Randomized Comparison of PARtial Wrist Fusion With or Without Triquetral Excision (PARTE) (PARTE)

March 12, 2024 updated by: University of Alberta
This randomized clinical trial (RCT) aims to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of different partial wrist fusion techniques in participants with post-traumatic wrist arthritis. Participants with stage II or III scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: Group A (partial wrist arthrodesis without triquetral excision i.e. four-corner arthrodesis), or Group B (partial wrist arthrodesis with triquetral excision i.e. three-corner or capitolunate arthrodesis with triquetral excision). The results of this study will provide evidence to guide surgeons in determining the ideal wrist fusion technique in the management of patients with post-traumatic wrist arthritis requiring surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study has been designed as a multi-center double-blind prospective randomized clinical trial. Eligible participants will be adults presenting with SNAC or SLAC wrist arthritis who have been deemed an operative candidate and qualify for one of the following salvage techniques: four-corner arthrodesis (without triquetral excision) or three-corner/capitolunate arthrodeses with triquetral excision.

Once eligibility is confirmed, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms. Participants in Group A will undergo four-corner arthrodesis; the scaphoid will be excised and the lunate, capitate, triquetrum, and hamate will be prepared and fused. Participants in Group B will undergo partial wrist arthrodesis with triquetral excision; the scaphoid and triquetrum will be excised. In the three-corner arthrodesis procedure, the articular surfaces between the lunate, capitate, and hamate will be prepared and fused. In the capitolunate arthrodesis procedure, only the articular surface between the lunate and capitate will be prepared and fused.

Eligible and consented participants will undergo a pre-operative study assessment and follow-up assessments at 6-weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-operative. Assessments will be conducted by an assessor blinded to participant treatment allocation. At each assessment, grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaire, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain will be completed. The work and sports/performing arts modules of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), and the WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper extremity disorders (WORQ-UP), will be completed at baseline (pre-surgery) and at 12-months. Standard posteroanterior and lateral radiographs will be completed at all visits. Complications will be documented at each visit.

The primary outcome, grip strength, will be measured with a handheld dynamometer. Absolute values and percentage of their contralateral side will be compared between the two groups.

Statistical analysis will use the intention-to-treat approach with all outcomes attributed to the assigned group. Descriptive statistics will be used for group comparisons with independent t-tests for continuous and Pearson Chi-square or Fisher's Exact tests for categorical variables at baseline and for possible complications/adverse events. Linear Mixed Modeling (LMM), adjusted for age and sex, will compare outcomes between groups over the 12-month evaluation period. The level of significance will be set at α=0.05.

This study hypothesizes that partial wrist fusion with triquetral excision will lead to improved grip strength and ROM compared to four-corner arthrodesis. Considering the importance of ROM and grip strength in many activities of daily living and manual work, it is hypothesized that the group with triquetral excision (Group B) will have better patient-reported outcomes. We hypothesize no significant difference between the groups with regards to radiographic outcomes and complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Dr. Armin Badre, MD, MSc, FRCSC
  • Phone Number: (780) 569-5494
  • Email: badre@ualberta.ca

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Collaborative Orthopaedic Research (CORe)
  • Phone Number: (780) 492-0830

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Peter Lougheed Centre
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kevin Hildebrand, MD, FRCSC, CCPE
        • Contact:
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • South Health Campus
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Neil White, MD, FRCSC
      • St. Albert, Alberta, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Western Hand & Upper Limb Facility, Sturgeon Community Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Collaborative Orthopaedic Research
          • Phone Number: (780) 492-0830
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Manisha Mistry, MD, MSc, FRCSC
    • Saskatchewan
      • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • University of Saskatchewan
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laura A. Sims, MD, FRCSC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a stage II or III scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist and is a surgical candidate for the included surgical interventions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has been diagnosed with other forms of wrist arthritis other than SLAC or SNAC
  • Participant has significant arthritis of the ipsilateral hand/finger joint(s), major joint trauma, previous major wrist surgery, infection or neuromuscular pathology affecting the function of the ipsilateral upper extremity or ability to make a fist
  • Participant has a physical or mental health condition preventing completion of consent or questionnaires
  • Participant does not speak/read/understand English
  • Participant has no fixed address or means of contact
  • Participant is unwilling to complete necessary follow-ups
  • Surgeon concludes that eligible salvage techniques are not appropriate at the time of surgery (based on injury characteristics or concomitant wrist pathology)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A: Partial Wrist Arthrodesis without Triquetral Excision
Four-Corner Arthrodesis
Participants in Group A will receive a four-corner arthrodesis (fusion of the capitate, hamate, lunate, and triquetrum) with excision of the scaphoid.
Active Comparator: Group B: Partial Wrist Arthrodesis with Triquetral Excision
Three-Corner or Capitolunate Arthrodesis with Triquetral Excision
Participants in Group B will receive a three-corner arthrodesis (fusion of the capitate, hamate, and lunate) or capitolunate arthrodesis (fusion of the capitate and lunate) with excision of the scaphoid and triquetrum.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grip Strength
Time Frame: Completed at baseline (pre-surgery), 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Peak grip strength will be assessed using a hand-held dynamometer. Grip strength will be compared between groups over the 12-month evaluation period.
Completed at baseline (pre-surgery), 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wrist Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Active and passive wrist ROM will be assessed using a goniometer. ROM will be compared between groups over the 12-month evaluation period.
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
PROMIS questionnaire will be used to assess self-reported physical function, upper extremity, pain interference, emotional distress. PROMIS scores will be compared between groups over the 12-month evaluation period.
Baseline, 6-weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Pain and function from 0-10 will be self-reported using the PRWE. PRWE scores will be compared between groups over the 12-month evaluation period.
Baseline, 6-weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Pain will be self-reported using VAS where zero equals no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. VAS pain scores will be compared between groups over the 12-month evaluation period.
Baseline, 6-weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Complications
Time Frame: 6-weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Complications including infection and nonunion will be compared between groups over the 12-month evaluation period.
6-weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-months post-surgery
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire - work and sports/performing arts modules
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months post-surgery
The work and sports/performing arts modules of the QuickDASH will be collected to measure the extent that participants experience limitations in their work and recreational activities, as applicable. Scores will be compared between groups.
Baseline, 12-months post-surgery
WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper extremity disorders (WORQ-UP) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months post-surgery
The WORQ-UP will be collected to measure the extent that participants experience limitations in their work, as applicable. Scores will be compared between groups.
Baseline, 12-months post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Four-Corner Arthrodesis

3
Subscribe