Bone Toxicity Following Pelvic Radiotherapy (RadBone)

October 31, 2023 updated by: The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

Bone Toxicity Following Pelvic Radiotherapy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study Evaluating a Musculoskeletal Health Package in Women With Gynaecological Cancers Undergoing Pelvic Radiotherapy

A randomised controlled clinical feasibility trial to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a "musculoskeletal health package (MHP)" intervention in women undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological malignancies and inform power calculations for a definitive trial.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 4BX
        • Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age over 18 years
  • histologically confirmed uterine or cervix cancer
  • patients undergoing potentially curative/adjuvant radiotherapy
  • ability to give informed consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age less than 18 years or greater than 85 years
  • patients with pre-existing bone conditions such as: osteoporosis treated with bisphosphonates in the previous 5 years/fibrous dysplasia/osteogenesis imperfecta or other metabolic bone condition
  • inability to give informed consent to participate
  • home address outside Greater Manchester
  • contraindication or intolerance of Magnetic Resonance scanning

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care
No intervention. Standard of care cancer pathway followed.
Active Comparator: Musculoskeletal Health Package
3 month prehabilitation exercise program during radiotherapy and assessment of BMD at baseline with appropriate management according to fracture risk assessment (with either (a) lifestyle advice, (b) calcium and vitamin D (c) calcium, vitamin D and bisphosphonate (alendronate))
3 month prehabilitation exercise program during radiotherapy with assessment of BMD at baseline with appropriate management according to fracture risk assessment (with either (a) lifestyle advice, (b) calcium and vitamin D (c) calcium, vitamin D and bisphosphonate (alendronate))

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eligibility and screening rate
Time Frame: baseline
proportion of patients eligible for the study from the patient population
baseline
Recruitment and study group allocation rate
Time Frame: 2 weeks post consent
number of eligible patients recruited, randomised and allocated to appropriate study populations
2 weeks post consent
Recruitment and study group allocation rate
Time Frame: 2 weeks post consent
proportion of eligible patients recruited, randomised and allocated to appropriate study populations
2 weeks post consent
Intervention fidelity rate
Time Frame: end of study 18 months
number of patients completing the elements of the study
end of study 18 months
Intervention fidelity rate
Time Frame: end of study 18 months
proportion of patients completing the elements of the study
end of study 18 months
Attrition rate
Time Frame: end of study 18 months
number of patients lost to follow-up
end of study 18 months
Patient and physician acceptability y
Time Frame: change from baseline to 6 months
Patient and physician acceptability assessed with electronic questionnaires
change from baseline to 6 months
Patient and physician acceptability y
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
Patient and physician acceptability assessed with electronic questionnaires
change from baseline to 12 months
Patient and physician acceptability y
Time Frame: change from baseline to 18 months
Patient and physician acceptability assessed with electronic questionnaires
change from baseline to 18 months
Health Economic QOL Analysis
Time Frame: change from baseline to 6 months
EuroQol-5D-5L Quality of Life assessment
change from baseline to 6 months
Health Economic QOL Analysis
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
EuroQol-5D-5L Quality of Life assessment
change from baseline to 12 months
Health Economic QOL Analysis
Time Frame: change from baseline to 18 months
EuroQol-5D-5L Quality of Life assessment
change from baseline to 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Radiotherapy Related Insufficiency Fracture (RRIF)
Time Frame: assessed at 6, 12 , 18 months post radiotherapy
Incidence of RRIF assessed by MR
assessed at 6, 12 , 18 months post radiotherapy
Longitudinal change in BMD
Time Frame: assessed at baseline and 18 months
BMD measured by DXA at baseline and 18 months
assessed at baseline and 18 months
Longitudinal change in fracture risk using FRAX (inc BMD by DXA)
Time Frame: assessed at baseline and 18 months
FRAX assessment tool (including femoral neck BMD)
assessed at baseline and 18 months
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 2
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to week 2
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 3
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to week 3
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 4
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to week 4
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 5
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to week 5
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 6
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to week 6
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 7
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to week 7
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 8
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to week 8
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 9
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to week 9
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 6 months
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to 6 months
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to 12 months
Longitudinal change in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 18 months
serum Bone Turnover Markers
change from baseline to 18 months
Quality of Life Assessment : adapted CTCAE pelvic questionnaire
Time Frame: change from baseline to 6 months
CTCAE pelvic questionnaire, (common terminology criteria for adverse events). (measures: Bowel questions scored out of 22, urinary questions out of 19 and sexual questions out of 8. Total out of 49: higher score = worse quality of life)
change from baseline to 6 months
Quality of Life Assessment : adapted CTCAE pelvic questionnaire
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
CTCAE pelvic questionnaire, (common terminology criteria for adverse events). (measures: Bowel questions scored out of 22, urinary questions out of 19 and sexual questions out of 8. Total out of 49: higher score = worse quality of life)
change from baseline to 12 months
Quality of Life Assessment : adapted CTCAE pelvic questionnaire
Time Frame: change from baseline to 18 months
CTCAE pelvic questionnaire, (common terminology criteria for adverse events). (measures: Bowel questions scored out of 22, urinary questions out of 19 and sexual questions out of 8. Total out of 49: higher score = worse quality of life)
change from baseline to 18 months
Quality of Life Assessment: SMFA adapted to lower limbs
Time Frame: change from baseline to 6 months
adapted SMFA : short form musculoskeletal function assessment (scores are standardised with high scores indicating poor function. 39 questions min score possible 39, max score possible 195 (raw scores)
change from baseline to 6 months
Quality of Life Assessment: SMFA adapted to lower limbs
Time Frame: change from baseline to 12 months
adapted SMFA : short form musculoskeletal function assessment (scores are standardised with high scores indicating poor function. 39 questions min score possible 39, max score possible 195 (raw scores)
change from baseline to 12 months
Quality of Life Assessment: SMFA adapted to lower limbs
Time Frame: change from baseline to 18 months
adapted SMFA : short form musculoskeletal function assessment (scores are standardised with high scores indicating poor function. 39 questions min score possible 39, max score possible 195 (raw scores)
change from baseline to 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CFTSp180

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification will be available, according to below sponsor requirements: onsent to share data from this study for future research is voluntary. To ensure compliance with regulatory and governance requirements, approval from the sponsor team is required prior to the release of any data generated by this Christie sponsored study, to a third party. Any requests are to be directed towards the-christie.sponsoredresearch@nhs.net for consideration and must follow all local Policies and review procedures. If a proposal is accepted, then the sponsor will work with the requestor to develop any necessary data transfer plans/agreements.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available following analysis and initial publication of study findings. No end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Consent to share data from this study for future research is voluntary. To ensure compliance with regulatory and governance requirements, approval from the sponsor team is required prior to the release of any data generated by this Christie sponsored study, to a third party. Any requests are to be directed towards the-christie.sponsoredresearch@nhs.net for consideration and must follow all local Policies and review procedures. If a proposal is accepted, then the sponsor will work with the requestor to develop any necessary data transfer plans/agreements.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal health package

3
Subscribe