- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06525779
Comparison of Requirement of External Laryngeal Manipulation in Double Lumen Tube Insertion With McGrath Laryngoscope vs Macintosh Laryngoscope. A Randomized Control Trial
July 26, 2024 updated by: Farah Rasheed, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre
For anatomical and physiological isolation of the lung, a specialized endotracheal tube known as the double lumen tube (DLT) is used.
The introduction of DLT into anesthesia can be attributed to Carlen's who brought forth the concept in 1949.
Since then the structure of DLT has continuously evolved.
Simplistically speaking; the double lumen tube is a co-axial tube i.e. it contains two tubes put together, the tube with the shorter length stays in the trachea whereas the tube with the longer length enters the right or left main bronchus.
If the proximal or tracheal cuff is inflated, air entry is permitted into both lungs.
However, if the distal or the bronchial cuff is inflated, ventilation is directed into either lung depending on which lumen has been clamped, at the proximal end of the tube.
Conventionally the DLTs were made of red rubber and were reusable but now they have been replaced by disposable plastic tubes which make it easy to view any secretions or blood.
Also, since the plastic makes for a thin wall it allows the lumen of the tube to be large enough to allow airflow with minimal resistance.
Larger lumens also allow passage of suction catheters and fiber-optic bronchoscope which serves the purpose of confirming correct position of the double lumen tube after placement.
Tracheal intubation with a DLT may be facilitated by maneuvers such as external laryngeal manipulation (ELM).
It is a simple technique which has been used by anesthetists since many years to enable intubation.
Various types of video-laryngoscopes (VL) have been found to perform a crucial part in patients with difficult airways McGrath video-laryngoscope - a portable machine - provides a better laryngeal view compared to Macintosh laryngoscopy, involving cases of intubation involving patients with normal or difficult airways.
Though the use of VL for DLT placement has been reported, such studies have fallen short of producing the desired quality of evidence that is required to make a clear determination in favor of one method over the other.
It is suggested that more work is needed on this in order to create a wider, more reliable data pool.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
After approval from the hospital's institutional review board, a prospective clinical study was conducted at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH & RC), Lahore, from January 25, 2021 to July 25, 2021.
Data was collected from 60 patients that fulfilled the inclusion criteria.
Features considered, included patients' demographic including age, gender, co-morbidities and American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status.
In addition mallampati score, mouth opening and Wilson score of all patients was recorded as part of routine anesthesia airway assessment.
Patients being taken for study were randomly assigned to either of the two groups of 30 each, that is all patients at odd numbers (1, 3, 7, 9 etc.) was allocated to Group 1 (McGrath laryngoscope) whereas all patient at even numbers (2, 6, 8, 10 etc.) was allocated to Group 2 (Macintosh laryngoscope).
After explaining the procedure in detail and obtaining an informed consent in the presence of a witness, patients were transferred to the operating room.
After standard induction of anesthesia, tracheal intubation using either of the two laryngoscopes depending on group allocation (McGrath laryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope) was performed by a designated anesthesia consultant experienced in the use of double-lumen tubes.
The requirement of external laryngeal manipulation was recorded on a predesigned checklist.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
- Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA 1, 2, 3 patients
- 18-60 years of age
- Patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia requiring double lumen tube insertion (e.g. thoracic surgery, three stage esophagectomies)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient's refusal
- Patients with cervical spine instability/cervical myelopathy
- Patients requiring rapid sequence intubation
- Patients requiring additional intubation aids like bougie
- Patients having Wilson's Risk Score > 5 (refer to annexure)
- Patients with loose teeth
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Macintosh Laryngoscope Group
Patient undergoing intubation with direct laryngoscope using macintosh laryngoscope
|
The requirement of external laryngeal manipulation recorded in use of macintosh vs mcGrath laryngoscope in double lumen tube insertion
|
|
Active Comparator: McGrath Laryngoscope Group
Patient undergoing intubation with video laryngoscope using mcGrath laryngoscope
|
Use of mcGarth laryngoscope
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Requirement of External Laryngeal Manipulation
Time Frame: 6 MONTHS
|
Requirement of External Laryngeal Manipulation
|
6 MONTHS
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 25, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 25, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
July 25, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 26, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
July 29, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 29, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 26, 2024
Last Verified
July 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-19-15
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
no plan yet
IPD Sharing Time Frame
data is available to be shared
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
will be available once published
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intubation Complication
-
Emory UniversityTerminatedAirway Morbidity | Intubation Complication | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Tracheal Intubation Morbidity | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States
-
University Hospital HeidelbergRecruitingIntubation | Intubation ComplicationGermany
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...CompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation, DifficultTaiwan
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; DifficultChina
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalNot yet recruitingIntubation; Complication | Intubation Intraesophageal | Intubation Depth | Intubation, Nasogastric | Intubation Times
-
University at BuffaloTerminatedIntubation Complication | Intubation;DifficultUnited States
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfCompleted
-
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious DiseasesCompletedIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
Udayana UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Intubation Complication | Intubation;DifficultIndonesia
-
Hospital General Universitario de ValenciaFIPSERecruitingDifficult Intubation | Anesthesia Intubation ComplicationSpain
Clinical Trials on Use of macintosh laryngoscope
-
Manuel Ángel Gómez-RíosCompletedNasotracheal IntubationSpain
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc.CompletedIntubation, EndotrachealUnited States
-
Indonesia UniversityCompleted
-
General Hospital LinzCompleted
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreCompleted
-
Ankara UniversityCompletedAll the Pediatric Patients Needed Intubation for SurgeryTurkey
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedAdverse Effects of Endotracheal IntubationEgypt
-
Aga Khan UniversityCompleted
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Completed
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedPostoperative Vocal Cord Mobility | Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve InjuryTurkey (Türkiye)