The Research About Acute Compartment Syndrome

July 28, 2021 updated by: Hebei Medical University Third Hospital

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as a clinical entity originated from trauma or other conditions, and remains challenging to diagnose and treat effectively. Threre is the controversy in diagnosing, treating ACS. It was found that there was no criterion about the ACS, and result unnecessary osteotomy. The presence of clinical assessment (5P) always means the necrosis of muscles and was the most serious or irreversible stage of ACS. Besides pressure methods, the threshold of pressure identifying ACS was also controversial.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Ma Lijie, Doctor

Study Locations

    • Hebei
      • Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China, 050000
        • Recruiting
        • The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The severe tibial plateau (Ⅴand Ⅵ according to Schatzker's classification) in our hospital who will be treated with open internal fixation in our hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fracture patients with Schatzker V and VI,
  • Who were older than eighteen years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria were pathologic, extra-articular proximal tibial fracture,
  • Patients who was eighteen years or younger.
  • Patients treated with other implant,
  • underwent conservative management were also excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
fractures with blister appeared
tibial plateau fractures with blister observed
if it was suspected with ACS, the fasciotomy was conducted. but if the blister observed, it means decreased conmpartment sydrome. therefore, the blister observed can avoid unnecessary fasciotomy to patients suspected with ACS
fractures without blister appeared
tibial plateau fractures without blister observed
if it was suspected with ACS, the fasciotomy was conducted. but if the blister observed, it means decreased conmpartment sydrome. therefore, the blister observed can avoid unnecessary fasciotomy to patients suspected with ACS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
injury mechanism
Time Frame: up to 1 weeks
The relative data was collected about injury mechanism such as high falling accident, traffic accident, fall from standing height,Crushing
up to 1 weeks
the time when the blister appeared
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
The relative data was collected about the time when the blister appeared after injury
up to 4 weeks
time to reconstructive surgery
Time Frame: time to when the surgery was conducted after 2 weeks
The relative data was collected about time to reconstructive surgery
time to when the surgery was conducted after 2 weeks
union time
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The relative data was collected about union time
through study completion, an average of 1 year
No non-anatomic gap or step (larger than 5 mm)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The relative data was collected about complications
through study completion, an average of 1 year
secondary loss of reduction
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The relative data was collected about complications
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Deep venous thrombosis
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The relative data was collected about complications
through study completion, an average of 1 year
superficial wound problems
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The relative data was collected about complications
through study completion, an average of 1 year
blister skin immunochemistry and immunofluorescence analysis
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
CK1, 5, 10, claudin 1, 2 and occludin as determined by immunochemistry analysis, and skin barrier proteins; claudin 1, 2 and occludin was determined by immunofluorescence analysis and qPCR.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CK levels
Time Frame: through hospitalization completion, an average of 1 month
CK levels
through hospitalization completion, an average of 1 month
chloride levels
Time Frame: through hospitalization completion, an average of 1 month
chloride levels
through hospitalization completion, an average of 1 month
UREA levels
Time Frame: through hospitalization completion, an average of 1 month
UREA levels
through hospitalization completion, an average of 1 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LKS score
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Lysholm knee score
through study completion, an average of 1 year
VAS scores
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
visual analogue scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hou Zhiyong, Doctor, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 9, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

acute compartment syndrome

IPD Sharing Time Frame

2 years after the experiment was conducted

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

all authors focusing on ACS research

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Compartment Syndrome

Clinical Trials on fasciotomy

3
Subscribe