FANTOM ENCORE Sirolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold for Treatment of De-novo CAD: the ENCORE-I Study

October 12, 2020 updated by: Joost Daemen

Safety and Efficacy of the FANTOM ENCORE Sirolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold for Treatment of De-novo Coronary Artery Disease: the ENCORE-I Study

Prospective, multicentre, non-randomized, investigator-initiated study aiming to assess the safety and efficacy of the Fantom Encore sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Up to 50 consecutive participants with de-novo non-complex obstructive coronary lesions and non-ST elevation acute coronay syndromes or stable angina pectoris will be included in the Netherlands and Belgium.

Device performance and behaviour will be assessed by angiography and optical coherence tomography at the index procedure and at 13 months follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Genk, Belgium
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
        • Contact:
          • Jo Dens, Prof. Dr.
      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
        • Contact:
          • Tom Adriaenssens, Prof. Dr.
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Erasmus Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Stable angina, unstable angina or documented silent ischemia (invasive or non-invasive test) or non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.
  • De-novo non-complex coronary obstructive lesions (>50% stenosis as assessed by quantitative coronary analysis (QCA))
  • The patient is willing and able to comply with the specified follow-up evaluations.
  • Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.0 mm by QCA.
  • During pre-dilatation, the pre-dilatation balloon is uniformly expanded to the full intended diameter.
  • Target segment suitable for OCT imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Target vessel with a distal Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0 or 1.
  • Target lesion located within 5.0 mm of vessel origin.
  • Lesion type ACC/AHA C.
  • Heavily calcified lesion
  • Severe tortuosity
  • Target lesion is located in or supplied by an arterial or venous bypass graft.
  • Target lesion requires treatment with a device other than the pre-dilatation balloon prior to scaffold placement (including but not limited to directional coronary atherectomy, excimer laser, rotational atherectomy, etc.).
  • Unsuccessful pre-dilatation, defined as a residual diameter stenosis ≥ 30%, assessed by QCA.
  • Planned future revascularization of non-culprit lesions.
  • Presence of another device (stent or scaffold) located within the same segment (5mm from the target lesion borders).
  • Patient is currently participating in another study with an investigational device or an investigational drug and has not completed the entire follow-up period.
  • Impaired renal function (eGFR <30ml/min).
  • Patient has a contraindication for the use of double antiplatelet therapy for at least 12 months.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
  • Patient has a known allergy to contrast medium, sirolimus, Tyrosine-derived polycarbonate or other structurally related compounds.
  • Patient is receiving chronic oral or intravenous immunosuppressive therapy or has known life-limiting immunosuppressive or autoimmune disease (diabetes mellitus is not an exclusion criteria).
  • Patient has a co-morbidity, which reduces life expectancy to ≤ 24 months, or social-economic factors making compliance with the study requirements difficult.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Single arm
Fantom Encore Bioresorbable scaffold implantation
Fantom Encore Bioresorbable scaffold implantation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device-Oriented Composite Endpoint (DOCE)
Time Frame: 12 months
A composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization(CD-TLR).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subcomponents of DOCE
Time Frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Subcomponents of the Device-Oriented Composite Endpoints
30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Time Frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Target vessel revascularization
30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST)
Time Frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Stent thrombosis
30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Angiographic outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: 0 days
Acute gain
0 days
Angiographic outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: 0 days
acute recoil
0 days
Angiographic outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: 0 days
Incidence of procedural complications (dissection >B, perforation, vessel closure, slow flow or no-reflow, intra-procedure scaffold thrombosis)
0 days
Angiographic outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
In-device and in-segment late lumen loss (LLL)
13 months
Angiographic outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
In-device and in-segment binary restenosis rate
13 months
Device performance
Time Frame: 0 days
Device success
0 days
Device performance
Time Frame: 0 days
Procedural success
0 days
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: 0 days
Incomplete strut apposition (ISA)
0 days
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: 0 days
Scaffold expansion
0 days
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: 0 days
Scaffold eccentricity
0 days
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: 0 days
Scaffold symmetry index
0 days
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: 0 days
Edge dissection
0 days
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: 0 days
In-device and in-segment endothelial shear stress
0 days
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
Neointima thickness
13 months
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
Percentage of patent struts
13 months
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
Percentage of uncovered struts
13 months
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
Persistent ISA
13 months
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
Acquired ISA
13 months
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
Scaffold eccentricity index
13 months
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
Scaffold symmetry index
13 months
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
In-device and in-segment late lumen area loss
13 months
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
In-device and in-segment binary restenosis rate.
13 months
Optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up
Time Frame: 13 months
In-device and in-segment endothelial shear stress
13 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joost Daemen, MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ENCORE-I

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Clinical Trials on Fantom Encore Bioresorbable scaffold implantation

Subscribe