Validity of a French Version of the Severe Asthma Questionnaire (TRAQUE)

December 14, 2023 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Measurement Properties Validity of the French Traduction of the Severe Asthma Questionnaire: a Prospective Study

"Severe asthma affects only 5% of asthmatics, but has a considerable impact on patients owing to the respiratory disability linked to asthma but also complications from oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy.

Biologics have recently been made available, and improve quality of life (QoL)severe asthma patients. Having a reproducible and reliable measuring tool of QoL for severe asthmatics would be useful for assessing the impact of the various interventions proposed.

QoL questionnaires currently used in respiratory diseases are not specific to severe asthma. They are very focused on respiratory disability, but for example do not take into account the impact of treatments, especially oral steroids.

The Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) is the very first tool specifically designed to assess the health related quality of life of severe asthma population. The development of its use goes through the validation of this questionnaire in its French translation available since September 2019. "

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

"Difficult to treat asthma affects about 17% of the asthma population, among which 5% have severe asthma.

For these patients, the disease is often a burden to their professional, family and personal life, significantly altering their quality of life.

Current recommendations on medical management aim at asthma control and reduction of exacerbations. While there are now biologics that effectively address these objectives, they are still struggling to demonstrate their effectiveness in term of quality of life improvement.

Although in real life, patients well responding to biologics often report ""a changing life"", this is not well demonstrated in clinical trials, which only bring out modest variations in quality of life (mainly AQLQ) and asthma control scores. This may be due to the fact that currently used scores, measure either the quality of life in a generic way, or asthma control (dyspnea, use of rescue treatments) rather than asthma specific quality of life, and do not take into account the burden of oral steroids.

For this specific population of asthmatics, even the dedicated scores (11 scales in the adult population and 6 in the pediatric population) have trouble measuring variations in quality of life. They hardly ever manage to demonstrate a difference in quality of life between mild asthma and severe asthma.

However, just like oral steroids sparing, improving quality of life is of concern for physicians.

The development of Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) instruments follows rigorous scientific methodology. The Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) is a specific instrument for measuring quality of life in severe asthma. It was developed and validated in English by the University of Plymouth in 2018, according to the current recommendations, in an attempt to respond to the lack of specificity of the former quality of life tests.

It has gone through forward and backward translation process into French thanks to the Mappy Trust organization. It seems important to validate, in its French translation, the psychometric properties of the SAQ questionnaire, a specific instrument measuring quality of life for severe asthmatics.

Practical considerations:

  • Useful data cf primary and secondary objectives will be collected at the first and the 6th month.
  • Standard Operating Procedures: Patient recruitment will only take place in Bichat Hospital. Questionnaires and forms will be lend to the severe asthmatics coming to consultation and day hospital thanks to clinical research associate. Data will be anonymized and collected by a clinical research associate (fulfilled forms and questionnaire and medical file). Data management, data analysis will be ensured by Clinical Research Unit of Bichat Hospital.
  • Sample size assessment : estimated on FALISSARD assumption: 320 patients.
  • Plan for missing data: usual way for each quality of life questionnaire, enlarged 6th month visit period to collect 6th month reevaluation.
  • Statistical analysis plan: cf section primary and secondary objectives.
  • Quality assurance plan: Data validation and registry procedures, including any plans for site monitoring and auditing will be ensured by the Clinical Research Unit of Bichat Hospital.
  • Data checks: Predefined rules for range will be pre-configure in the eCase Report Form (CRF) computed in REDCap. The data dictionary that contains detailed descriptions of each variable used by the registry (cf inclusion/exclusion criteria, primary and secondary outcome), including the source of the variable, and normal ranges is described in a specific document based on which the eCRF will be built. "

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

188

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75018
        • Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with severe asthma

Description

Inclusion criteria :

  • Adult patients
  • Patients diagnosed with severe asthma as defined by the international consensus statement from European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society 2014: Asthma which requires treatment for GINA steps 4-5 asthma (high dose Inhaled Cortico Steroids > 1000 micrograms and Long Action Beta Agonist or leukotriene or theophyllin modifier ) for the previous year

    *or systemic CorticoSteroids for 50% of the previous year to prevent it from becoming ''uncontrolled'' or which remains ''uncontrolled'' despite this therapy

  • Patient informed and not opposed to participating

Exclusion criteria :

  • Lung cancer, heart failure or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or other respiratory disease that may affect the evaluation of asthma
  • Patient unable to read French
  • Patient unwilling to take part in the research
  • Patient under guardianship / curators
  • Patient under AME

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
control level stable
severe asthma for which the control level is stable (variation in ACT score <3 between M0 and M6) contributing to the test-retest
biologic initiation
introduction or modification of biotherapy at M0
introduction or modification of biotherapy at M0

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Factorial validity of french traduction of SAQ (Severe Asthma Questionnaire )
Time Frame: 1 month
Factorial validity (evidence that the instrument measures a single concept): principal component analysis of all items
1 month
Internal consistency of french traduction of SAQ
Time Frame: 1 month
Internal consistency (intercorrelation of items that contribute to a score): Item total correlation and Cronbach's alpha coefficient
1 month
Construct validity of french traduction of SAQ
Time Frame: 1 month

Construct validity (strength of correlation testing a priori hypotheses (discriminant and convergent validity) and degree to which the PRO instrument can distinguish among groups hypothesized a priori to be different (known groups validity)): Spearman correlation between SAQ and ACT*, ACQ*, miniAQLQ*, SGRQ*, SF36*, EQ 5D 5L*, EQ 5D VAS*, OCS dose, Forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1))

  • ACT: Asthma Control Test i
  • ACQ: Asthma Control Questionnaire
  • MiniAQLQ: Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire
  • SGRQ: Saint Georges Respiratory Questionnaire
  • SF36: 36-item Short-Form Health Survey
  • EQ 5D 5L: 5Level-EuroQualityoflife Instrument 5 Dimension
  • EQ 5D VAS: EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability testing
Time Frame: 6 months
Questionnaire feasibility: Average filling percentage, mean filling time, need for help in responding, identification of problematic items, reason why they are problematic
6 months
Test-retest reliability
Time Frame: 6 months
Test-retest reliability (stability of scores over time when no change is expected in the concept of interest): intraclass correlation coefficient of SAQ M1 vs M6 within stable ACT score group adjusted on oral corticosteroids dose.
6 months
Ability to detect change
Time Frame: 6 months
Ability to detect change (evidence that a Patient Reported Outcome instrument can identify differences in scores over time in individuals or groups who have changed with respect to the measurement concept): Wilcoxon signed rank-test on oral corticosteroid dose, comparing individuals at M1 and M6 for whom an asthma biotherapy has been initiated in that time interval.
6 months
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)
Time Frame: 6 months
MCID (minimal difference of significance among any differences observed): anchored base estimation using a global 15point scale ranging scale to measure change.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Camille Taillé, MD-PHD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 6, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on biologic initiation

3
Subscribe