Evaluation of the Influence of Deep Brain Stimulation on the Spinal Deformities Associated With Parkinson's Disease

November 8, 2020 updated by: Philipp Spindler, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
The intention of the study is to investigate whether Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) will improve postural deformities of patients with Parkinson's disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Introduction

    Postural deformities are frequent comorbidities that limit the quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. Subject of the study is the investigation of postural deformities as a concomitant disease in connection with therapy with DBS. The aim of this prospective study is to examine the effect of deep brain stimulation on postural instability and thus the quality of life of patients.

  2. Study outline

    The aim of this prospective study is to investigate the effect of DBS on postural instability and thus the quality of life of patients.

    For this purpose, the investigators would like to evaluate 50 participants before and at certain time points (three, six, twelve and 24 months) after DBS surgery. X-rays of the entire spine are carried out using EOS® technology and biodynamic measurements of the spine using the Epionics SPINE ® system. In addition, the Investigators collect the 39-item PD Questionnaires (PDQ-39), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as clinical parameters.

    Our hypotheses (I): DBS improves the sagittal balance of the spine and the pelvic rotation as a corresponding compensation mechanism for this incorrect posture (II) The participant's mobility improves in course of DBS in terms of scope and speed (III) In course after DBS, back pain is significantly reduced and the participant's everyday life is easier to cope with.

    The investigators hope to gain new insights into the pathophysiology of the spinal deformities associated with Parkinson's disease from the study and to expand the indication for DBS to include clinically relevant spinal complaints.

  3. Consent to the study

    The study was positively assessed by the Charité ethics committee and the Federal Office for Radiation Protection.

    Consent for study inclusion is sought after explanation and agreement to DBS treatment for participants with Parkinson's disease. Thus, participants capable of consenting to the DBS treatment get the study details explained themselves and may or may not agree to participate. If a participant is incapable for consenting to the proposed treatment, he may not be enrolled in the study.

  4. Safety of DBS for Parkinson's disease and further risks for participants

    Deep brain stimulation is a well-established and well-tolerated treatment for Parkinson's disease.

    The study-related risks result from the multiple X-ray examinations of the spine (effective dose 2.6 µSv per examination). There are no other study-related risks of the planned ones.

  5. Insurance Coverage

An insurance was taken out for all study participants who took part in this study at HDI-Gerling Industrie Versichung AG, Riethorst 2, 30659 Hanover, Insurance number: 5701032603017.

German laws §§ 40 to 42 Arzneimittelgesetz or §§ 20 to 23 Medizinproduktegesetz are not applicable.

The Investigators are insured against fault-based damage through the existing liability insurance of their clinic.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Recruiting
        • Charité University Medicine Department of Neurosurgery Campus Charité Mitte
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women and men, over 18 years of age
  • medical indication for deep brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease
  • signed declaration of consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • withdrawal of consent
  • non-Parkinson's-associated diseases of the spine
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DBS for Parkinsons Disease

Deep brain stimulation involves implanting electrodes within certain areas of the brain. These electrodes produce electrical impulses that regulate abnormal impulses. Or the electrical impulses can affect certain cells and chemicals within the brain.

The amount of stimulation in deep brain stimulation is controlled by a pacemaker-like device placed under the skin in the upper chest. A wire that travels under the skin connects this device to the electrodes in the brain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sagittal Imbalance
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) in X-Ray of the Spine. SVA is identified as the location of the head with respect to the normal center of gravity by a plumb line dropped from the center of the C7 vertebral body to the posterior superior corner of the sacral end plate. It is measured in cm with pathological values >5cm and sagital Imbalance defined as SVA >10cm.
Two years after DBS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spine Mobility
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
Function of the back as well as the position and movement of the pelvis in patients with Parkinson's disease with a non-invasive measuring system, (Epionics SPINE System®). Scope (in degrees) and speed (in degrees/s) of motion are measured.
Two years after DBS
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting. It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability. The scores for all questions answered summed up and multiplied by two. To obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Two years after DBS
Visual Analoge Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Two years after DBS

VAS measure of subjective or behavioral experience of back pain. Range 0-10 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

visual analog scale

Two years after DBS
Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scala (Part III Motor Examination) (UPDRS-Part III)
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
The unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. Part III deals with motor experiences of daily living. It consists of 18 items. Each item has 0-4 ratings, where 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe
Two years after DBS
Parkinsons Disease Questionaire 39 (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
The PDQ-39 is a PD specific health status questionnaire comprising 39 items. Participants are requested to affirm one of five ordered response categories according to how often, due to their PD, they have experienced the problem defined by each item. Items are grouped into eight scales that are scored by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100 (100% more health problems).
Two years after DBS
Pelvic incidence (PI)
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
The pelvic incidence (PI) corresponds to the angle between the perpendicular to the upper S1 level passing through its center and the line connecting this point to the axis of the femoral heads. Normal 45 ° to 65 °
Two years after DBS
Pelvit tilt (PT)
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
The pelvic tilt (PT) is defined by the angle between the vertical and the line connecting the center of the sacral endplate to the axis of the femoral heads. Normal 3° to 18°
Two years after DBS
Sacral slope (SS)
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
The sacral slope (SS) is defined by the angle between a line tangent to the upper S1 endplate and horizontal line. Normal -32° to -49°
Two years after DBS
Lumbar Lordisis (LL)
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
Lumbar lordosis angle measures between the superior endplate of L1 and L5 inferior endplate. Norm 33.2 +/- 12.1 degrees
Two years after DBS
Mismatch of Pelvic incidence and LL (PI - LL)
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
Difference between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordisis. Norm <10 degrees
Two years after DBS
Scoliosis
Time Frame: Two years after DBS
Cobb Angle at a particular region of the vertebral column, when measured from the superior endplate of a superior vertebra to the inferior endplate of an inferior vertebra. No scoliosis <10°, mild scoliosis 10-30°, moderate scoliosis 30-45°, severe scoliosis >45°
Two years after DBS

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philipp Spindler, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Deep Brain Stimulation

Subscribe