscopic guided biopsy compared to blind biopsy have been little evaluated. However, this kind of biopsy is usually performed in many centre. They allow exploration of uterine cavity but also to perform guided biopsies on the most suspicious area. However, with 5Fr forceps, biopsy are often too small to conclude.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Blind biopsies using Novak or Cormier cannula had limits. Demirkiran et al conclude on 673 women that histology was similar between biopsies and hysterectomy in only 67% of cases. Others studies conclude thatit is difficult to conclude about focal disease with blind biopsies.

A study compared blind biopsies to biopsy performed under hysteroscopic guidance in women using Tamoxifene and conclude that guided biopsies were more specific (80% versus 68.9%) and a better positive predictive value (68.9% versus 43.7%) for all kind of endometrial pathologies

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

146

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France, 94275
        • AP-HP, Bicêtre Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Woman over 18 year-old with abnormal uterine bleeding (or endometrium thickness over 10mm) and risk factors of endometrial carcinoma, or endometrium thickness over 5mm in a menopausal woman or abnormal uterine bleeding after 45 years old.

    • Woman who speak and understand french
    • Woman who give her written informed consent
    • Woman covered by french medical insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient

    • Patient under guardianship, curators or safeguard of justice.
    • Patient participating in another ongoing study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 5FR + 7FR
Each woman is its own control and had biopsies with the 2 size of forceps. In this group first with 5FR then 7 FR
Endometrial sampling with 2 different forceps
Other: 7FR + 5FR
Each woman is its own control and had biopsies with the 2 size of forceps. In this group first with 7FR then 5FR
Endometrial sampling with 2 different forceps

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate ability to give a pathologic conclusion after 5Fr and 7Fr forceps biopsies
Time Frame: During the pathologist's analysis
Evaluated by the number of cases on witch the biopsy allowed to conclude
During the pathologist's analysis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare histologic conclusions after 5 and 7Fr biopsies
Time Frame: During the pathologist's analysis
Evaluated by Importance of collapse artifacts
During the pathologist's analysis
To compare rate of ability to obtain pathologic conclusion on the sample after 5Fr and 7Fr forceps in endometrial carcinoma
Time Frame: During the pathologist's analysis
The number of endometrial malignancies diagnosed histologically with either forceps
During the pathologist's analysis
To evaluate the rate of hysteroscopic failure due to cervical stenosis
Time Frame: During the pathologist's analysis
The number of cases where hysteroscopy was not possible
During the pathologist's analysis

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Perine CAPMAS, APHP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 20, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP200243
  • 2017-A00621-52 (Other Identifier: IDRCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biopsy

Clinical Trials on Endometrial sampling

3
Subscribe