Prone Position to Improve Oxygenation in COVID-19 Patients Outside Critical Care (PRONE-COVID)

October 15, 2020 updated by: Dr Jonathan Fuld, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Prone Position to Improve Oxygenation in COVID-19 Patients Outside Critical Care (PRONE-COVID Study)

Prone positioning is known to improve the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and reduce mortality in patients with ARDS managed in the critical care setting. Therefore, it is incorporated into regular clinical practice of managing patients with ARDS in critical care and is being used as such in the COVID-19 outbreak. Given that prone positioning is recommended by the Intensive Care Society in non-ventilated patients with COVID-19, there is an urgent need to better understand the physiological effects of prone positioning in such cases. Furthermore, the translation and applicability of such a low-cost non-invasive intervention in a wider group of patients with pneumonia not specific to covid-19 infection, is an important consideration that merits investigation.

This single-centred observational study conducted at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust aims to improve understanding of physiological effects of prone positioning in non-ventilated patients with COVID-19 and a control group of patients with non-COVID-19 related pneumonia. The study also aims to incorporate a small subset of patients, with an approximately even spread of COVID-19 and non-COVID cases, which allows for an additional exploratory descriptive report on prone positioning over a 24-hour period.

This study proposes that prone positioning improves oxygenation in non-ventilated patients with pneumonia (COVID-19 related or not) requiring supplemental oxygen managed outside of the critical care setting.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) caused by the infectious agent, SARS-CoV-2, was first recognised in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in December 2019. Whilst a large proportion of COVID-19 illness within the community is mild, patients who are admitted to hospital with COVID-19 often have more severe disease and have a higher risk of developing COVID-19 complications including ARDS. Patients with ARDS are often managed on intensive care units that have evidence-based protocols for managing patients with ARDS. Prone positioning for such patients is a well-recognised component of ARDS critical care management. It is known to improve oxygenation and reduce oxygen requirements, as well as reduce mortality in patients with moderate to severe ARDS managed in critical care. The benefits of prone positioning as a technique to improve oxygenation in awake, non-intubated patients is less well-established. A few studies have showed prone positioning to be well-tolerated and improved oxygenation amongst non-intubated patients without respiratory support, as well as those requiring high-flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive ventilation support.

It remains unknown whether prone positioning is beneficial in patients with COVID-19 earlier in their disease, prior to requirement of non-invasive or invasive ventilation. This study therefore aims to better understand the physiological effects of prone positioning in patients with pneumonia with and without COVID-19.

This will be a single-centred interventional case-control study, comparing physiological effect of prone positioning in COVID-19 cases versus pneumonia unrelated to COVID-19. A sub-study of a smaller number of enrolled patients, with approximately even spread of COVID-19 and non-COVID cases, will allow an additional exploratory descriptive report on prone positioning over a 24-hour period.

Participant will be fitted with a Masimo monitoring device that enables continuous monitoring, and subsequent data storage and download of SpO2, heart rate, end tidal CO2 and respiratory rate. The sub-study investigating the effects of a longer duration of proning will involve applying a non-invasive positional sensor to automatically detect the participant's position, and correlate it with the patient's physiological parameters as well as tolerability. Qualitative data on patient's tolerability of prone positioning will also be collected.

It is anticipated that each participant will be their own control, enabling comparison of SpO2 in supine, lateral, prone and again supine positions. Summary statistics of mean, median, range, interquartile range, and range for each position for participants will be summarised. The data from the two arms will initially be analysed separately, then pooled to determine if a larger sample size impacts results. A multilevel regression model with average SpO2 as outcome will be fitted to assess the effect of lying position on SpO2. Additional models such as mixed models incorporating multiple repeated measurements/endpoints may be considered/fitted for exploratory analyses. Data from questionnaires will be reported by summary statistics where possible. Free text responses may be grouped into themes, and parametric or non-parametric tests will be used to analyse the VAS data further.

All data will be transferred into a Case Report Form (CRF) which will be anonymised. The investigator will obtain written informed consent from each participant before any study-specific activity is performed. Before the start of the study, or implementation of any amendment, we will obtain approval of the protocol, protocol amendments, informed consent forms and other relevant documents from the REC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cambridgeshire
      • Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB23 7PH
        • Recruiting
        • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Akhilesh Jha
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marie Fisk
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Iain Goodhart
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sam Mann
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fangyue Chen
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrew Ying
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Celine Goh
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chen Zhang
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kate Fitzpatrick

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Have confirmed or suspected COVID-19 or non-COVID pneumonia (confirmed with radiological changes)
  2. FiO2 ≥24% or requiring basic respiratory support (supplementary oxygen via face mask, nasal cannula, venturi, non-rebreathe bag) to achieve clinical target SpO2 (e.g. SpO2 92-96%), ensuring patient is on appropriately titrated oxygen to be within this range.
  3. Be able to provide informed consent
  4. Communicate and cooperate with the procedure
  5. Rotate and adjust position independently
  6. No anticipated airway issues

Exclusion Criteria:

The presence of any of the following will mean participants are ineligible:

  1. Signs of respiratory distress (e.g. respiratory rate ≥35, accessory muscle use)
  2. Immediate need for intubation
  3. Haemodynamic instability or new arrhythmia
  4. Unstable spine/thoracic injury/recent abdominal surgery
  5. Pregnancy (2nd/3rd trimester)
  6. At risk of pressure sores/ulcers
  7. Neurological issues-frequent seizures
  8. Facial injury that would make prone position difficult
  9. Gastrointestinal issues-frequent vomiting or diarrhoea that would make prone position difficult

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: COVID-19
Non-ventilated patients with COVID-19
Patient will first lay supine for a given time period, followed by lateral position on either side, then prone position, lastly return to supine position. Participants are anticipated to stay in prone position for a minimum of 30min to a maximum of 2 hours depending on tolerability. Participants will be guided in how to independently position themselves and rotate through the cycle of positions.
Other Names:
  • Proning
Active Comparator: Pneumonia control
Patients with pneumonia unrelated to COVID-19 requiring supplemental O2.
Patient will first lay supine for a given time period, followed by lateral position on either side, then prone position, lastly return to supine position. Participants are anticipated to stay in prone position for a minimum of 30min to a maximum of 2 hours depending on tolerability. Participants will be guided in how to independently position themselves and rotate through the cycle of positions.
Other Names:
  • Proning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peripheral Oxygen saturation
Time Frame: 1 year (June 2021)
Oxygenation measured by peripheral saturations in relation to inspired oxygen (FiO2) when patient is prone versus a supine or lateral position using a Masimo device
1 year (June 2021)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PaO2 :FiO2 ratio calculated from formulae
Time Frame: 1 year (June 2021)
To evaluate effects of prone position versus supine or lateral position on derived measures of oxygenation (Pa02:Fi02 ratio calculated from formulae) in relation to inspired oxygen.
1 year (June 2021)
Respiratory rate measured with Masimo device
Time Frame: 1 year (June 2021)
Effects of prone versus supine or lateral position on respiratory rate
1 year (June 2021)
Heart rate measured with Masimo device
Time Frame: 1 year (June 2021)
Effects of prone versus supine or lateral position on heart rate
1 year (June 2021)
Blood pressure measured with Masimo device
Time Frame: 1 year (June 2021)
Effects of prone versus supine or lateral position on blood pressure
1 year (June 2021)
Patient reported severity of breathlessness on a continuous linear scale of 0 to 10cm (10cm being the most severe)
Time Frame: 1 year (June 2021)
To evaluate whether prone position reduces patient reported severity of breathlessness assessed by visual assessment score.
1 year (June 2021)
Patient tolerability of prone position on a continuous linear scale of 0 to 10cm (10cm being the most unacceptable)
Time Frame: 1 year (June 2021)
To evaluate patient tolerability of prone position assessed by visual assessment score.
1 year (June 2021)
Investigator experience of delivering prone positioning
Time Frame: 1 year (June 2021)
To evaluate investigator experience of delivering prone positioning in this study by free text question responses.
1 year (June 2021)
To assess patient's peripheral oxygen saturation
Time Frame: 1 year (June 2021)
To evaluate the natural position of patients (with the aid of position sensors) who are encouraged to position themselves prone over a 24-hour period (which include sleep) and relationship with oxygenation
1 year (June 2021)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan Fuld, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Prone positioning

Subscribe