Treatment of Hallux Rigidus (HARD)

November 28, 2023 updated by: Mikko Miettinen, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa

Treatment of Hallux Rigidus (HARD): A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Trial of Arthrodesis Versus Watchful Waiting in the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus

A randomised, controlled trial will be performed by allocating 40 years or older patients with symptomatic hallux rigidus to arthrodesis or watchful waiting group in a ratio of 1:1. Our primary outcome will be pain during walking, assessed by the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at one year after randomisation. Our secondary outcomes will be pain in rest (NRS), physical function (MOXFQ), patient satisfaction in terms of Patient-accepted Symptom State (PASS), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), activity level (The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sports subscale), use of analgesics or orthoses and rate of complications. Our null hypothesis is that there will be no difference between arthrodesis and watchful waiting in treatment of hallux rigidus. Our primary analysis will be done using intention-to-treat principle.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Helsinki, Finland, 00029 HUS
        • Recruiting
        • Helsinki University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 40 years or over
  • Diagnosis of hallux rigidus: Persistent pain on movement of the first MTPJ AND Osteoarthritic first MTPJ in plain X-rays
  • Duration of symptoms ≥1 year
  • Pain-NRS during walking of 4 or more on a scale 0-10 (higher is worse)
  • No substantial pain in other joints of the foot in clinical examination
  • Willingness to accept both treatment options
  • Ability to understand trial information and answer outcome assessments in Finnish
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA* physical status classification level III or higher
  • Patients with weak co-operation (dementia, schizophrenia, etc.)
  • Patients with neuropathy, i.e. unable to feel 10g monofilament pressure in less than 8 out of 10 standard testing sites
  • Active bacterial infection or ulcer of the lower limb
  • Diabetes mellitus with insulin treatment
  • Diabetes mellitus and GHb-A1C >64 mmol/mol (regardless of treatment)
  • History of rheumatoid arthritis, gout or other inflammatory arthritis of the foot
  • Hallux valgus angle >15° in weight-bearing X-ray
  • Hallux varus in weight-bearing X-ray
  • Large bone cysts in X-ray probably requiring bone grafting in surgery
  • Pain in passive manipulation of ipsilateral first toe IP joint
  • Patients with severe circulatory disorder of the lower limb: absence of palpable pulses in the foot (both dorsalis pedis artery and tibialis posterior artery)
  • History of surgery of the foot in question
  • Neuropathic pain of the foot in question (i.e., use of neuropathic analgesics)
  • Activity limiting symptoms from an earlier fracture or ligament injury of the foot
  • Patient is not willing to accept the operation within the planned time limits (3 to 12 weeks post-randomisation)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arthrodesis
MTPJ I Arthrodesis
MTPJ I arthrodesis
No Intervention: Watchful waiting
No intervention, patient information leaflet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain during walking in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 1 year after randomisation
scale 0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain
1 year after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain during rest in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
scale 0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Pain during walking in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 6 months, 2 years, 5 years
scale 0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain
6 months, 2 years, 5 years
Patient Related Outcome
Time Frame: 6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
MOXFQ-score, Scale 0-100
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Patient reported quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
EQ-5D-5L, Scale 0-100
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Complications
Time Frame: 6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Number of minor and major adversary effects
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Patient Acceptable Symptom State
Time Frame: 6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Percentage of patients with acceptable symptom state (PASS)
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Patients physical activity
Time Frame: 6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
FAAM Sports Subscale, Scale 0-100
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Use of analgesics and orthoses
Time Frame: 6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years

The use of analgesics: 1) no use of analgesics or less frequent than weekly, 2) weekly use of analgesics, 3) daily use of NSAIDS or paracetamol, 4) daily use of opioids.

The use of orthoses: yes/no

6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jussi Repo, M.D., Ph.D., Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hallux Rigidus

Clinical Trials on Arthrodesis

3
Subscribe