Predicting Acute Compartment Syndrome (PACS) (PACS)

Predicting Acute Compartment Syndrome (PACS) Using Optimized Clinical Assessment, Continuous Pressure Monitoring, and Continuous Tissue Oximetry

The long-term objective is to develop a tool to aid in making a timely and accurate diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome (ACS).

The immediate objective is to develop a model to accurately predict the likelihood of ACS based on data available to the clinician within the first 48 hours of injury (specific clinical findings supplemented by muscle oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and continuous intramuscular pressure (IMP) and perfusion pressure (PP) monitoring).

Our primary outcome is the retrospective assessment of the likelihood of compartment syndrome made by a panel of clinicians using the following data:

• A physiologic "fingerprint" composed of continuous pressure versus time curve, continuous oximetry values, response of muscle to fasciotomy when performed, and serum biomarkers of muscle injury (CPK levels).
• Clinical and functional outcomes at 6 months post-injury including: sensory exam, muscle function, presence/absence of myoneural deficit, and patient reported function using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Acute Compartment Syndrome
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Continuous tissue perfusion monitoring by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and intramuscular pressure (IMP)

Detailed Description

Specific Aim 1: Prospectively enroll and follow for 6 months a sample of 200 patients. Patients will receive continuous tissue perfusion monitoring using NIRS in all 4 leg compartments and intramuscular pressure (IMP) via indwelling catheters placed in the anterior and deep posterior compartments. These measures will be blinded and not provided in real time to treating physicians. All clinical care, including diagnosis of ACS, will be according to current standard-of-care practiced at each institution.

Specific Aim 2: Convene expert panels of 5 orthopaedic surgeons experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of ACS to retrospectively assess the likelihood that each patient had ACS. This retrospective assessment will be based on a 'patient profile' summarizing data collected as part of this study.

Specific Aim 3: Determine the extent to which clinicians agree in retrospective assessments of the likelihood of ACS.

Hypothesis: On the basis of known clinical and functional outcome at 6 months and monitoring information, clinicians will agree on the likelihood of ACS in < 90% of cases.

Specific Aim 4: Model the panel's assessment of the likelihood of ACS as a function of data available to the clinician within the first 48 hours of injury using a training set of the data. This model can then be used to compute a point estimate of the risk of ACS (and associated 95% confidence interval) for any given patient.

Specific Aim 5: Assess, for patients in a test/validation data set, the performance of the model in predicting the panel's assessment of the likelihood of ACS.

Hypothesis: In < 95% of the cases, the panel's assessment of the likelihood of ACS will fall within the 95% interval of uncertainty predicted by the model.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 194
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Colorado
    • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80203
      • Denver Health and Hospital Authority
  • Maryland
    • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 212101
      • University of Maryland/R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Medical Center
  • Minnesota
    • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55415
      • Hennepin County Medical Center / Regions Hospita
  • North Carolina
    • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
      • Carolinas Medical Center
    • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
      • Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
  • Tennessee
    • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
      • Vanderbilt Medical Center
  • Texas
    • Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States, 78234
      • San Antonio Military Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 60 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patient between the ages of 18 and 60
2. Weight of > 88 lb/40 kg

3. Patient presents with one of the following injuries:

   • Closed tibial shaft fracture with displacement, comminution, or segmental pattern
   • Closed bicondylar tibial plateau fracture or medial tibial plateau-knee dislocation
   • Open tibial shaft fracture (Gustilo Type I, II or IIIA)
   • Open bicondylar tibial plateau fracture or medial tibial plateau-knee dislocation (Gustilo Type I, II or IIIA)
   • Severe soft tissue crush injury to lower leg
   • Gun shot injury to leg
   • Proximal fibula fracture
4. Injury resulted from a high-energy mechanism (e.g. pedestrian struck; fall > 10 ft; MVA/MCA at speed > 30 mph; injury due to shotgun, rifle, or projectile)
5. The injury occurs no more than 12 hours prior to initiation of monitoring
6. If bilateral leg injuries are present, only the limb that is most severely injured in the judgment of the investigator will be studied
7. At least one extremity must be uninjured to serve as a control for muscle oximetry
8. Patients may have other injuries except as noted below under exclusion criteria
9. Patient may have impending compartment syndrome at time of evaluation; however, the surgeon must be able to initiate monitoring and take at least one set of muscle pressures and obtain one set of tissue oxygenation measurements prior to performing fasciotomy

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Soft tissue wounds that will interfere with monitoring (i.e. the insertion of indwelling pressure catheters and/or application of NIRS pads to the anterior and deep posterior compartments of the leg)
2. Patients with known peripheral vascular disease
3. Informed consent from the patient or from a legally authorized representative (LAR) is not obtained early enough to begin monitoring within 12 hours post-injury
4. Non-ambulatory due to an associated complete spinal cord injury
5. Non-ambulatory before the injury due to a pre-existing condition
6. Patient speaks neither English nor Spanish
7. Severe problems with maintaining follow-up (e.g. patients who are homeless at the time of injury or those how are intellectually challenged without adequate family support).
8. Prior extensive traumatic injury requiring surgery to either lower extremity.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Retrospective assessment of the likelihood of compartment syndrome	Retrospective assessment of the likelihood of compartment syndrome made by a panel of clinicians using the following data: A physiologic "fingerprint" composed of continuous pressure vs. time curve, continuous oximetry values, response of muscle to fasciotomy when performed, and serum biomarkers of muscle injury (CPK levels). Clinical and functional outcomes at 6 months post-injury including: sensory exam, muscle function, presence/absence of myoneural deficit, and patient reported function using the SMFA.	6 months post index injury

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Clinician agreement in retrospective assessments of the likelihood of ACS.	On the basis of known clinical and functional outcome at 6 months and monitoring information, clinicians will agree on the likelihood of ACS in <90% of cases.	6 months post index injury

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Andrew Schmidt, MD, Hennepin County Medical Center / UMN

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: October 1, 2012
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2015
• Study Completion (Actual): March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 20, 2012
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 22, 2012
• First Posted (Estimate): March 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 15, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 14, 2018
• Last Verified: November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: ACS; fasciotomy
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Disease; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Muscular Diseases; Syndrome; Compartment Syndromes
• Other Study ID Numbers: 00004105