- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04539327
Analysis of the Clinical Experience With Rucaparib in the Rucaparib Access Program (RAP) in Spain - A GEICO Study
The study consists of a retrospective observational, multicenter study in which the fundamental exposure factor being investigated is a drug (rucaparib).
A clinical database will be built including clinical data in three scenarios of rucaparib treatment: (1) platinum-sensitive BRCA-mutated patients after progression, (2) maintenance therapy in patients after a platinum-sensitive relapse in response, and (3) treatment therapy in BRCA-mutated patients who are currently platinum-resistant.
The specific objectives of the study are:
- To describe patient characteristics/medical history, safety, efficacy, and dosing of on-label treatment with rucaparib in real-world patients (real-world data).
- To describe patient characteristics/medical history, safety, efficacy, and dosing of all patients treated with rucaparib (including patients with on-label treatment and others) in real-world patients (real-world data).
- To show that data obtained in clinical trials could be reproduced in non-screened patients.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
An observational study (GEICO 87-R) was performed in high-grade ovarian cancer patients treated within the rucaparib access program (RAP) in Spain. The aim was to better understand rucaparib's management in real-life setting, to optimize future use, considering Pt-sensitive and Pt-resistant BRCAmut treatment and maintenance patients.
A retrospective study was performed at 22 GEICO hospitals in Spain that treated patients within RAP (600 mg BID) since September 2018. Adult women with high-grade epithelian ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, with medical record available, were included. Patient characteristics, medical history, safety, efficacy, and dosing data were collected.
The setting of this observational study was rucaparib's access program (RAP) in Spain, in the context of real-life use of the product.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Andalusia
-
Almería, Andalusia, Spain, 04009
- Hospital Torrecardenas
-
Málaga, Andalusia, Spain, 29010
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
-
Seville, Andalusia, Spain, 41013
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
-
Seville, Andalusia, Spain, 41014
- Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme
-
-
Aragon
-
Huesca, Aragon, Spain, 22004
- Hospital General San Jorge
-
Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain, 50009
- Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
-
Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain, 50009
- Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa
-
-
Balearic Islands
-
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain, 07120
- Hospital Universitario Son Espases
-
-
Catalonia
-
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08003
- Hospital del Mar
-
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08036
- Hospital Clinic i Provincial
-
-
Galicia
-
Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain, 36071
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra
-
-
Madrid
-
Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain, 28942
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28040
- Hospital Clinico San Carlos
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28050
- Centro Integral Oncologico Clara Campal
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28041
- Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28027
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28033
- Md Anderson Cancer Center
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28040
- Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz
-
San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain, 28702
- Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía
-
-
País Basco
-
Vitoria-Gasteiz, País Basco, Spain, 01009
- Hospital Universitario de Araba Txagorritxu
-
-
Valencia
-
Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 46026
- Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
-
Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 46009
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia
-
Xàtiva, Valencia, Spain, 46800
- Hospital Público Lluis Alcanyis
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Written informed consent must be signed by all patients participating in the study who can be interviewed in the hospital (accessible, alive patients). Informed consent may not be required from unaccessible patients (dead, lost, etc.) according to ethics committee permissions and applicable law for retrospective studies in Spain.
- Histological diagnosis of high-grade epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer treated in the context of rucaparib access program (RAP) in Spain.
- Adult women (18 years or more at the time of diagnosis).
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Patients without medical record available (lost, empty or unretrievable clinical information).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Relevant Co-morbidities
Time Frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
Patient characteristics and medical history Detected diseases include: arterial hypertension, diabetes melliutus, COPD, ischemic cardiomyopathy, cerebrovascular disease, obesity, etc. Measurements were done at baseline |
0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
|
Other Previous Cancers?
Time Frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
Patient characteristics and medical history.
Descriptive statistics: Other cancers present during trial including endometrial, breast , colorrectal, lung or other cancers Measurements were done at baseline
|
0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
|
Family History of Cancers?
Time Frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
Patient characteristics and medical history Family history of other cancers including ovarian, breast and others Measurements were done at baseline
|
0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
|
FIGO STAGE
Time Frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
Stage = tumor size and location; higher stage = more spread metastasis I Tumor confined to the corpus uteri IA No or less than half myometrial invasion IB Invasion equal to or more than half of the myometrium IC IA+IB + ascites IC1 surgical spill IC2 Capsule rupture before surgery or tumor on ovarian surface II Tumor invades cervical stroma, but does not extend beyond the uterus III Local and/or regional spread of the tumor IIIA Tumor invades the serosa of the corpus uteri and/or adnexae IIIA2 involvement of uterine subserosa or spread through uterine serosa IIIB Vaginal involvement and/or parametrial involvement IIIC Metastases to pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes IIIC1 Positive pelvic nodes IIIC2 Positive para-aortic nodes with or without positive pelvic lymph nodes IV Tumor invades bladder and/or bowel mucosa, and/or distant metastases IVA Tumor invasion of bladder and/or bowel mucosa IVB Distant metastasis (intra-abdominal metastases and/or inguinal nodes)
|
0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
|
Tumor Histology
Time Frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
Patient characteristics and medical history Tumor histology history Measurements were done at baseline
|
0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
|
BCRA Status
Time Frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
Patient characteristics and medical history mutational status (BRCA 1/2 [germline/somatic] and in other HRR genes) Measurements were done at baseline
|
0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
|
Deficiencies in Other Genes Involved in Homologous Recombination
Time Frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
Patient characteristics and medical history Other HRR deficiencies including RAD51C, RAD51D, PALBB2, BRIP1, CHEK1, CHEK2, BARD1, FAM175A, NEN, ATM, EMSY and others Measurements were done at baseline
|
0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
|
Surgeries Before Rucaparib
Time Frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
Patient characteristics and medical history Total number of surgeries per patient before treatment started Measurements were done at baseline
|
0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
|
Previous Lines
Time Frame: 0-24 months
|
Patient characteristics and medical history: Prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy |
0-24 months
|
|
PARPi Before Rucaparib
Time Frame: 0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
Patient characteristics and medical history: PARPi treatment before rucaparib Measurements were done at baseline |
0 months - Measurements were done at baseline
|
|
Average Dose of Rucaparib Received Per 12 Hours
Time Frame: 0-12 months
|
Rucaparib dosing data Descrption: average dose of rucaparib administered (mg/12h)
|
0-12 months
|
|
Rucaparib Drug Exposure
Time Frame: 0-24 months
|
Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Rucaparib drug exposure in months Patient 14-001 has been eliminated for not following the treatment scheme |
0-24 months
|
|
Dose Reductions
Time Frame: 0-12 months
|
Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Specific description: How many dose reductions had to be conducted on each patient *Patient 14-001 from treatment group has been eliminated by not following the tratment scheme |
0-12 months
|
|
Number of Dose Interruptions
Time Frame: 0-12 months
|
Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Specific description: How many dose interruptions had to be conducted on each patient *Patient 14-001 from treatment group has been eliminated by not following the tratment scheme |
0-12 months
|
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
Time Frame: 0-36 months
|
Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). For maintenance patients: Duration of response has been calculated taking into account the date of CR or RP prior to RAP until progression (on last follow date) during Rucaparib as a maintenance treatment. For treatment patients: Duration of response has been calculated taking into account the best response date (PR or CR) during Rucaparib until progression of follow-up date (Only patients with PR or CR as best overall response) |
0-36 months
|
|
End of Treatment
Time Frame: 0-24 months
|
Rucaparib dosing data: mean starting dose, number of dose reductions, reasons for reductions, number of treatment discontinuations, reasons for discontinuations, duration of treatment, and switching of maintenance therapy to another PARP inhibitor (including reasons for switching). Description: Rucaparib exposure termination (reasons) |
0-24 months
|
|
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 0-24 months
|
Rucaparib efficacy data ORR: Confirmed best overall tumor response of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 or Response and normalization or Response according to Rustin criteria. The RECIST v1.1 answer prevailed over the Rustin criterion answer except where RECIST is 'Not assessable' and Rustin criterion is different than 'Not assessable'. ORR was calculated only on the treatment population and not on the maintenance population. *This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival". |
0-24 months
|
|
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 0-24 months
|
Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). It represents the length of time during and after treatment that a patient lives with the disease, but without it getting worse. |
0-24 months
|
|
Radiological Best Overall Response
Time Frame: 0-24 months
|
Rucaparib efficacy data Radiological best overall response - Only 19 radiologically evaluable patients (treatment group only) *This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival". |
0-24 months
|
|
Biological Best Overall Response
Time Frame: 0-24 months
|
Rucaparib efficacy data: best response rates in the treatment indication patients, duration of response and PFS in the treatment indication patients, PFS in the maintenance indication patients, radiological response to chemotherapy in maintenance patients (and impact of response on patient evolution). Biological best overall response - Only 16 assessable patients (Treatment arm only) *This measurement was only taken in participants from the treatment group as these present an active disease, therefore Rucaparib was administered in order to reduce tumoral charge or control tumor progression. On the other hand, participants from the maintenance group have already responded to previous treatments, and rucaparib was administered I order to maintain response rate and/or delay progression, which was measured using "free-progression survival". |
0-24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alfonso Yubero, Dr., Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Genital Diseases, Female
- Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Ovarian Diseases
- Adnexal Diseases
- Genital Neoplasms, Female
- Gonadal Disorders
- Carcinoma
- Fallopian Tube Diseases
- Ovarian Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
- Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
- rucaparib
Other Study ID Numbers
- GEICO 87-R
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fallopian Tube Cancer
-
Gynecologic Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIA Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIA Ovarian Cancer | Stage IIB Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIB Ovarian Cancer | Stage IIC Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIC Ovarian Cancer | Stage IIIA Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIIA Ovarian Cancer | Stage IIIA Primary Peritoneal Cancer | Stage IIIB Fallopian... and other conditionsUnited States
-
OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedCancer Ovaries | Cancer Peritoneal | Cancer, Fallopian TubeUnited States
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri; Foundation MedicineRecruitingAdvanced (Stage IIIB-C-IV) Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal and Fallopian Tube CancerItaly
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnRecurrent Fallopian Tube Carcinoma | Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma | Recurrent Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma | Stage IIA Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIA Ovarian Cancer | Stage IIB Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIB Ovarian Cancer | Stage IIC Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIC Ovarian Cancer | Stage IIIA Fallopian... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Gynecologic Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingStage I Ovarian Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IA Fallopian Tube Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IB Fallopian Tube Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IC Fallopian Tube Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage II Ovarian Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IIA Fallopian Tube Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 | Stage IIB Fallopian... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterGenentech, Inc.CompletedOvarian Cancer | Peritoneal Cancer | Fallopian Tubes CancerUnited States
-
Centre Jean PerrinCompletedOvarian Cancer | Fallopian Tube Cancer | Peritoneal Cavity CancerFrance
-
Genentech, Inc.CompletedOvarian Cancer | Fallopian Tube Cancer | Peritoneal CancerUnited States
-
Precision TherapeuticsCompletedOvarian Cancer | Fallopian Tube Cancer | Peritoneal CancerUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi CompanyCompletedStage IV Ovarian Epithelial Cancer | Recurrent Ovarian Epithelial Cancer | Recurrent Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer | Stage IV Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer | Recurrent Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIA Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIB Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage IIC Fallopian Tube Cancer | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Rucaparib
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Clovis Oncology, Inc.Completed
-
pharmaand GmbHTerminated
-
UNICANCERClovis Oncology, Inc.; Fondation ARCCompletedMetastatic Breast CancerFrance
-
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineTerminatedPancreatic CancerUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Clovis Oncology, Inc.CompletedMetastatic Endometrial CancerUnited States
-
zr Pharma & GmbHCompletedNeoplasmsUnited Kingdom, Poland, Slovakia
-
zr Pharma & GmbHFoundation Medicine; Myriad Genetics, Inc.CompletedOvarian Cancer | Fallopian Tube Cancer | Epithelial Ovarian Cancer | Peritoneal CancerUnited States, Spain, Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, France
-
zr Pharma & GmbHCompleted
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterBristol-Myers Squibb; Clovis Oncology, Inc.Active, not recruiting
-
Zhonglin HaoClovis Oncology, Inc.CompletedSmall Cell Lung CancerUnited States