Feasibility of 5% Albumin Compared With Balanced Crystalloid, as Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation in Adult Patients With Sepsis, Presenting as an Emergency to Hospital (ABC Sepsis)

September 24, 2024 updated by: University of Edinburgh

Feasibility of 5% Albumin Compared With Balanced Crystalloid, as Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation in Adult Patients With Sepsis, Presenting as an Emergency to Hospital: ABC Sepsis Trial

The aim of this research study is to compare two different fluids (Human Albumin Solution (HAS) and Balanced Crystalloid that are given via a drip to patients with severe infection (sepsis). The investigators plan to see which fluid is better, and to see if they have a role in improving a patient's recovery time, reducing complications and the length of time they stay in hospital. This study plans to find out if there is evidence that one fluid is better overall to determine the need for a subsequent definitive trial.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This trial will be an open label two-arm, multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group randomised trial of adult patients with community acquired sepsis recruited from the Emergency Department and Medical and Surgical Assessment Units across ~10 UK NHS Hospitals. The treatment phase will be the first 6 hours following randomisation. 30-day and 90-day follow up will be conducted using routine data only. The exception to this will be the first 50 patients enrolled in the study, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) will be measured using the EQ-5D-5L at baseline, 7 days and at 180 days. At baseline, the participant or their relative will be asked to recall the quality of life 4 weeks prior to the index hospital admission. Questionnaires will be administered by direct patient completion or, postal or email survey with telephone follow up for non-responders after two mailings two weeks apart.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aberdeen, United Kingdom
        • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom
        • Addenbrookes Hospital
      • Derby, United Kingdom
        • Derby Teaching Hosptial NHS Foundation Trust
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom
        • Royal Infirmary Edinburgh
      • Exeter, United Kingdom
        • Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • Glasgow Royal Infirmary
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
      • Livingston, United Kingdom
        • St Johns
      • London, United Kingdom
        • University College London Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • St Georges Hospital
      • Oxford, United Kingdom
        • John Radcliffe Hospital
      • Paisley, United Kingdom
        • Royal Alexandra Hospital
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom
        • Derriford Hospital Plymouth
      • Salford, United Kingdom
        • Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
      • Taunton, United Kingdom
        • Musgrove Park Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adult patients (18 years or older) who present to UK NHS hospitals with community acquired sepsis meeting all of the 4 criteria:

  1. Clinically suspected or proven infection resulting in principal reason for acute illness;
  2. NEWS score ≥5 (or NEWS2 if adopted in recruitment site);
  3. Hospital presentation within last 12hrs; and
  4. Clinician decision has been made that immediate (within 1 hour) intravenous fluid resuscitation is needed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. >1 litre of intravenous crystalloid fluid or any intravenous HAS administered prior to eligibility assessment;
  2. Requirement for immediate surgery (within one hour of eligibility assessment);
  3. Chronic renal replacement therapy;
  4. Known allergy/adverse reaction to HAS;
  5. Balanced crystalloid or HAS not available;
  6. Known adverse reaction to blood products;
  7. Palliation/end of life care (explicit decision by patient/family/carers in conjunction with clinical team that any active treatment beyond symptomatic relief is not appropriate);
  8. Religious beliefs precluding HAS administration;
  9. Previous recruitment in the trial;
  10. Known recent severe traumatic brain injury (within 3 months);
  11. Patients with permanent incapacity;
  12. Known recruitment in another CTIMP studies within the last 30 days where co-enrolment has not been agreed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 5% Human Albumin Solution
Participants allocated to the treatment arm will receive intravenous 5% Human Albumin Solution (HAS) administered as the sole intravenous fluid during the initial 6-hour resuscitation period. The clinician can deliver up to 10ml/kg in the first 3 hours using 250ml boluses of HAS based on clinical judgement, using clinical assessment supplemented by technology if that is their usual practice. This will be followed by repeat clinical assessment after each bolus (including vital signs; lactate testing). After 3 hours further HAS boluses up to 6 hours post-randomisation will be at clinical discretion and will be documented in the CRF. Patients in the albumin arm should not receive balanced crystalloid as a resuscitation fluid in the first 6 hours.
Any preparation of 5% Human Albumin Solution which has marketing authorisation in the UK to be used for this indication and is stocked by local hospital pharmacies at the participating sites, may be prescribed in this study
Active Comparator: Intravenous balanced crystalloid
Participant allocated to the usual care arm will receive intravenous balanced crystalloid administered as the sole intravenous fluid during the initial 6 hour resuscitation period. The clinician can deliver up to 30ml/kg in the first 3 hours using 250ml boluses of balanced crystalloid based on clinical judgement, using clinical assessment supplemented by technology if that is their usual practice. This will be followed by repeat clinical assessment after each bolus (including vital signs; lactate testing). Thereafter, further crystalloid boluses up to 6 hours will be at the discretion of the clinical team and will be documented in the CRF. Patients in the balanced crystalloid arm should not receive albumin as a resuscitation fluid in the first 6 hours.
Any preparation of intravenous "balanced" crystalloid which has marketing authorisation in the UK to be used for this indication and is stocked by local hospital pharmacies at the participating sites, may be prescribed in this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: Approx 1 year
We measured the recruitment rate to assess deliverability. We aimed to recruit 300 participants in approximately 1 year in a 1:1 ratio into each treatment arm.
Approx 1 year
30-day Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
Assessment of how many participants in each arm died after 30 days to determine the effect size between the treatment groups.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Data Completeness of Primary Outcome
Time Frame: 180 days
Feasibility Outcome assessing the number of participants who provided data for clinical primary outcome (30 day mortality)
180 days
Withdrawal From Study
Time Frame: Approx 1 year
Feasibility Outcomes assessing the number of participants who withdraw from study intervention and/or data collection
Approx 1 year
Number of Patients Who Receive Any Other Fluid Apart From Intervention or Control in First 6 Hrs After Recruitment
Time Frame: 6 hours
Feasibility Outcome- number of patients who receive any other fluid apart from intervention or control in first 6 hrs after recruitment
6 hours
Time to Start of In-hospital Intravenous Fluids
Time Frame: From time of Randomisation until fluid first being administered measured up to 6 hours.
Feasibility Outcome- Time to start of in-hospital intravenous fluids
From time of Randomisation until fluid first being administered measured up to 6 hours.
In-hospital Mortality
Time Frame: From time of Randomisation until time of hospital discharge or death, whichever is first measured up to 90 days
Secondary Clinical Outcome
From time of Randomisation until time of hospital discharge or death, whichever is first measured up to 90 days
90-day Mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
Secondary Clinical Outcome
90 days
Volume of Randomised Fluid Delivered in Each Arm in the First 6hrs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Secondary Clinical Outcome- Volume of randomised fluid delivered in each arm in the first 6hrs
6 hours
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: 90 days
Secondary Clinical Outcome
90 days
Proportion of Patients Admitted to Critical Care (HDU/ICU)
Time Frame: 90 days
Secondary Clinical Outcome- Proportion of patients admitted to critical care (HDU/ICU)
90 days
Length of Stay in Critical Care (HDU/ICU)
Time Frame: 90 days
Secondary Clinical Outcome- Length of stay in critical care (HDU/ICU)
90 days
Number of Participants Needing Intravenous Vasopressors
Time Frame: From time of Randomisation until time of hospital discharge, measured up to 90 days.
Secondary Clinical Outcome-number of participants needing intravenous vasopressors
From time of Randomisation until time of hospital discharge, measured up to 90 days.
Number of Participants Needing Renal Replacement
Time Frame: From time of Randomisation until time of hospital discharge, measured up to 90 days.
Secondary Clinical Outcome- Number of participants needing renal replacement
From time of Randomisation until time of hospital discharge, measured up to 90 days.
Number of Participants Needing Invasive Ventilation
Time Frame: From time of Randomisation until time of hospital discharge, measured up to 90 days.
Secondary Clinical Outcome- Number of participants needing invasive ventilation
From time of Randomisation until time of hospital discharge, measured up to 90 days.
Number of Patients Readmitted in First 90 Days After Discharge
Time Frame: 90 days
Secondary Clinical Outcome- Number of patients readmitted in first 90 days after discharge
90 days
Number of Patients Developing Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)
Time Frame: 7 days

AKI Defined using National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria:

A diagnosis of AKI may be made if there is one of the following:

A rise in serum creatinine of 26 micromol/L or greater within 48 hours. A 50% or greater rise in serum creatinine known or presumed to have occurred within the past 7 days.

A fall in urine output to less than 0.5 mL/kg/hour for more than 6 hours.

7 days
Number of Patients Developing Pulmonary Oedema
Time Frame: 7 days
Safety Radiology diagnosis or requirement for rescue management (new diuretic use)
7 days
Number of Patients Developing Allergy or Anaphylaxis
Time Frame: 7 days
Requirement for rescue management (antihistamines, adrenaline, intravenous fluids, steroid)
7 days
Health Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire)
Time Frame: baseline
Health Economic Outcomes are measured using the the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. A high score indicates a worse outcome. The patient is asked to indicate their health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number (profile) that describes the patient's health state. The EQ-5D profile can be converted to a single number between 0-1 called the EQ-5D value. These EQ-5D values to lie on between 0-1 to indicate health where 0 represents the minimum score (dead) and 1 is full health. Values less than 0 are possible for health states considered worse than dead.
baseline
Secondary Care Costs
Time Frame: 30 days
Costs will be estimated by assigning national standard unit costs to inpatient stays (critical care and general ward level), readmissions and additional high costs activities observed in the study. Baseline (pre-admission) HQoL will be estimated using age/sex matched population reference data.
30 days
Volume of Randomised Fluid Delivered in Each Arm in the First 24hrs
Time Frame: 24 hours
Secondary Clinical Outcome-Volume of randomised fluid delivered in each arm in the first 24hrs
24 hours
Health Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire)
Time Frame: 7 Days
Health Economic Outcomes are measured using the the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. A high score indicates a worse outcome. The patient is asked to indicate their health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number (profile) that describes the patient's health state. The EQ-5D profile can be converted to a single number between 0-1 called the EQ-5D value. These EQ-5D values to lie on between 0-1 to indicate health where 0 represents the minimum score (dead) and 1 is full health. Values less than 0 are possible for health states considered worse than dead.
7 Days
Health Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire)
Time Frame: 180 Days
Health Economic Outcomes are measured using the the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. A high score indicates a worse outcome. The patient is asked to indicate their health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number (profile) that describes the patient's health state. The EQ-5D profile can be converted to a single number between 0-1 called the EQ-5D value. These EQ-5D values to lie on between 0-1 to indicate health where 0 represents the minimum score (dead) and 1 is full health. Values less than 0 are possible for health states considered worse than dead.
180 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alasdair Gray, University of Edinburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The intention is to share anonymised data with external collaborators and scientists one year after the primary publication has been published (anticipated Jun 2022).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From 2023

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests can be made by email to the Chief Investigator from 2023.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Human albumin

Subscribe